You will not regret.hollowhero wrote:In other news I'm gassing uncontrollably for a g&l asat special
I picked up the Tribute version a couple months ago and I'm in love.
Moderator: Ghost Hip

You will not regret.hollowhero wrote:In other news I'm gassing uncontrollably for a g&l asat special

Achtane wrote:FUZZ ALL DAY MAN FUZZ IS GOD ALL OTHER EFFECTS ARE SHIT
Caesar wrote:Dude, can you get the fuck out of my b/s/t thread with your bullshit.
PumpkinPieces wrote: This isn't America, this is I Love Fuzz.
Mudfuzz wrote:Remember when we were all just a bunch of weirdos that liked fucked up shit and not just a bunch of nerds buying bling to impress each other online?

hehehehollowhero wrote:I did the exact opposite on my bday...no regrets so farMuse FTW wrote:My birthday is coming up soon.
I'm trying to resist the allure of splurging.

hbombgraphics wrote:paypal gift awakens a beast from underneath the earth that eats puppies

Can it be used on the sort of stages where you have a sound guy going "yeah, look guys, can we get a little less volume from the guitars on stage - I'll pump it up in the mix ok?". Or is it just stupid loud all the time?univalve wrote:It died in The Studio last Summer. Stopped working without any signs... I had a 3 Year warranty and got The money back After one Year playing that amp. Bugera was unable to repair it though.
The 1960 sounds like a 1959 with less bass and better Volume adjustment. I liked it.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.

D...do it. C'mon. Do it.Fuzzy Picklez wrote:Is a 6x12 worth lugging around?
Can't be much worse then an 8x10 right?

…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?

Fuzzy Picklez wrote:Is a 6x12 worth lugging around?
Can't be much worse then an 8x10 right?



The 1959 is kind of on/off: not much happening and when you have the volume knob a bit above 2 it has its full volume. Turning the volume knob up more just gives added overdrive - not more volume. The 1960 is way more useable in that aspect.goroth wrote:Can it be used on the sort of stages where you have a sound guy going "yeah, look guys, can we get a little less volume from the guitars on stage - I'll pump it up in the mix ok?". Or is it just stupid loud all the time?univalve wrote:It died in The Studio last Summer. Stopped working without any signs... I had a 3 Year warranty and got The money back After one Year playing that amp. Bugera was unable to repair it though.
The 1960 sounds like a 1959 with less bass and better Volume adjustment. I liked it.


I wouldnt want to be standing that close to it playing either, 600W of valve powertuffteef wrote:lol
i think i need more mids... let me get the ladder out

univalve wrote:Boner on Fire Wallet Panties!


Ok, cool. It's been on my radar for a while but I'm concerned about not being able to turn it down to a useable volume for a smaller stage. Might pick one up anyway at some stage. Thanks for the help dude.univalve wrote:The 1959 is kind of on/off: not much happening and when you have the volume knob a bit above 2 it has its full volume. Turning the volume knob up more just gives added overdrive - not more volume. The 1960 is way more useable in that aspect.goroth wrote:Can it be used on the sort of stages where you have a sound guy going "yeah, look guys, can we get a little less volume from the guitars on stage - I'll pump it up in the mix ok?". Or is it just stupid loud all the time?univalve wrote:It died in The Studio last Summer. Stopped working without any signs... I had a 3 Year warranty and got The money back After one Year playing that amp. Bugera was unable to repair it though.
The 1960 sounds like a 1959 with less bass and better Volume adjustment. I liked it.
When my 1960 stopped working, i used the (vintage) 1959 of the studio for the recording. So i did a pretty good a/b-ing with these. The bass response of the 1959 was that intense, that it forced the plug out of the cab. So i stacked the empty drum bags behind my cab to avoid this...
I asume, the building parts and trannies of the 1959 are a bit better (in regards to the quality), hence the better bass response.
I paid 299 EUR for the 1960. Played it one year and got the money back. I'm a bit scared that Bugera, which is a german company that produces in China, was not able to repair it... I still play my Bugera bass amp and love it. But i'm not on the fence to get another one.
Right now i use my divided as my recording amp in my basement. I really love that amp - favorit amp ever. So it would be the best to afford another one for the practice space instead buying something else (I was thinking about Budda, Vox, an old Sunn, Marshall 1959 etc. but if i spend that much, another divided is not that far away...)
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.

I've wanted a G&L since I played a Tribute model in Mansons, UK. The pickups were the coolest combination of P90 and Tele. The build was excellent as well considering how affordable they are, so it stands to reason the USA model would be even better. I really want the SC-2.hollowhero wrote:A box of awesome from Arc effects should be on its way sometime soon![]()
In other news I'm gassing uncontrollably for a g&l asat special



What Divided by 13 amp do you have?univalve wrote:The 1959 is kind of on/off: not much happening and when you have the volume knob a bit above 2 it has its full volume. Turning the volume knob up more just gives added overdrive - not more volume. The 1960 is way more useable in that aspect.goroth wrote:Can it be used on the sort of stages where you have a sound guy going "yeah, look guys, can we get a little less volume from the guitars on stage - I'll pump it up in the mix ok?". Or is it just stupid loud all the time?univalve wrote:It died in The Studio last Summer. Stopped working without any signs... I had a 3 Year warranty and got The money back After one Year playing that amp. Bugera was unable to repair it though.
The 1960 sounds like a 1959 with less bass and better Volume adjustment. I liked it.
When my 1960 stopped working, i used the (vintage) 1959 of the studio for the recording. So i did a pretty good a/b-ing with these. The bass response of the 1959 was that intense, that it forced the plug out of the cab. So i stacked the empty drum bags behind my cab to avoid this...
I asume, the building parts and trannies of the 1959 are a bit better (in regards to the quality), hence the better bass response.
I paid 299 EUR for the 1960. Played it one year and got the money back. I'm a bit scared that Bugera, which is a german company that produces in China, was not able to repair it... I still play my Bugera bass amp and love it. But i'm not on the fence to get another one.
Right now i use my divided as my recording amp in my basement. I really love that amp - favorit amp ever. So it would be the best to afford another one for the practice space instead buying something else (I was thinking about Budda, Vox, an old Sunn, Marshall 1959 etc. but if i spend that much, another divided is not that far away...)