Esoterics // Superstition

General discussion at the Wang Bar.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
phantasmagorovich
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by phantasmagorovich »

bigchiefbc wrote:
phantasmagorovich wrote:
devnulljp wrote:
phantasmagorovich wrote:But what does this mean to me?
It means that we're right about physics -- that affects you, whether you know it or not (you're on the Internet right?). You live in a technological sociey, and the things you do every day -- Internet, cell phone, driving, watch TV, use a tube amp ... --
phantasmagorovich wrote:See, there's something wrong there. I know some of what advanced science does can be explained in a way that is understandable. Why isn't that widely done?
It is. Scour through the pop sci section of your local bookstore (it's usually only a shelf or two, in place of the racks and racks of The Secret) or on Amazon. It can take a bit of work to really understand it though. That's why homeopathy and reiki and astrology and religion and all that other crap is so popular -- it's so easy.


Pt. 1: Is the discovery of this boson the reason for my tube amp to stop working? Well, then damn, undiscover that piece of hickup right away please. I'm not talking about elementary physics like what we learned in school, it's obvious that stuff can be applied in a way that matters to me. (Cellphone, internet, tube technology, microchips etc) But what does the discovery of a boson matter to me?


All of those technologies are based on physics that we just discovered in the last century. It wasn't elementary at the time, it was a new, relatively obscure discovery at the time. So who knows what awesome technology may come out of this discovery? The Higgs boson is what controls mass, and thus inertia/momentum. Maybe we'll eventually learn how to manipulate those things. I want my fucking inertial dampeners like in star trek.



Sounds like a badass technology for ever-sustaining strings is at hand!
User avatar
alexa.
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2320
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
Location: Bosnian Pyramids

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by alexa. »

mmmm, necron tomb ships <3
Image
L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
User avatar
snipelfritz
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11703
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:28 pm
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by snipelfritz »

alexa. wrote:A quick test for everyone feeling curious enough about reality.
Notice: the movie is one big expression, interlinked, so if you plan on watching a part and saying: "I DON'T LIKE THAT THIS IS BULLSHIT"; don't watch it partially, watch it from start to end (part by part if you feel it's too much for you at once), listen to everything, don't judge, rather try to observe the world through that point of view. It will give you a better idea of what it is said, giving you understanding, then making you able to exclaim if you feel there is truth and logic in the statement, or you have reason not to believe it is a valid opinion. This could be a fun challenge to everyone priding themselves in their logic and scientific approach (etc.).
Enjoy the journey.
<3

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrAgb1-UKQ8[/youtube]

I'm intrigued, I just don't have an hour and a half at the moment. And drugs, just from the first two minutes I think it might lend itself to some...ahem..."artificial enhancement". ;)

But that seems pretty cool. Watching Chris Marker's Sans Soleil for a class last spring really turned me on to the idea of the essay film.
BOOM-SHAKALAKALAKA-BOOM-SHAKALAKUNGA
Behndy wrote:i don't like people with "talent" and "skills" that don't feel the need to cover their inadequacies under good time happy sounds.
User avatar
alexa.
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2320
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
Location: Bosnian Pyramids

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by alexa. »

snipelfritz wrote:I'm intrigued, I just don't have an hour and a half at the moment. And drugs, just from the first two minutes I think it might lend itself to some...ahem..."artificial enhancement". ;)

But that seems pretty cool. Watching Chris Marker's Sans Soleil for a class last spring really turned me on to the idea of the essay film.


Honestly, you don't want any 'enchantments' cuz it's pretty hard to take in at once, and most people don't have a good attention span while high. :lol:
Image
L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
User avatar
devnulljp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3989
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by devnulljp »

phantasmagorovich wrote:Pt. 2: Yup, you are right in a way. What I am asking is basically: Why can't popular science be as easy to understand as esoterics
Because esoterics is just shit somebody made up. A lot of it is just cold reading anyway, so people read into it what they want and it doesn't matter if they don't get it because it is just shit somebody made up.
Real stuff is a bit harder because you don't get to just assert things and have them accepted, there is usually a shitload of a backstory you have to have in order for it to make sense.
Good deals done with all these guys
Canada, we put the "u" in satire
User avatar
Derelict78
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Cadillac, MI

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by Derelict78 »

devnulljp wrote:
phantasmagorovich wrote:Pt. 2: Yup, you are right in a way. What I am asking is basically: Why can't popular science be as easy to understand as esoterics
Because esoterics is just shit somebody made up. A lot of it is just cold reading anyway, so people read into it what they want and it doesn't matter if they don't get it because it is just shit somebody made up.
Real stuff is a bit harder because you don't get to just assert things and have them accepted, there is usually a shitload of a backstory you have to have in order for it to make sense.

I completely disagree
esoterics is not something thats just "made up" Some yeah but a lot has been tested over and over.
"A lot of it is just cold reading anyway" it is a very small amount of reading and a LOT of work
Image
aen wrote:Or I'll just use fuzz. Then Ill sound cool regardless.
Achtane wrote:Well, volcanoes are pretty fuckin' cool. Like I guess lava flows are doomy. Slow and still able to to melt your eardrums.
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by bigchiefbc »

Derelict78 wrote:
devnulljp wrote:
phantasmagorovich wrote:Pt. 2: Yup, you are right in a way. What I am asking is basically: Why can't popular science be as easy to understand as esoterics
Because esoterics is just shit somebody made up. A lot of it is just cold reading anyway, so people read into it what they want and it doesn't matter if they don't get it because it is just shit somebody made up.
Real stuff is a bit harder because you don't get to just assert things and have them accepted, there is usually a shitload of a backstory you have to have in order for it to make sense.

I completely disagree
esoterics is not something thats just "made up" Some yeah but a lot has been tested over and over.
"A lot of it is just cold reading anyway" it is a very small amount of reading and a LOT of work


Wait, what has been tested over and over and shown to be real? I'm really curious. Because if there is anything supernatural, paranormal or occult that can be replicated in a real test, the Randi foundation has been offering a million dollars to anyone who can prove it.

http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
devnulljp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3989
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by devnulljp »

Derelict78 wrote:esoterics is not something thats just "made up" Some yeah but a lot has been tested over and over.
Such as .... ?
Derelict78 wrote:"A lot of it is just cold reading anyway" it is a very small amount of reading and a LOT of work
More like a little reading, a lot of prevarication, and shovel loads of bullshit.

Magic(k): made up unsubstantiated bullshit (or pseudo pop-psychology depending on precisely which branch you're talking about)
Homeopathy: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and the placebo effect
Ghosts: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
UFOs: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Cryptozoology: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Reiki: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and the placebo effect
Astrology: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and cold reading
Alchemy: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Religion: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Astral projection: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Ley lines: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Dowsing: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Psychics: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Telekinesis: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
...
I'm spotting a pattern here ;)
What else, I'm sure I've missed a whole bunch of pseudoscientific choprawoo.

Id love to hear about the one(s) that have been tested over and over (and not confirmed to be just something someone made up ... seeing as all those listed have been tested time and again and been shown to be precisely that).
Good deals done with all these guys
Canada, we put the "u" in satire
User avatar
Scruffie
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4647
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:46 pm
Location: London.. ish, Uk

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by Scruffie »

Didn't they decide ghosts were a particular resonant frequency that disrupted your corneas and made you see shit and also happened to cause a feeling of dread.
User avatar
Derelict78
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Cadillac, MI

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by Derelict78 »

devnulljp wrote:
Derelict78 wrote:esoterics is not something thats just "made up" Some yeah but a lot has been tested over and over.
Such as .... ?
Derelict78 wrote:"A lot of it is just cold reading anyway" it is a very small amount of reading and a LOT of work
More like a little reading, a lot of prevarication, and shovel loads of bullshit.

Magic(k): made up unsubstantiated bullshit (or pseudo pop-psychology depending on precisely which branch you're talking about)
Homeopathy: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and the placebo effect
Ghosts: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
UFOs: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Cryptozoology: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Reiki: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and the placebo effect
Astrology: made up unsubstantiated bullshit and cold reading
Alchemy: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Religion: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Astral projection: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Ley lines: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Dowsing: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Psychics: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
Telekinesis: made up unsubstantiated bullshit
...
I'm spotting a pattern here ;)
What else, I'm sure I've missed a whole bunch of pseudoscientific choprawoo.

Id love to hear about the one(s) that have been tested over and over (and not confirmed to be just something someone made up ... seeing as all those listed have been tested time and again and been shown to be precisely that).


I dont have much time to write a full post (ill be back when my Daughter goes to sleep) but it seems like you just made up a bunch of shit and did little to no research
Image
aen wrote:Or I'll just use fuzz. Then Ill sound cool regardless.
Achtane wrote:Well, volcanoes are pretty fuckin' cool. Like I guess lava flows are doomy. Slow and still able to to melt your eardrums.
User avatar
devnulljp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3989
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by devnulljp »

Derelict78 wrote:...it seems like you just made up a bunch of shit and did little to no research
Ah, the bounces off me and sticks to you like glue defence? That's me told I suppose. :lol:
Good deals done with all these guys
Canada, we put the "u" in satire
User avatar
gunslinger_burrito
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2756
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by gunslinger_burrito »

Scruffie wrote:Didn't they decide ghosts were a particular resonant frequency that disrupted your corneas and made you see shit and also happened to cause a feeling of dread.


I haven't heard that one. Sounds interesting. But in my readings of various neuroscience books, there's a common and somewhat widely accepted theory out there that goes like this:
Your brain kind of does things in a feelings/instincts first kind of way, then you rationalize whatever your feelings/instincts did. More or less. So it's better for you to think "oh shit! danger!" then "hey was that a gust of wind right when the light bulb blew?" The theory is that it's more or less an ancient survival mechanism. Better to think there's a tiger in the bushes and be wrong, then to not think there's a tiger in the bushes and get eaten.

As to the preceding debate:
Derelict78 wrote:"A lot of it is just cold reading anyway" it is a very small amount of reading and a LOT of work


Maybe for the reader, but not for the subject of the reading. Some cold readers actually believe their own BS, some realize that they can trick people and make a ton of cash. I assume that it's accepted among most of us here (no offense if not...) that things like astrology work because we infer our own meaning. That's what devnulljp was getting at, I assume. There have been times where professors give their students each an individual horoscope (a Cancer horoscope for someone born mid-July, etc...) and told them not to share with their neighbors. They then asked the students to raise their hands if the horoscope was accurate, or described them well, or whatever. Most raised their hands. The professor(s) then delivered the punch-line, saying that each student got the same horoscope. People who are "cold-read" do most of the work themselves, because they want to believe it.

My philosophy or whatever you want to call it, is that if something works for you, makes your life better, easier, etc then use it. If it doesn't work or makes things worse, take another route. To that end, if someone wants to use Tarot cards or runes crystal balls or dolphin spirits or whatever, who gives a shit, as long as they're not imposing on me. If people are dumb enough to follow the bad/stupid people out there, then it's their loss. Debunking things is interesting, but there will probably always be an element of BS in the world, and a group of people, who, for any number of reasons, choose to accept it.

I'll make the bullseye on my head even bigger....
On a similar note, the psychodrama-aspect of magic, or as devnulljp put it
pseudo pop-psychology

amounts to pretending, with a goal in sight. Once again, the practitioner or actor/whatever has to really want their desired outcome, to the point where they become emotionally involved in the act. Next, one of two things typically will happen:
a: they feel a sense of fulfillment and no longer really want what they desired (like your lowered libido and indifference after masturbation or sex) and can thus go about their business without their goal hampering their thoughts.
b: they still are handicapped by their obsessions, and nothing seems to work, in which case, a smart practitioner will have learned something about them self. Namely, that they don't really want their desired outcome as much as they revel in a masochistic chase for it. Or else the adage "a perfect fantasy is sometimes better than an imperfect reality" holds sway.
That adage is another use of psychodrama-magic.

These are vague outlines of the general idea, and they sure as shit aren't for everyone. But they work for me, and when they don't, I learn something new.
Lastly, "I may be crazy, but I'm not stupid," should apply to these practitioners. Just because someone ritualized a profound desire for whatever doesn't mean that they should actually expect it to appear in their living room or whatever. It's about the psychological effect.
User avatar
gunslinger_burrito
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2756
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by gunslinger_burrito »

This:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpaN6YIf5PI[/youtube]

and this, if ya got time to kill. You could mostly just listen to it, too.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA5_Xk5nr4E[/youtube]
User avatar
devnulljp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3989
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by devnulljp »

While we're waiting ... here's a quick summary of why the (potential) Higgs boson discovery is important

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magaz ... ern-boson/

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magaz ... -thatcher/
Good deals done with all these guys
Canada, we put the "u" in satire
User avatar
theavondon
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 10742
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Esoterics // Superstition

Post by theavondon »

devnulljp wrote:While we're waiting ... here's a quick summary of why the (potential) Higgs boson discovery is important

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magaz ... ern-boson/

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magaz ... -thatcher/


Oooh, actual science!
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
Post Reply