our flag

counterdestroy · Post by **counterdestroy** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:56 pm

siamesegun wrote:I used a condom yesterday for the first time in two and a half years on a whim.

Took it off after a few pumps.

Fuck condoms.

I haven't been able to focus on any posts after this one

eatyourguitar · Post by **eatyourguitar** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:50 pm

rupert murdock wasn't even a US citizen when he started taking over america. so he got his citizenship and continued to buy up everything. then they found out that because News Corp (how the hell does fox news even call themselves News Corporation) was an australian company it was still illegal what he was doing.

In 1995, Murdoch's Fox Network became the object of scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), when it was alleged that News Ltd.'s Australian base made Murdoch's ownership of Fox illegal. However, the FCC ruled in Murdoch's favor, stating that his ownership of Fox was in the best interests of the public

and everyone knows that fox news holds themselves to very high ethical standards and would never try to make money in a way that would be a disservice to the american people. /sarcasm. how much does the fcc cost? this man bought myspace at its peak. imagine for a second how facebook knows everything about 2/3rds the people on the planet. yeah that was almost Rupert Murdoch. the CIA saw the potential for information gathering and profit so they created facebook. the old facebook terms of service actually states that they are giving all your information to the government aggregation service pursuant to federal law.

Toonster · Post by **Toonster** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:14 pm

Murdock?

eatyourguitar · Post by **eatyourguitar** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:23 pm

yeah just flame it before you actually stop to think about it. that way if it is true, you'll just bury the message in flames. thats why I need to just shut up. I always get stuck in the middle of these threads.

metalmariachi · Post by **metalmariachi** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:48 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04BCeqBC-ZA[/youtube]

remember I am Colonel Flagg.

MM

unownunown · Post by **unownunown** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:54 am

eatyourguitar wrote:the CIA saw the potential for information gathering and profit so they created facebook. the old facebook terms of service actually states that they are giving all your information to the government aggregation service pursuant to federal law.

the cia does not need facebook to creep on you.

although facebook is definitely sketchy, but for other reasons. mark zuckerberg is kind of an enormous prick.

almost every single users agreement thang has a clause saying that they will give up your information to the government if necessary. this is in case you solicit people through facebook and then kill them or whatever. they have to comply with authorities, pursuant to federal law. i'm sure the new users agreement says that too.

even the itunes users agreement has something in there about how you can not use itunes to make bombs. it's just covering their asses legally. it does not mean they are giving up all your information, although it means they could if they wanted to. but honestly the CIA does not need facebook to do what they do.

eatyourguitar · Post by **eatyourguitar** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:41 am

another knee jerk reaction, a simple google search, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that every round of funding was given to facebook by the CIA through CIA owned companies. its right on the website of a CIA venture capital. they make the connection all by themselves. thats 2 out of 2 people that wanted to doubt the facts and just too lazy to type facebook cia in a google search. the cia has us all believing mark zuckerberg is a loveable naive college student. harmless. mission accomplished. how many people saw that facebook movie that doesn't mention the CIA funding at all. with out the $51,000,000 (probably a lot more by now) I dont think facebook ever had a chance. so why is it not in the movie?

StudioShutIn · Post by **StudioShutIn** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:37 pm

unownunown wrote:although facebook is definitely sketchy, but for other reasons. mark zuckerberg is kind of an enormous prick.

How so?

Mudfuzz · Post by **Mudfuzz** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:01 pm

StudioShutIn wrote:
unownunown wrote:although facebook is definitely sketchy, but for other reasons. mark zuckerberg is kind of an enormous prick.

How so?

Look up way FB was created in the first place....

snipelfritz · Post by **snipelfritz** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:52 pm

Well, if the CIA put that much money into it, don't you think they're a little disappointed now? I mean, not that many people put any really important info online, and anyways, what are they going to do? Search, "jihad" or "let's blow up New England!"? I think the best thing to do to stop them is spam them with app invites. Farmville against Fascists, eh?

Mudfuzz · Post by **Mudfuzz** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:57 pm

snipelfritz wrote:Well, if the CIA put that much money into it, don't you think they're a little disappointed now?

Nah it started out "we's gunn's catch us some turrists" but they all started looking up all the people they went to high school and stuff and got side tracked...

siamesegun · Post by **siamesegun** » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:07 pm

counterdestroy wrote:
siamesegun wrote:I used a condom yesterday for the first time in two and a half years on a whim.

Took it off after a few pumps.

Fuck condoms.

I haven't been able to focus on any posts after this one

D'Awww!!! You're sweet!!!

:!!!:

snipelfritz · Post by **snipelfritz** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:42 am

Mudfuzz wrote:
snipelfritz wrote:Well, if the CIA put that much money into it, don't you think they're a little disappointed now?

Nah it started out "we's gunn's catch us some turrists" but they all started looking up all the people they went to high school and stuff and got side tracked...

Exactly what I was thinking. And your avatar, also exactly what I was thinking :thumb:

lol, wut was this thread about again? How birth control is trying to enslave our free market economy? Was that it?

If so, we should print, picture of Stalin on condoms. Actually...either way, we should have pictures of Stalin winking at you when you pull a rubber out of the package. Like he's saying, "Good job. Now, go and ravage that which you have conquered."

eatyourguitar · Post by **eatyourguitar** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:47 am

snipelfritz wrote:lol, wut was this thread about again? How birth control is trying to enslave our free market economy? Was that it?

If so, we should print, picture of Stalin on condoms. Actually...either way, we should have pictures of Stalin winking at you when you pull a rubber out of the package. Like he's saying, "Good job. Now, go and ravage that which you have conquered."

on a serious note though, all the war mongering presidents have been pro-life anti-condom. pro poverty. if everyone wore condoms and had good jobs, they would have to either rase the average military pay or use the draft.

Mudfuzz · Post by **Mudfuzz** » Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:56 am

eatyourguitar wrote:
snipelfritz wrote:lol, wut was this thread about again? How birth control is trying to enslave our free market economy? Was that it?

If so, we should print, picture of Stalin on condoms. Actually...either way, we should have pictures of Stalin winking at you when you pull a rubber out of the package. Like he's saying, "Good job. Now, go and ravage that which you have conquered."

on a serious note though, all the war mongering presidents have been pro-life anti-condom. pro poverty. if everyone wore condoms and had good jobs, they would have to either rase the average military pay or use the draft.

Which would make people protest... and actually take a real interest in what the government actually does and why... maybe...

ilovefuzz.com

our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag

Re: our flag