Prop 8 Overturned

[Big Mon]

:lol: y'all soo stoooopid! personal politics aside,what I wanna know is will there be another run of the Big Gay Fuzz to commemorate such a ruling,which favors the inalienable human right to fall in love? Teabaggers,even?

man. what does marriage have to do w/ falling in love. really. if anything. its an odious institution that serves a mode of patriarchy. nothing more.

no one seems to want to celebrate that the Dano dude is out 10 grand. okay fine.

if the current President actually grew a pair & either signed an executive order into law or had Rahmbo force a bill thru the DEMOCRATICALLY-controlled Congress Federally--i know elbandito is pre-cumming at the mere mention of the word FEDERAL--mandated that same-sex marriages be legal in ALL 50 STATES instead of this stupid-ass GAME that has been going on in California for YEARS now. well...i mean...

furthermore. i challenge anyone on ILF to a DDF same-sex (or queer) fuck fest (or orgy) anytime anyplace anywhere. you can't out freak me ever not even in your wildest dreams.

All I was saying,Hanson,is that I wanna see a celebratory Big Gay Fuzz limited run. What's falling in love got to do with marriage? Well,sometimes a lot,sometimes,maybe not so much. Depends. No,there never should have been a ban on gay marriage in the first place. Granted. But marriage is not always an"odious institution that seves a mode of patriarchy". If that's the case,someone is getting married for the wrong reasons. And yeah,that happens. No argument there. Chill the fuck out,dude. The shitpot's been stirred,mission accomplished,right? Yeah,the pres. should grow a pair. Human rights are human rights. I wouldn't exactly take you up on your same sex orgy challenge,but I'm quite sure I'd match(or even surpass)you in the freakiness department,chump

[devnulljp]

I'm not so sure -- I was pretty freaked out the first time I saw a beetle torture phallus or the armoured genitals of the dung fly.

NSFW (if you work with arthropods

[floating opera]

very well. i look forward to see what the 'mods' actually do in this particular case.

Your post was a pornographic image. It was deleted. I don't know exactly what happened to make you think it'd be acceptable to post that, but it's not.

As for now I've notified Tom of what happened.

A) that PG-13 pic showed absolutely NO genitalia, unless of course you consider a bare bum genitalia, no penetration or gestures of penetration. deeming it pornographic is really rather closed-minded & reactionary.

B) it was merely an artistic representation of two buff, muscular dudes expressing their love for one another. i thought it was extremely apropos & quite classy otherwise i would not have posted it. i think it is actually discriminatory and borderline homophobic to have deleted it but then again that's my opinion--

nonetheless. PP you are doing an EXCELLENT jobby job keep up the good work !!!

[floating opera]

All I was saying,Hanson,is...

how do you know my real name ???

[Big Mon]

All I was saying,Hanson,is...

how do you know my real name ???

[steevdeadman]

bloooooo knows all...............................................................

[devi ever]

[Sockgazer]

I agree with Floating Opera to an extent(though I've no clue what he's saying); and would like to say that part of the problem with things like Prop 8 is being uppity about things. For example, there's nothing wrong with this image.

[Sockgazer]

Or this.

[Sockgazer]

And certainly not this:

[Mudfuzz]

[Sockgazer]

Cho Aniki FTW.

All of those are googlesafe, btw.

[Mudfuzz]

I know..
still...
.... this thread is becoming >

[FuzzHugger]

very well. i look forward to see what the 'mods' actually do in this particular case.

Your post was a pornographic image. It was deleted. I don't know exactly what happened to make you think it'd be acceptable to post that, but it's not.

As for now I've notified Tom of what happened.

A) that PG-13 pic showed absolutely NO genitalia, unless of course you consider a bare bum genitalia, no penetration or gestures of penetration. deeming it pornographic is really rather closed-minded & reactionary.

B) it was merely an artistic representation of two buff, muscular dudes expressing their love for one another. i thought it was extremely apropos & quite classy otherwise i would not have posted it. i think it is actually discriminatory and borderline homophobic to have deleted it but then again that's my opinion--

nonetheless. PP you are doing an EXCELLENT jobby job keep up the good work !!!

PP did precisely the right thing.

The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.

I'm fine with muscle dude pics, kissing pics, whatever, as long as the intent isn't to inspire homophobia. Though there's really no need to post an animated gif of butt licking during a discussion about Prop 8.

ILF is one of the most LGBT friendly forums around, but we do have minors here, and people who just don't want to see anyone licking butt. Things like that (gay OR straight) will be deleted.

[Companda]

The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.

If I were the kind of person to put quotes in my "signature", this would be it.