2017: Great movie year?

General discussion at the Wang Bar.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
kaeth
committed
committed
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by kaeth »

Keanu Reeves is good in the sense that he meets the requirements of the roles he takes. He's an appropriate actor. Same reason Under the Skin was good. The role didn't call for a lot of intense acting in the first place.
User avatar
Andrew
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2748
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:43 am
Location: Sydney, Auslandia

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Andrew »

I like Keanu a lot, while he's competent as an actor but he still comes across as being a sincere enough as a dude on and off the screen so makes it much easier to enjoy his work. It's the difference between him and Tom Cruise, they're both okay actors and both are known to have a solid work ethic. But people still get pretty judgey with Cruise and Keanu buys his stunt crew motorbikes. :idk:
User avatar
Iommic Pope
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11400
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: Frimmin' on the Fram

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Iommic Pope »

Andrew wrote:I like Keanu a lot, while he's competent as an actor but he still comes across as being a sincere enough as a dude on and off the screen so that probably helps enjoy is work. It's the difference between him an Tom Cruise, they're both okay and both are known to give their work their all. But people still get pretty judgey with Cruise. :idk:
This.
WWPD?
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote: I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
User avatar
jrfox92
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by jrfox92 »

The fact that pictures tend to randomly pop up of Keanu just riding the train like he's not a celebrity is a big plus to me.
Since I always forget:
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
User avatar
Iommic Pope
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11400
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: Frimmin' on the Fram

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Iommic Pope »

He seems like a cool guy.
Whereas Mr. Cruise does not.
WWPD?
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote: I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
User avatar
Olin
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 4:38 pm
Location: Below/Between
Contact:

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Olin »

Andrew wrote:I like Keanu a lot, while he's competent as an actor but he still comes across as being a sincere enough as a dude on and off the screen so makes it much easier to enjoy his work. It's the difference between him and Tom Cruise, they're both okay actors and both are known to have a solid work ethic. But people still get pretty judgey with Cruise and Keanu buys his stunt crew motorbikes. :idk:

Yep, pretty much the same thing. There's also a difference between not considering her a shit actress and considering her a good actress, but nice arbitrary assumption.
neonblack wrote:Do you ever just sit back and take a good look at yourself and realize all your riffs are shit and you're a garbage musician?
https://barewireson.bandcamp.com/album/off-black
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by actual »

Really dude? Okay, she''s not a great actress, but why porn? Is that the only thing a girl with her looks and person would be suitable for?
I hate to be that guy, but c'mon.
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by tremolo3 »

:lol: no, I'm not kidding, I can't simply enjoy actors who repeat themselves over and over. If they could only say "no" when they get offers for samey characters.
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
jrfox92
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by jrfox92 »

tremolo3 wrote:If they could only say "no" when they get offers for samey characters.
Then they'd all be broke. :idk:
Since I always forget:
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
User avatar
Bloodhammer
committed
committed
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 5:36 pm
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Bloodhammer »

tremolo3 wrote::lol: no, I'm not kidding, I can't simply enjoy actors who repeat themselves over and over. If they could only say "no" when they get offers for samey characters.
I take it you're a big Nicholas Cage fan. :lol:


I really think the director has more to do with badly played roles than the actors in a lot of movies. I blame Len Wiseman completely for the failure of the 2012 remake of Total Recall. I've seen with my own eyes that Colin Farrell can actually act (In Bruges) and Kate Beckinsale did okay in Stonehearst Asylum, so she can at least do better than she did in TR. Bryan Cranston was undeniably the greatest actor involved, but even he couldn't save that schlock fest.

When I think of Megan Fox, I think of Transformers. Which makes me think of Michael Bay. I don't know what else she's in.

But Michael Bay. :facepalm:
User avatar
jrfox92
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by jrfox92 »

Bloodhammer wrote: When I think of Megan Fox, I think of Transformers. Which makes me think of Michael Bay. I don't know what else she's in.
Jennifer's Body. :idk:
I remember that a handful of people watched that, but I have absolutely no idea what happened or if she was even viewed as passable.
Since I always forget:
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
User avatar
Blackened Soul
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 1:41 am
Location: puget sound where even the moss is covered in moss
Contact:

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by Blackened Soul »

vidret wrote:tom cruise is a good actor, if not a great one.
and this is actually food acording to some.
Image
Bloodhammer wrote:
tremolo3 wrote::lol: no, I'm not kidding, I can't simply enjoy actors who repeat themselves over and over. If they could only say "no" when they get offers for samey characters.
I take it you're a big Nicholas Cage fan. :lol:


I really think the director has more to do with badly played roles than the actors in a lot of movies. I blame Len Wiseman completely for the failure of the 2012 remake of Total Recall. I've seen with my own eyes that Colin Farrell can actually act (In Bruges) and Kate Beckinsale did okay in Stonehearst Asylum, so she can at least do better than she did in TR. Bryan Cranston was undeniably the greatest actor involved, but even he couldn't save that schlock fest.

When I think of Megan Fox, I think of Transformers. Which makes me think of Michael Bay. I don't know what else she's in.

But Michael Bay. :facepalm:
I agree-ish... and I'd say more pre-underworld Kate Beckinsale movies show that she is better then what she normally does anymore..
I fucking hate all those fucking trans-bot movies, who can even tell if the actors can act, the movies are bags of moldy puss covered tampons.
And.. in defense of the actors in GITS, they did ok considering... the writing [I mean really it's like they got an unpaid interim to write down highlights from the other movies/tv and wrote a screenplay from them], the directing, the production, the over-reliance on bad CG, lame filtering and overuse of hound dogs.
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by actual »

You didn't have to pick an alternate career, yet you did. You even said she was 'made' for it. That says it all.
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by actual »

Lol ok.
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
jrfox92
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:23 am

Re: 2017: Great movie year?

Post by jrfox92 »

You've been on the forum for nearly a year and you still don't get vidret, yet, idiot?
Since I always forget:
Inconuucl wrote:You can't kill Strymon, it'll just resurrect 3 days later.
BitchPudding wrote:Despite all my rage, I am still just eating tacos in a cage.
Inconuucl wrote:Welcome to ilf, we have three jokes and twelve posters. <3
Post Reply