Well, at least, they're releasing the Amelia Earhart files...

D.o.S. · Post by **D.o.S.** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:43 am

Jwar do you read/check 538?

John · Post by **John** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:48 am

The most important issue is the environment, because regardless of our political or religious beliefs, we all have to live here and have clean air and water. I think Clinton will do sneaky underhanded shit that will hurt the planet, but will have to dial it back to maintain her "progressive" image, and will have to deal with pressure and expectations from the Left. I think Trump will do overt, spiteful things to the environment, like Coal Rolling on a national level.

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:57 am

D.o.S. wrote:Jwar do you read/check 538?

I do read.

Now what's 538? LOL

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:59 am

Just found it.

I never know how accurate polling is. I just was basing what I said on the voter turn out so far in early voting in FL, which I don't believe is even over.

Chankgeez · Post by **Chankgeez** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:00 am

John wrote:The most important issue is the environment...

If that's the case, we're all fucked.

Niether Trump nor Clinton are especially friendly towards the environment. I don't think Clinton really has a "progressive" image. Maybe compared to Trump?

She makes concessions to environmental issues because she fears losing those voters concerned about the environment otherwise.

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:02 am

Chankgeez wrote:
John wrote:The most important issue is the environment...
If that's the case, we're all fucked.

Niether Trump nor Clinton are especially friendly towards the environment. I don't think Clinton really has a "progressive" image. Maybe compared to Trump?

She makes concessions to environmental issues because she fears losing those voters concerned about the environment otherwise.

I agree with John and they didn't even once talk about it. Sad, sad, sad.

Strange Tales · Post by **Strange Tales** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:07 am

https://theringer.com/electing-hillary- ... .212lpxhwk

I think this article brings up the great point that the GOP is basically tied to the insane radicals that want stuff like the government to default (Jesus thank god they didn't) and that everyone running as a Republican is basically boned unless they pander to this.

I think the only answer is to purge humanity

jrfox92 · Post by **jrfox92** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:25 am

I half expect Trump to turn into the next Ron Paul if he loses: runs every year, pulls the crazy votes from the Republicans, says stupid things when everyone's forgotten about him, etc.
I'm hopeful that a new brand of Republican/closet Libertarian spawns from the fractured GOP that ultimately leads to pushing someone like Rand Paul out into the public eye.
It'd be interesting to see another faction that's not quite nuts, but not quite sane either.

D.o.S. · Post by **D.o.S.** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:40 am

I think my favorite bumpersticker from this election has been "Libertarianism is astrology for men."

jrfox92 · Post by **jrfox92** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:19 am

D.o.S. wrote:I think my favorite bumpersticker from this election has been "Libertarianism is astrology for men."

I want that bumper sticker.

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:02 pm

FBI just reopened the case against Hillary with 11 days to go??? I wonder what this means! I can't find any good answers. So fucking crazy!

jrfox92 · Post by **jrfox92** » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:10 pm

Comey got fired?

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:12 pm

NOPE! He reopened the case.

Chankgeez · Post by **Chankgeez** » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:15 pm

Yeah, it's a little cray.

snipelfritz · Post by **snipelfritz** » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:29 pm

Based on what evidence?

I can hardly imagine wikileaks' stolen emails are admissible in court.

ilovefuzz.com

Well, at least, they're releasing the Amelia Earhart files...

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?

Re: Who's the nastiest POTUSman or POTUSwoman in the land?