Seems to me like someone is already "alleged" as soon as the accusation is made. Accusers are routinely shamed, doubted, mocked and harassed to a ridiculous degree. So much so that it makes it seem extremely unlikely to me that there is any really great percentage of people going around making false accusations for ulterior motive. I think you would have to be literally crazy to bring down on yourself the shit that accusers face just to fuck with someone by making a false accusation. And a lot of accusers are fully aware of the shitstorm that they will be bringing down on themselves.vidret wrote:really? i try hard not to take sides, but it feels very much like someone can accuse and everyone picks it up and now that person is an "alleged rapist" or what have you, and if it's not proven/disproven then that person will always be an alleged rapist, which is fucked up as well.ritz wrote:I always err on the side of believing the accuser, unless there is some *drastic* reason for reasonable doubt. Because it often seems that the entire culture I live in tends to do the opposite.
So yeah, I chose to believe accusers. It's not like my belief actually matters either way, but it feels right to me. Maybe that makes me wrong 1 time in 10? 1 in 50? Versus routinely choosing to disbelieve? No thanks.
I also try to see complexity and nuance in these situations. I believe that a victim can honestly believe that they were raped, and the rapist can honestly believe that they did not rape, and they are having vastly different subjective experiences of the same complicated incident, but someone doesn't have to believe that they were a rapist in order to make it legitimately rape for the victim. This shit is complicated.
Understand that I am approaching this in the abstract. Don't know any of the people involved, etc.





