MrNovember wrote:Holy shit, just got back from seeing Dune. Absolutely did the book more justice than I was expecting. I loved it and I had really high expectations going into it. I actually really want to go see it again
MechaGodzilla wrote:i fuckin loved dune. catch it in imax/dolby if you can as the regular version lost a lot of colour depth. source:me, who saw it twice this week

Blackened Soul wrote:Whached the Nu-Dune on max..
Visuals: A
Pacing: C- [it feels like they copied the new blade runner]
Sound/Music: C sound effects are great but musically I feel an ILF compilation of us all jamming would have done as good a job
Acting: C, It's hard to tell if the acting was wooden or the directing was limp
Adaptation: C- Wile it have more scenes from the book than David Lynch's one without knowing the book I feel you'd be saying WTF is going on.
At least with David Lynch's version you have the thought dialog going in the silent parts which in the book if half of the fucking dialog in the
fucking story!
Cast: D Atleast with David Lynch's version he picked GOOD veteran film and stage actors to balance with the shitty eye candy actors, just like the original starwars tril, Harry Potter and lOrd of the wrings.
Conclusion: another overblown remake with no new ideas to be forgotten in a sea of remakes with no new ideas other than BLOOMEXPLOSION!
Well, the director is the same as the new Blade Runner so I guess some similarities in style are unavoidable

Cast was not amazing nor terrible, (except Jason Momoa who is capable of doing only the same role in each movie he appears in)
Re-adaptation: i found it captured the general mood of the book, and I really appreciated the absence of "explanation dialogues", which has become more and more popular and annoying in the vast majority of the movies right now. I don't know if I could have understood everything if I didn't read the book, but I loved that most of the things were explained "visually" instead of using words etc.