Moderator: Ghost Hip
Lurker13 wrote:Duo Sonics are not Mustangs. They are the same scale and about the same size, but they are different guitars.
1) The bodies are different - Mustangs are offsets, Duo Sonics are not.
2) They have different pickups.
3) The bridge pickup placement on the Mustang is slanted, the current Duo Sonic's is not slanted, although the older ones' were slanted.
4) The pickguards have different shapes.
Also, some Mustangs are hardtails.[/img]
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
Gone Fission wrote:Counterpoint: the Duo Sonic II produced from 64-68 has a body that looks like the Mustang with offset waist, has a slanted bridge pickup, and has the Mustang pickguard and switching. Can’t tell you if the pickups were different, but that would seem odd for Fender in that era. The recent hard tail Mustangs would probably be Duo Sonic II’s if it had been a more popular model. There are no vintage era Mustangs with a hard tail.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Hey man, you can do what you want in this den of shame.
dubkitty wrote:as noted in the other thread, i love my Lead II to pieces. it's regular Fender scale, though, which may be outside your area of interest.
Lurker13 wrote:This is one of those cases were someone customizes a guitar to their taste and then claims that increased the resale value.
dub wrote:Doesn't really fit your bill (HBs and strat trem) but I really enjoyed the supersonic I had years ago, very light and comfortable to play; one of the best necks ever for me.
dub wrote:Also, putting 9's on a shortscale. A sign of the unhinged.
PeterBregman wrote:Turns out El Diablo (guitar shop in Minneapolis) has a nice '93 Duo Sonic in the shop. Just played it, and it's real nice. It's even shorter scale though - 22.75"! Part of me wonders if that's too short, but it did feel nice in the shop. It was a nice vintage white too...plus it has cred because '93 is vintage now, right?
I've got some thinking to do.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Hey man, you can do what you want in this den of shame.
PeterBregman wrote: It's even shorter scale though - 22.75"! Part of me wonders if that's too short, but it did feel nice in the shop.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Also, putting 9's on a shortscale. A sign of the unhinged.
dubkitty wrote: you have to click them out like a 60s/70s R&B guitarist.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Hey man, you can do what you want in this den of shame.
PeterBregman wrote:
I went ahead and did it. It was calling to me. That case had a small part in the decision too. '93 Duo Sonic.
Side note: After lots of research, I discovered that the 22.7" scale neck on the 90's Duo Sonic is a CONVERSION neck. It's a 25.5" scale minus the first two frets. What that means is that if the tiny neck proves to be too small, I could theoretically put a Warmoth 24.75" conversion neck on it. Could be fun.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests