Christophe wrote:Thanks! That first listing looks rad.
edit: It looks like it's the kind of thing I'm looking for, only it's a fixed setting /or using an exp pedal. There's no built-in possibility to have parameter ramping (like on a CB or Dr scientist)... But maybe I could deal with that.
Do you mean I should be looking at a MS-20 filter clone if I want "dramatic" ? I could hunt down schematics and have one built... How far away from that would Dusk be?
Well, i thought from your OP that you were specifically into the MS-20, but yes, i suppose you could characterize it as dramatic - more intense feedback, sharper q, squelchier, a bit more saturated and chaotic; all as compared to your garden variety normy normington filter, yass i'd agree. i think you'd probs want to do some comparison listening to the polivoks, wasp, maybe a steiner parker if you can find one, in pedalworld. i mean, in general you can both find filters that are rigged to be more dramatic and that can be patched up in ways to enhance the drama in modular/eurorack, but as for things available in pedals, an ms-20 based one would be a good start....
can't really speak to Dusk - i've been avoiding it bc i don't want another filter to lust after....
have you checked out the new Dreadbox Disorder i posted on in the new gear 2022 thread - that one seems a bit of a drama queen
thing is - i'm not sure whether drama is exactly what your lookin' for - the vongon paragraphs you mention is certainly beautiful, lovely, a sparkling wit - but not imo particularly dramatic.... idk want to try to read your mind tho
full disclosure - i tend to like filters that might get slagged as "not having character" or being "weak" - i'm not into using filters for extreme tone slicing or signifying aggro and i don't need them to "cut"- i'm content to leave that role for fuzz, and normally i want filters to create a sense of movement, or take some of the edge off, or shape the "body" of a sound to be a bit less electronic sounding. so for me, the Paragraphs is an excellent match, and i really like the Protostar as well (also liked ye olde ILF classick Subdecay Proteus for much the same reasons). not that i'm against getting a little filter jiggy once in awhile - i've got pedal versions of the Wasp and Polivoks for that - i tend to use them set for extreme filtering but in a static mode rather than combining both extreme filtering and movement...pardon my tan pants. i also don't much like the standard wah wah sound for much the same reasons
doesn't stop me from using filters often and intensively tho
as for expression-in vs built-in modulation, unless i was really restricted on space or budget i'd (as in me personally, not the abstract lectured-to "i") tend to favor the expression in; that way you can roll your own wiggles, waves or warbles using external lfo sources or sequencers, whereas the modulation capabilities built in by even the more generous makers as ChaseBliss for example are ultimately going to be somewhat more limited because of the necessary compromises forced by form factor, parts, other practical considerations, or market analysis.
so, it's a bit of a trade-off really.... for many people, the smaller, more self-contained, maybe all-around cheaper device is going to be the winner. for others, it's hard enough finding a filter that sounds and feels right for them without having to fit in particular needs/desires re: modulation...so finding the filter that sounds and feels right with an open door in the form of a cv/expression input is the winning play...
...and that really is enough word salad from me
ugh, i hope any of that was helpful...sleepless posting is not a good look for me.
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."