Page 1 of 1

TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:09 pm
by rustywire
I've been inspired by Alan Parsons to make this thread.
DSOTM and Tales of Mystery & Imagination...EAP are both meaningful musical milestones, personally and profoundly.
His legacy reads like a who's who, but I was reminded of an important lesson.
Even legends who are responsible for masterpieces and great vision make disagreeable...even questionable personal choices. Choosing for others is where things get more complicated with guesswork.

The vid is short but the catalyst is 2:13 https://youtu.be/oTcmNsV7lUg?t=2m13s

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTcmNsV7lUg[/youtube]

Vid is from 4 years ago, but in context it's still a mixed bag of gems, snax and turds.

Good recommendations: Motif, KRK monitors
Great recs: MBP+Duet 2.
Bad rec: No room treatment
WTF rec: POD

:whoa:

I didn't go on that deep dive for followup vids/pics...but nothing turned up from cursory searches :idk:
[curiosity intensifies]

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:31 pm
by popvulture
The POD thing doesn't surprise me though... prog guys have a habit of embracing technology waaaaay to a fault, it seems. Not that a POD is even a horrible thing to have, but to use as a source of guitar tones in a studio = great way to sound totally canned.

That said, of course that quest for the forefront of tech cheesiness can lead so some, for lack of a better phrase, fun cheese.

And fuck yeah Apogee.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:44 pm
by D.o.S.
Counterpoint: Jesu's guitar on Conqueror is POD.

And SOOOOURCE:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070824135 ... 39_196.php
Maelstrom: Obviously, with Jesu it’s just as much what it sounds like as what you’re playing. Let’s start by talking about how you recorded your parts when you went into the studio.

Justin Broadrick: I’ve got my own studio, so it’s very hands-on. I’ve had it since 1991, when I started on a Tascam 688 cassette-based machine. Now it’s virtually all computer based, like on Macintosh G5. I have a lot of outboard stuff as well. On the Jesu album, the guitars were 90 percent DI, using POD. This was one of the two big things for me on the Jesu album, the other being AmpliTube. I used those extensively, much more so than micing up a Marshall [guitar amp], which is ironically what I spent virtually all my career doing in Godflesh.

Maelstrom: It seems to be a near universal opinion that POD isn’t the same as micing up a real amp, but that the convenience of the thing makes it very attractive, like not having to make a ton of noise. But I hear you saying that even if you had the choice, you’d use the POD.

Justin Broadrick: See, that’s it for me. Initially, I must admit it was convenience that led me to record with a POD XT Pro. I could be in the studio at 3 in the morning recording songs, because I was completely inspired, as opposed to having to wait until the right time of the day to do a part with a Marshall up at full blast.

Maelstrom: So I guess your studio is also where you live.

Justin Broadrick: Yes. Since I moved to North Wales, my studio is quite literally in what would be a bedroom. Fortunately, it’s in a detached house, so I can make a lot of racket. But still, I was getting so fucking bored with mic placement and the Marshall amp, and blablablablabla. I sort of got really disillusioned with it – to me, when I make records, I have to do it when I want to do it, and not this pocket of time that I have to cram everything into. I spent time in the late 80s and early 90s going into studios, being forced to record in a certain amount of time, get the fuck out, come back, mix it, get the fuck out again, and then spend the next four years moaning about the record.

Maelstrom: HAHAHAH!

Justin Broadrick: It just has to be done your own way. I want to do these things when I want to do them. What I used quite often with the POD was putting the signal head of the POD into an Avalon compressor. I have a big Avalon vacuum tube unit; I put my vocals into it, and I quite often run my guitars into it as well. Obviously, the Avalon alone costs about as much as my G5. It warms up the signal and boosts the frequencies, and it sounds like it’s got multiple pre-amps on it. I also use a Joe Meek compressor, one of the larger, more expensive ones; not one of the tiny ones. Putting those in a chain with the POD gives me so much more control over the tone than I ever had with micing up a Marshall. For me it’s a lot more exciting: it’s not only convenient, I’m really happy with the tones I get. I’m spending even more time working on these tones for the next Jesu record. And there’s no looking back. I do not go anywhere near mic placement at all.

Maelstrom: What were you struggling with? What did you find that worked, and did it consistently work?

Justin Broadrick: I’ve never banged my head so much against walls as with which mic to use and where to place. I never worked it out. With Godflesh, it was like one day I could turn on the studio, have the Marshall in the bathroom, with an SM 58 about three inches above the cone, and it would sound amazing, and I thought, “wow. That’s the tone I’m looking for.” Shut down the studio, come back the following day, turn it all back on, nothing has moved whatsoever, and the tone is shit. And I’d just be like, “what is this all about? Did I not warm up the Marshall long enough? Is it this? Is it that?” I was so fed up of going through the chain. There were so many Godflesh records that were made where, to be honest, I just put up with it. I got used to it being an approximation of what I wanted. Now I don’t have to put up with that anymore. It’s tweakable at any stage. I can even record the guitar clean, then loop it back into the POD, and change the tone in the mix.

Prior to the Jesu album, my guitar tone had always been talked about as being very specific. And ironically enough, people are talking about the Jesu tone, too, but it’s via POD! People often think that you press a pre-set patch (on the POD) and everybody sounds the same. And a lot of people that I’ve talked to – even musicians that I’ve worked with – as soon as I mention that I’m using a POD and recording DI, they go, “oh, my God....” Do you know what I mean? Like, it’s horrific. Like, “what the fuck are you doing?” And then they listen to it, and they’re like, “shit, that sounds like it’s coming out of the amp.” And I’m like, “yeah, [the POD] is not just a bank.”

I don’t consider myself a straight-up guitarist, anyway. I’m not a slave to the guitar, like some people who are all about the guitar and the pickup. For me, it’s more about what I can do with it on a computer. It’s about how to shape it and get something new out of it. It’s the end result and the big picture. Everything I record has been cut up anyway and put into this and that plug in, and put through an outboard piece, and back in again. It’s software and computers that’s allowing me to do this, rather than finding the next good mic or fantastic mic placement.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:48 pm
by popvulture
Haha I was thinking as I was typing that there are surely some good uses for that thing if you were to get creative... Broadrick's a fucking great example.

It'd probably be pretty liberal to give the pod a 5% cool usage rate :D

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:50 pm
by D.o.S.
Alternatively: anything sounds good with an Avalon.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 1:30 am
by lordgalvar
Chaos UK used a POD when I saw them in (I think) 2001 for one of the loudest, most abrasive guitar sounds I've ever heard. It was going into a Marshall full stack in a tunnel (the venue was a tunnel). The pod had its own mic stand thing. My ears rang for days.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:00 am
by rustywire
Yeah I have nothing against PODs as being another supplemental tool to have at one's disposal.
I'm still surprised anytime it's recommended as the cornerstone of a setup. This case in particular; immediately after the fella says,
"With guitar I can never get it just right...for it to sound like a real um...kind of emotion that comes through"
That's what made it WTF and not necessarily bad :idk:
Agreed they do tend to sound canned, but not so much in a capable creator's hands (a Marshall stack in a tunnel helps).
I would have sooner expected [Parsons] to recommend a Sansamp and small combo amp which the fella could mic or go direct into the Duet or workstation. Something where he could have an intimate little setup; it's hard to beat an amp in a room. Most of that 5k budget went to the Motif & MBP/iface. Obvious suggestions for this fella. But unless there's some unmentioned package deal, I'm most perplexed how he could recommend the monitors-upgrade without sound treatment for that room :whoa:

This video raises more questions than it answers, for me anyway. AP has been in some of the best rooms on the planet and has probably forgotten more about music than...blah blah we get it rustyweird :whateva:

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:47 am
by D.o.S.
I mean his major cultural contribution is going to be soundtracking the mid 90's Chicago Bulls anyway.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 3:06 pm
by friendship
I don't think those are questionable recommendations at all. They could blow the entire budget treating that room and he would still not have any monitors to make good use of the new space. I guess you could spend only a small portion of the budget on room treatment, but I don't know how much half-assing it is really going to help. I don't know what kind of music he's making but he mentioned using a lot of virtual instruments, so while he says he plays guitar I'm guessing it's not his focus. A POD HD gives you a great supply for amps and effects for not a lot of money. Buying a single amp for a guy who seems to be more full production-oriented significantly limits what tones he can get (mic pos variations notwithstanding) and when/how he can record those tones. It sounds like the POD isn't going to the cornerstone, the Motif is. He's getting a great production keyboard, a fast computer that won't be burdened by as many plugins because of that keyboard, decent speakers, a good interface. An an ideal world he'd have a treated room, 3-4 real amps, and a couple mics better than those MXL cheapies, but with a budget you have to decide what your priorities are. It looks like he's doing a lot of stuff ITB already, so Alan Parsons is trying to spend the money in a way that play to the kid's strengths by improving his most powerful tools: his keyboard and his computer.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:35 pm
by rustywire
friendshizzle I feel like you're arguing against me while in fact we mostly agree. I didn't mean to suggest the pod was the cornerstone of a dubious studio, only the dubious cornerstone of a guitar rig. Also The only questionable recommendation was the lack of a recommendation: for room treatment. You can do a lot of improvement for 2-$300. Bass traps for corners & rockwool panels on the first reflection points.
I said the motif/krk & mbp/duet were all good/great recommendations. Only the pod seems to be out of place. I get your point but I still believe it to be a less than optimal solution based on [Fazel's] statement about being unsatisfied with guitar. I interpreted it as "I'd love to do more with guitar if I better liked the results I was getting" as opposed to him being OK with guitar being back burner.

Yes this fella may work mostly ITB, but the fact AP recommended monitors as the first thing to upgrade kind of speaks volumes. What good is getting all the other gear if you're working blind & cant hear what you're doing? The room treatment is a crucial component of that essential aspect: listening. AP of all people knows this, you can bet on it. Which made the POD recommendation all the more confusing as if he had stopped listening for a moment there.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:58 pm
by SoaringTortoise
I sold my POD because it was a POS.

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:01 pm
by rustywire
10/10

Re: TRUST YOUR EAR (the most valuable musical tool & guide)

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:10 pm
by friendship
rustywire wrote:friendshizzle I feel like you're arguing against me while in fact we mostly agree. I didn't mean to suggest the pod was the cornerstone of a dubious studio, only the dubious cornerstone of a guitar rig. Also The only questionable recommendation was the lack of a recommendation: for room treatment. You can do a lot of improvement for 2-$300. Bass traps for corners & rockwool panels on the first reflection points.
I said the motif/krk & mbp/duet were all good/great recommendations. Only the pod seems to be out of place. I get your point but I still believe it to be a less than optimal solution based on [Fazel's] statement about being unsatisfied with guitar. I interpreted it as "I'd love to do more with guitar if I better liked the results I was getting" as opposed to him being OK with guitar being back burner.

Yes this fella may work mostly ITB, but the fact AP recommended monitors as the first thing to upgrade kind of speaks volumes. What good is getting all the other gear if you're working blind & cant hear what you're doing? The room treatment is a crucial component of that essential aspect: listening. AP of all people knows this, you can bet on it. Which made the POD recommendation all the more confusing as if he had stopped listening for a moment there.
I agree that we agree. :) I just wanted to share my perspective that a POD is a powerful tool for the home recordist. I'm biased because mine has saved my ass so many times. Living in a thin-walled apartment does not make for convenient recording of real amps.

I wish the interview were longer, it would be neat to know what the winner was after and how Parsons came to his recommendations. You can DIY some pretty decent panels/diffusors/whatnot (or at least, I've seen great success in doing this), hopefully he told the dude how to build his own stuff to free up the ca$$$h on sorely-needed hardware.