Page 1 of 3
Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:52 pm
by behndy
sooooooo.... watching Hanna now (love it), and i know Saoirse Ronan was in Byzantium as well (LOVE IT), but she's.... kinda pure awesome. she should do more stuff.
who else is be like that?
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:18 pm
by pelliott
Bill Murray should do more non-cartoon cat movies
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:20 pm
by D.o.S.
James Deen
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:42 pm
by Achtane
D.o.S. wrote:James Deen
Chyna's terrifying clitoris
Hey, that could be a band name.
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:49 pm
by behndy
oog. that thing made me feel a tad emasculated. and it told me to DO THINGS.
heh. James Deen WAS in that crappy Hollywood Movies Take THAT movie. he was a'ight. shitty script/lines though.
urrrrrrrm the grrL that played Butch Bruce Willis's ridiculously hawt pot-belly desiring grrL in Pulp Fiction? she's only done one or two other movies. and i adooooooreeeee her.
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:19 am
by 01010111
Why isn't Nicholas Cage in more movies?
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:24 am
by Rob Fossil
Travis Fimmel, that guy is killing it as Ragnar Lothbrok on Vikings. Also, the guy who plays Floki, the answer to awesomeness is always "More Floki"
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:40 pm
by Iommic Pope
Rob Fossil wrote:Travis Fimmel, that guy is killing it as Ragnar Lothbrok on Vikings. Also, the guy who plays Floki, the answer to awesomeness is always "More Floki"
Ragnar is my man rush right now, that first episode in the second season, when his family leave him....I got a bit teary.
I really like brother athelstan on that show, too (George Blagden).
Travis Fimmel is touted to play some big roles coming up soon, I do believe.
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:53 pm
by behndy
i havna watched Vikings. 'm way behind on tv stuff. loved Dexter till the last season, really digging GoT, enjoyed the silliness of True Blood for a hinute.... but i haven't watched anything else in a while now.
i suck.
but that sounds INTRIGUING.
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:02 pm
by Mudfuzz
wfs1234 wrote:Why isn't Nicholas Cage in more movies?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbe8OhCYMys[/youtube]
granted… I in no way blame Nicholas Cage for why it sucks...
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:50 pm
by AxAxSxS
what happened to him? Wild at heart, Raising arizona, aaaaaannnnnnnnd a whole bunch of suck.
Now John cusack has been in some good ones over the years.
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:42 pm
by Mudfuzz
AxAxSxS wrote:what happened to him? Wild at heart, Raising arizona, aaaaaannnnnnnnd a whole bunch of suck.
my guess is tax dept… dude owns da man a ton O' bling, gott'a do den cheese flix to pay da man
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:58 pm
by Deltaphoenix
PeeWee Herman, where is the new movie that I heard about several years ago?
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 8:13 am
by spacelordmother
People still watch movies?
Muddy -- when did you get so street??
Re: Acting Humans that should be in more movies
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:03 pm
by Jero
AxAxSxS wrote:Now John cusack has been in some good ones over the years.
I dig some John C