Cassette 4-Tracks & "Gimmickery"
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:33 pm
Hi everyone.
I know some of you here are home-recording dorks, and many of you have mentioned 4-track cassette recording in the past.
Welp, my band The Boys Themselves is a fuzz pop power trio, and we've been working on our record on my Boss BR-1600 digital 16-track (which really only gets you 12 stand-alone tracks). It's sounding good so far.
But I had this dream the other night in which I did the whole thing on my TASCAM 424 mkII, and (in my dream) I was very pleased with it. So like all day yesterday I was all "Hmmmm WHAT IF I REALLY DID THAT." Not that I haven't considered it before, but I ultimately decided that it wasn't what I wanted to do (plus I like stereo panning guitar tracks... RAT on left, MUFF on right).
Since I was 13 or 14 (1994-95... I'm 31 now) I've always been super-enamoured with 4-tracks, specifically TASCAMs. I don't have the know-how to do any reel-to-reel stuff, so let's not get into that. But I've always wanted to do a whole record on a 4-track. Now, obviously, seems like the perfect time, as I have a power trio that plays straight up fuzz pop. And I love the idea of TBT being a "4-track exclusive band" that does all its recordings on a 4-track because, really, the songs are THAT fucking good and don't need any extra shit.
HOWEVER... that same idea of being a "4-track exclusive band" also sounds REALLY gimmicky to me. It sounds very ideological, and it also sounds like a gimmick. I know my brain is a pulsing, writhing contradiction most of the time, but I also feel like doing something like I'm describing would be unnecessarily limiting. I'm all for limits and boundaries in recording, and music in general, as that breeds creativity. I know Logic and Macbooks inside out, but I gave it up because it's boring. I have a lot of fun recording on my BOSS 16-track, and I cut my teeth on a 4-track. I also like to combine the two, as does my bandmate who writes all the music for our other band Starling Electric (he is an absolute WIZARD at basement recording without even knowing it... he's just got it, you know?).
And yes, one should do what is FUN with music. And the most rewarding. But one also should not frustrate oneself. "Limits" are good for recording... "rules" are not.
I must remember that idea for music in general... Limits are good for music... rules are not.
The question being:
Can "serious" 4-track cassette recordings still exist in the modern musical climate without being a gimmick?
I'm sure the answer can be quite simple for some... I, however, INSIST on making things way too complicated.
Thank you for your time!
C
I know some of you here are home-recording dorks, and many of you have mentioned 4-track cassette recording in the past.
Welp, my band The Boys Themselves is a fuzz pop power trio, and we've been working on our record on my Boss BR-1600 digital 16-track (which really only gets you 12 stand-alone tracks). It's sounding good so far.
But I had this dream the other night in which I did the whole thing on my TASCAM 424 mkII, and (in my dream) I was very pleased with it. So like all day yesterday I was all "Hmmmm WHAT IF I REALLY DID THAT." Not that I haven't considered it before, but I ultimately decided that it wasn't what I wanted to do (plus I like stereo panning guitar tracks... RAT on left, MUFF on right).
Since I was 13 or 14 (1994-95... I'm 31 now) I've always been super-enamoured with 4-tracks, specifically TASCAMs. I don't have the know-how to do any reel-to-reel stuff, so let's not get into that. But I've always wanted to do a whole record on a 4-track. Now, obviously, seems like the perfect time, as I have a power trio that plays straight up fuzz pop. And I love the idea of TBT being a "4-track exclusive band" that does all its recordings on a 4-track because, really, the songs are THAT fucking good and don't need any extra shit.
HOWEVER... that same idea of being a "4-track exclusive band" also sounds REALLY gimmicky to me. It sounds very ideological, and it also sounds like a gimmick. I know my brain is a pulsing, writhing contradiction most of the time, but I also feel like doing something like I'm describing would be unnecessarily limiting. I'm all for limits and boundaries in recording, and music in general, as that breeds creativity. I know Logic and Macbooks inside out, but I gave it up because it's boring. I have a lot of fun recording on my BOSS 16-track, and I cut my teeth on a 4-track. I also like to combine the two, as does my bandmate who writes all the music for our other band Starling Electric (he is an absolute WIZARD at basement recording without even knowing it... he's just got it, you know?).
And yes, one should do what is FUN with music. And the most rewarding. But one also should not frustrate oneself. "Limits" are good for recording... "rules" are not.
I must remember that idea for music in general... Limits are good for music... rules are not.
The question being:
Can "serious" 4-track cassette recordings still exist in the modern musical climate without being a gimmick?
I'm sure the answer can be quite simple for some... I, however, INSIST on making things way too complicated.
Thank you for your time!
C

