Re: The what ever thread...
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:41 pm

That's awesome / good luck!

Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I wouldn't post this shit on the internet.jfrey wrote:Not quite. It's by project. So any contracted time I'll essentially be getting paid twice for. But that won't be constant. The trick is to keep feeding him ideas from this end, that he thinks we're too busy to do ourselves.spacelordmother wrote:Holyshit. So basically you just doubled your salary?jfrey wrote:My boss doesn't really understand how much or how little time my work takes. So he was going to hire outside the company. I convinced him to go with someone I know.D.o.S. wrote:jfrey wrote:I have managed to arrange it such that the company I work for is contracting me to do my own work through an intermediary without them knowing it's me they're contracting.![]()
Would they not have given you the responsibility otherwise?
The worst that could happen is I'd get fired. I seriously consider quitting several times a week, so I'm not super worried.kbithecrowing wrote:Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I wouldn't post this shit on the internet.
Especially since you've posted pictures of your face with this account.
Thanks, Ill check them out.backwardsvoyager wrote:Mono

Not really comparable because this dude isn't using my photo for profit, but that's what resulted in this:weed_killer wrote:so apparently there's a Romanian electronics website that's using a picture of my gear, taken by me, to help display their guitar amps:

yeah, it's an early one, 76 or thereabouts. I have absolutely no idea why they would be using my picture. The amp isn't even in the foreground!wfs1234 wrote:That's weird. Isn't that a jazz chorus? Why would they use your picture?
I guess I'll have to...I just never expected anyone would bother using it.Chankgeez wrote: Not really comparable because this dude isn't using my photo for profit, but that's what resulted in this
You gotta photobomb your gear pics with name tags.