Page 55 of 740
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:42 pm
by Deltaphoenix
You need modulation. The Clouds sucks if it doesn't have a couple of modulation sources.
The Disting could do some modulation but I would look for something that could do at least 2 functions at once. Also, a Wogglebug or some random would be good for a little character on some of the modulation.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:49 pm
by D.o.S.
Care to walk me through this one because I'm still in a default mode of thinking too linearly for this format (I think). So you're talking about modulation to the Clouds itself, rather than to the signal prior to it hitting the Clouds, right?
Totally open to suggestions here, b/c there are definitely facets to this that I'm not giving enough attention to.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:52 pm
by Inconuucl
D.o.S. wrote:Care to walk me through this one because I'm still in a default mode of thinking too linearly for this format (I think). So you're talking about modulation to the Clouds itself, rather than to the signal prior to it hitting the Clouds, right?
Totally open to suggestions here, b/c there are definitely facets to this that I'm not giving enough attention to.
Yeah, like LFOs or function generators. Maths would be an obvious solution, but you're already out of space there.

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:52 pm
by Strange Tales
Yea, just get some LFOs, like the Xaoc Quad LFO I don't remember the name of. Anything to modulate the various parameters on the Clouds.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:00 pm
by D.o.S.
Inconuucl wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Care to walk me through this one because I'm still in a default mode of thinking too linearly for this format (I think). So you're talking about modulation to the Clouds itself, rather than to the signal prior to it hitting the Clouds, right?
Totally open to suggestions here, b/c there are definitely facets to this that I'm not giving enough attention to.
Yeah, like LFOs or function generators. Maths would be an obvious solution, but you're already out of space there.

It's like pedalboard planning all over again. Ew, I'm turning into Goroth.
So it looks like pulling out the panels and ditching the sequencer would give me enough space for the Xaoc. I really hate to monopolize this thread with these questions, but assuming that's the case, this should be something to work towards? Until the inevitable dissatisfaction kicks in and I'm swapping things out, ofc.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:05 pm
by Inconuucl
D.o.S. wrote:Inconuucl wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Care to walk me through this one because I'm still in a default mode of thinking too linearly for this format (I think). So you're talking about modulation to the Clouds itself, rather than to the signal prior to it hitting the Clouds, right?
Totally open to suggestions here, b/c there are definitely facets to this that I'm not giving enough attention to.
Yeah, like LFOs or function generators. Maths would be an obvious solution, but you're already out of space there.

It's like pedalboard planning all over again. Ew, I'm turning into Goroth.
So it looks like pulling out the panels and ditching the sequencer would give me enough space for the Xaoc. I really hate to monopolize this thread with these questions, but assuming that's the case, this should be something to work towards? Until the inevitable dissatisfaction kicks in and I'm swapping things out, ofc.
I mean, I feel like that joystick is a waste of space that's better done with an outside controller. But you do you man, the module b/s/t community is as active as the pedal one, for better or for worst.

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:11 pm
by Inconuucl
Here's what I have in mind right now, was going to splurge on an elements, but then I I thought to start with the rings which is smaller while still achieving that glitchy weird alien acoustic sound I want. Then I can get the Elements and either keep both or sell the rings.

Brainseed is there to sample CV from the maths output to build sequences with, it's a really cool module. I added the MuScale to make it actually stick to a scale, which is obvious.

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:13 pm
by D.o.S.
Oooh. Fancy.
Inconuucl wrote:
I mean, I feel like that joystick is a waste of space that's better done with an outside controller. But you do you man, the module b/s/t community is as active as the pedal one, for better or for worst.

Well that's the bitch of it, right, I'm not married to any of it (save the Grendel) at this point, and 86'ing the joystick gives me enough space for the Maths (which is hot shit), but I can't seem to find an appropriate replacement as far as outside controllers go. Suggestions, as always, are welcome.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:15 pm
by Inconuucl
D.o.S. wrote:Oooh. Fancy.
Inconuucl wrote:
I mean, I feel like that joystick is a waste of space that's better done with an outside controller. But you do you man, the module b/s/t community is as active as the pedal one, for better or for worst.

Well that's the bitch of it, right, I'm not married to any of it (save the Grendel) at this point, and 86'ing the joystick gives me enough space for the Maths (which is hot shit), but I can't seem to find an appropriate replacement as far as outside controllers go. Suggestions, as always, are welcome.
You know, a standalone CV joystick shouldn't be hard to build, right? Isn't the joystick just two potentiometers? Maybe ask around in the DIY parts of both here and Muffwiggler.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:34 pm
by D.o.S.
If I wasn't totally useless when it comes to DIY, sure.
With deeper pockets I'd swing for this beast
http://analogcraftsman.com/?product=arc ... escription
Also stackable cables whaaaaaaat. That shit is rad.
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:23 pm
by MrNovember
@D.o.S. these are all just suggestions, but personally I would drop the mixer, the Pittsburgh Dual Index, and the blanks and I would add the following:
- Pittsburgh LFO2: small, compact dual LFO. I feel like you're planning on doing more wiggling with your hands so I don't think you really need a complex modulation source like the Batumi or Maths (yet). Plus you'll also be able to use the Sewastopol as an envelope follower for another mod source
- Intellijel uVCA II: I don't mean to keep mentioning this one, it's just smaller than the Pittsburgh one and allowed me to fit more things in
- Malekko Mix 4: probably all the mixing you'd need in a tiny package
- Malekko Noise: a really nice noise source (pairs well with Rings) in a tiny package. Also fills up the annoying 3hp gap left by the Mix 4; I'm OCD like that
Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:30 pm
by D.o.S.
Hey now everyone I was planning on PMing has responded -- and I haven't had to clear out my inbox to do it. Thanks for bearing with my hijack, all.

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:46 pm
by resincum
not a hijack at all.. I'm learning tons watching you go through this. over here planning like..
modular is ENDLESS

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:56 pm
by Inconuucl
resincum wrote:not a hijack at all.. I'm learning tons watching you go through this. over here planning like..
modular is ENDLESS

Yup! Same here, If you see some of the builds I had earlier in this thread...
I just need to get my board stable enough to start buying modular stuff.

Re: Can we talk about modular synths?
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:39 pm
by Forrrest
guyz
i'm so torn as to what to do with the last 22hp of my 6U
should I just get another row... or two.. :shame: