Re: The relatively early NAMM 2017 thread
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:08 pm
Oh gat dawmn that black st. vincent. I realllly don't need to get any more guitars, but....
I mean, I love fuzz (tm). But it's true, it's not an innovative ground for pedals.whoismarykelly wrote:Fuzz is boring as fuck. There I said it.
It's true that most of the innovation around fuzz lies within design / features and not really actual sound. Though I think INFANEMs are unimpeachable in terms of soundInconuucl wrote:I mean, I love fuzz (tm). But it's true, it's not an innovative ground for pedals.whoismarykelly wrote:Fuzz is boring as fuck. There I said it.Anything "new" that I've seen in the realm of fuzz lately just sounds the same or worse than what came before.
I agree with this like 99.9%, but uhhhh, the Pretty YearsInconuucl wrote:I mean, I love fuzz (tm). But it's true, it's not an innovative ground for pedals.whoismarykelly wrote:Fuzz is boring as fuck. There I said it.Anything "new" that I've seen in the realm of fuzz lately just sounds the same or worse than what came before.



Pretty Years is based on the WASP filter design, I'd be hard pressed to call that a fuzz first and foremost. I think it does have some sort of OD/Fuzz design since it has mutliple gain stages as well, but the WASP filter is super well known for being able to distort well.baremountain wrote:I agree with this like 99.9%, but uhhhh, the Pretty YearsInconuucl wrote:I mean, I love fuzz (tm). But it's true, it's not an innovative ground for pedals.whoismarykelly wrote:Fuzz is boring as fuck. There I said it.Anything "new" that I've seen in the realm of fuzz lately just sounds the same or worse than what came before.
![]()
I mean, that's not just a fuzz of course, and that's what makes it so versatile. But with CBA the ability to ramp fuzz parameters in real time without interacting with the knobs at all is a pretty nice innovation, wouldn't you say? It's not like they'd forget their dipswitches if they are releasing a fuzz. I would like to see something else, but I wouldn't complain about having a fuzz that could automatically raise & lower its gain/bias/EQ. Maybe that's just me though
The idea is cool but what you would end up with is either a tremolo or a modulated wah or a phaser or whatever that just always has dirt on it. Its less cool and more gimmicky in practice. See the Cusack Tap-a-scream.baremountain wrote:I agree with this like 99.9%, but uhhhh, the Pretty YearsInconuucl wrote:I mean, I love fuzz (tm). But it's true, it's not an innovative ground for pedals.whoismarykelly wrote:Fuzz is boring as fuck. There I said it.Anything "new" that I've seen in the realm of fuzz lately just sounds the same or worse than what came before.
![]()
I mean, that's not just a fuzz of course, and that's what makes it so versatile. But with CBA the ability to ramp fuzz parameters in real time without interacting with the knobs at all is a pretty nice innovation, wouldn't you say? It's not like they'd forget their dipswitches if they are releasing a fuzz. I would like to see something else, but I wouldn't complain about having a fuzz that could automatically raise & lower its gain/bias/EQ. Maybe that's just me though
I thought it was inspired by the Thermionic Culture Vuture?Strange Tales wrote: Pretty Years is based on the WASP filter design, I'd be hard pressed to call that a fuzz first and foremost. I think it does have some sort of OD/Fuzz design since it has mutliple gain stages as well, but the WASP filter is super well known for being able to distort well.
Chase Bliss Klone, called it.echorec wrote: