Re: Let's see your GUITAR!
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 12:39 am
That's awesome looking! I love it
Oh alright. I was gonna use just regular strat saddles for the three low strings + maybe saddles like that for the high strings. Not sure if it'll be worth the hassle or not, cus I love what the tele does for my sound, and I love the cool sound like Matt Pike has with his first act, but not sure if I should go thru the trouble or not...skullservant wrote:I wouldn't recommend EVER making a Telecaster with more than 6 strings if you plan on using a traditional bridge. Any other type of guitar or bridge style? Completely go for it! But using this standard style of bridge has been nothing but a pain.
Every other set of strings E/A/D/B/E are all intonating just fine, it's just the G's. I'm going to spend some more time with it tonight, or maybe put a larger size G on the guitar, cause these G's are either 8 + 10 or 10 +10 which just is a little on the thin side. I might also take a look at the nut
I'm gonna recommend you go all Big Joe Williams and double the B and D strings.skullservant wrote: I've also been toying around with the idea of adding octave strings to the G and B strings now too.

Yeah, I'm pretty much stuck with this bridge plate if I do this. Mainly because of Rondo having the string thru holes in a stupid lay out + me being too lazy to feel like drilling thru for a different bridge. So if I do that then I'll be using just three saddles like that + drilling new holes so I can put them on. Headstock would be perfect for this too since I can just trim one side of it down, drill for tuners and still look alright. Might go thru with that after I'm done with the wiring shit that I'm gonna be doing over the next week or two.skullservant wrote:It'd be worth a shot, and might work out a little bit better that way. Honestly the only problems I've had is the low E octave being too close to the edge of the neck (which, if you didn't have an octave on it, wouldn't be a problem), and those G strings which have seemed to mellow out. If you used a stock Telecaster bridge, you'd just have to drill holes for the top loading strings to go through in addition to getting those 12 string saddles
Made me think of this for some reason:Chankgeez wrote:I'm gonna recommend you go all Big Joe Williams and double the B and D strings.skullservant wrote: I've also been toying around with the idea of adding octave strings to the G and B strings now too.


skullservant wrote:Just finished putting this together today. You can read about it here if you're curious:
viewtopic.php?f=192&t=41195

That junk is so dope! Also, you have no idea how happy that gif made me, Sparrow.Sparrow wrote:skullservant wrote:Just finished putting this together today. You can read about it here if you're curious:
viewtopic.php?f=192&t=41195
how cool is that!?!
Yeah that would work duder. That would be easiest, it seems. I wonder if there is a place to source the saddles without having the shell out the money for the bridge too?Swordfishtrombone wrote:Yeah, I'm pretty much stuck with this bridge plate if I do this. Mainly because of Rondo having the string thru holes in a stupid lay out + me being too lazy to feel like drilling thru for a different bridge. So if I do that then I'll be using just three saddles like that + drilling new holes so I can put them on. Headstock would be perfect for this too since I can just trim one side of it down, drill for tuners and still look alright. Might go thru with that after I'm done with the wiring shit that I'm gonna be doing over the next week or two.
Isn't that Thurston Moore's from Albini? So many strings.Swordfishtrombone wrote: Made me think of this for some reason:
Killer! I think you're convincing me more and more to go ahead with two more strings.Chankgeez wrote:That's awesome.
I love these too:
Sparrow wrote:
how cool is that!?!
Thank you both! Still trying to get used to the amount of tension with 12 strings. It's so fun and challenging though, and the soundfoomanfat wrote:That junk is so dope! Also, you have no idea how happy that gif made me, Sparrow.
Yeah, I'm keeping my eye out for individual saddles now. I'll buy whole bridge if it comes down to it, but saving money is always nice.skullservant wrote:Yeah that would work duder. That would be easiest, it seems. I wonder if there is a place to source the saddles without having the shell out the money for the bridge too?Swordfishtrombone wrote:Yeah, I'm pretty much stuck with this bridge plate if I do this. Mainly because of Rondo having the string thru holes in a stupid lay out + me being too lazy to feel like drilling thru for a different bridge. So if I do that then I'll be using just three saddles like that + drilling new holes so I can put them on. Headstock would be perfect for this too since I can just trim one side of it down, drill for tuners and still look alright. Might go thru with that after I'm done with the wiring shit that I'm gonna be doing over the next week or two.
Isn't that Thurston Moore's from Albini? So many strings.Swordfishtrombone wrote: Made me think of this for some reason: