That Cult of Luna cover almost sounds exactly how the original sounds aside from the vocals. Though there are some playing mistakes. But it's honestly not slower or louder or even heavier, the original sounds far meaner.
Re: Slower + Louder = Doomier?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:14 pm
by HeavyXIII
ShaolinLambKiller wrote:That Cult of Luna cover almost sounds exactly how the original sounds aside from the vocals. Though there are some playing mistakes. But it's honestly not slower or louder or even heavier, the original sounds far meaner.
Eh, opinions will differ. It certainly ISN'T slower. I think CoL vocals fit a little better, although they didn't do much to make the song their own. PS: I'm also not a Corgan hater by any stretch of the imagination.
Re: Slower + Louder = Doomier?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:36 pm
by ShaolinLambKiller
god no, they sound way out of place. But yea nothing done to really make it different from the original aside from making it worse.
I'm a huge fan of both Smashing Pumpkins and Cult of Luna. So it's not a preference of one over the other. It's just not done nearly as good or impactful.