Re: Let's see your GUITAR!
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:06 pm
I neeeeed a 12 string, saw a guy play one last night and it sounded so big!


I never tune 12 strings to standard, always at least a step down. I hope everyone else is doing the same.skullservant wrote:I meant to ask- how do your guitars hold up with 12 strings on them? I always get nervous about string tension for whatever reason and was just curious if you've ever had an issue
skullservant wrote:I meant to ask- how do your guitars hold up with 12 strings on them? I always get nervous about string tension for whatever reason and was just curious if you've ever had an issue
with locking tuners on there it does great. We do about 40 minutes to an hour for our set and I rarely pause to tune. I also lube the brass nuts and the bridge saddles with graphite. Makes them really slick. the drone strings are VERY stable. I notice the ones that anchor down in the trem block need more attention. Intonation I do by getting the lower note string dead on, and then adjust the octave. you might find one or two octave string end up being "good enough as you can run out of adjustment room. they get pretty damn close though and the other four should be perfect. Problems you might have would be if the nut is not cut to fit your strings and binds. You would also want to make the string cavity longer than normal to accommodate the extra tension.samzadgan wrote:Taking skully's question one step further how does that fender style trem hold tuning on a 12 string?
I may be dead wrong on this, but...aren't the wizard necks all 3/5 piece now? I thought the additional layers with opposing grains were supposed to strengthen while still remaining malleable, but resistant to warping?AxAxSxS wrote:
Nicely. I have had no problems with any of them. I would not want to make one with a wizard neck profile, and a quality truss rod is a good idea, but I've had no issues long term with any of them. I would imagine that my playing style adds some magor stress to them. so far I have only had to replace a couple of worn octave saddles.
I had an Iceman with a Wizard 5 neck...one of the most regrettable things i did was sell that guitar...even worse was why i sold it and what i was buying in its place...a fucking Epi Zakk Wylde sig model...stupid stupid stupid!!!Iommic Pope wrote:I may be dead wrong on this, but...aren't the wizard necks all 3/5 piece now? I thought the additional layers with opposing grains were supposed to strengthen while still remaining malleable, but resistant to warping?AxAxSxS wrote:
Nicely. I have had no problems with any of them. I would not want to make one with a wizard neck profile, and a quality truss rod is a good idea, but I've had no issues long term with any of them. I would imagine that my playing style adds some magor stress to them. so far I have only had to replace a couple of worn octave saddles.
Again, school me if I'm wrong...I shoulda looked this up before I posted....I'll do it in a sec.
I just like a good convo about Ibanez necks. Cause they're the best. Deal with that shit, haters.
Also, Skip, that tele is fucking evil.
I love it.
How do you find that Duncan?
Edit: More recent wizards are 5, older ones (super-wizards) are 3.
I was kinda right.
That turned out great!!!!!funsize wrote:finished a tele build with a body I bought from Colossus in the the B/S/T. Nothing fancy, but I've wanted a standard tele for a long time.
Why thank you sir!!! I love the Hot Rails, its got just enough output to be super crunchy, sting clarity is balanced, it has a TON of mids, and it sounds amazing both clean and especially dirty.Iommic Pope wrote:Also, Skip, that tele is fucking evil.
I love it.
How do you find that Duncan?

I was thinking more about the uber thin carve on those I don't really get to into Ibanez. I will say that I have played some nice ones, just they never appealed to me.Iommic Pope wrote:I may be dead wrong on this, but...aren't the wizard necks all 3/5 piece now? I thought the additional layers with opposing grains were supposed to strengthen while still remaining malleable, but resistant to warping?AxAxSxS wrote:
Nicely. I have had no problems with any of them. I would not want to make one with a wizard neck profile, and a quality truss rod is a good idea, but I've had no issues long term with any of them. I would imagine that my playing style adds some magor stress to them. so far I have only had to replace a couple of worn octave saddles.
Again, school me if I'm wrong...I shoulda looked this up before I posted....I'll do it in a sec.
I just like a good convo about Ibanez necks. Cause they're the best. Deal with that shit, haters.
Also, Skip, that tele is fucking evil.
I love it.
How do you find that Duncan?
Edit: More recent wizards are 5, older ones (super-wizards) are 3.
I was kinda right.
Classic and awesome.funsize wrote:finished a tele build with a body I bought from Colossus in the the B/S/T. Nothing fancy, but I've wanted a standard tele for a long time.
Oh they will def do good cleans, especially in the mid and neck position. And I think your on the right path with a DD in the bridge, it should pair nicely.Iommic Pope wrote:Awesome, cheers Skip!
Yeah I've been considering them for the neck position in my strat (which will happen one day), but I wasn't sure as I wanted something guaranteed to do sweet cleans. But you and Skully are vouching for em, so they're definitely short listed now.
Was gonna pair with a Duncan distortion in the bridge.
This shit you guys have got going on here totally gets me hard for some Tele action though.
You both need to demo these for a rail shootout!