Page 33 of 44

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:25 pm
by tremolo3
I don't know who Ryan Adams is but Morrisey can suck my fat mexican dick.

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:26 pm
by coldbrightsunlight
tremolo3 wrote:I don't know who Ryan Adams is but Morrisey can suck my fat mexican dick.
Excuse me but do you have a moment to talk about Mexrissey?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zh-89Hg2K0[/youtube]

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:27 pm
by baremountain
yeatsvisitslincoln wrote:Same re: Happiness. The main difference is the envelope and the patch bay having Env- and Env+ out. Lots of fun for other applications like auto-flange on a CBA Spectre.
Wait, so you can turn your playing into an envelope CV out? If so you just sold me 100% ok a dang Protostar. :drool:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:41 pm
by yeatsvisitslincoln
baremountain wrote: Wait, so you can turn your playing into an envelope CV out? If so you just sold me 100% ok a dang Protostar. :drool:
With all apologies to your wallet, yes that is what I'm saying. :joy:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:52 pm
by actual
popvulture wrote:In a nutshell, pretty much all of their offerings are clones, and they're connected to a fundamentalist Christian church that donates to/promotes a lot of horrible causes. General shittiness.
baremountain wrote: I mean, firstly they blatantly steal other people's circuits and sell them as their own - they've got maybe a couple original pedals out of the several dozen they've produced. I think we can all agree that's pretty lame?
Secondly they've got serious ties to religious orgs that actively donate to anti-LGBTQ orgs, and that's an inexcusable cause to rally behind IMO. If there's one thing I've come to realize it's that your dollar goes a lot further than your vote when politics get involved. I don't want a dime of my money going towards those causes when I can buy pedals from someone like Brian who donates to the ACLU or Ben & Louise who, last I checked, were trying to get a new workshop where they could partner with a soup kitchen & feed the local homeless. I guess that boils down to personal politics, but regardless of that, I think actively helping a community of people is always better than funneling money to oppress people. :idk:
EDIT: Yeah PV gave the abbrev. version pretty well.
Alright, thanks. Sounds fairly shitty, I agree.

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:21 pm
by Pete
hotknife wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJx90qlJhfo[/youtube]

I :love: Devin.

Same here! I'm surprised the Ocean Machine pedal isn't getting any attention here. Seems really cool!

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:51 pm
by Pete
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELZZ6Chy0x4


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldB4j5Enymo


It's always cracked me up how Andy has fun with Earthquaker's "made in (insert adjective here) Akron, Ohio" line. This time it's "The cold dark recesses of Akron, Ohio, where no one can hear you scream."

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:54 pm
by UglyCasanova
Pete wrote:"The cold dark recesses of Akron, Ohio, where no one can hear you scream."
Followed by a Wilhelm Scream. :lol:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:55 pm
by Pete
UglyCasanova wrote:
Pete wrote:"The cold dark recesses of Akron, Ohio, where no one can hear you scream."
Followed by a Wilhelm Scream. :lol:
Yeah, that made me laugh. :lol:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:57 pm
by aholidayatthesea
jrfox92 wrote:I hope teej re-releases the V1 Gen Loss one day.
Always thought it looked badass, and the 125B enclosure is definitely a big plus.
Every day I kick myself for not jumping on a used v1 gen loss that was in BST.

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 9:02 pm
by UglyCasanova
That small v1 Gen Loss didn't have a mix knob. It was too squishy, imo. V2 is a better pick. I had to split the signal in two with my v1 so that I could blend the unaffected signal with the squishy soup of the GL.

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 10:13 pm
by 01010111
An analog hybrid synthesizer that's fully programmeable, polyphonic, and has 5 oscillators per voice???? They claim you can actually program the circuits in it? I'm not sure what that means functionally, though?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaV-zB4-dcQ[/youtube]

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:56 pm
by jrfox92
UglyCasanova wrote:That small v1 Gen Loss didn't have a mix knob. It was too squishy, imo. V2 is a better pick. I had to split the signal in two with my v1 so that I could blend the unaffected signal with the squishy soup of the GL.
I keep mine full wet 99% of the time (at least, with my synths), anyway.

In other news, I finally saw that new Red Panda.
Timestretch = hnnnnnnnnnng :drool:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 1:30 am
by Inconuucl
I'm excited for the new DOD volume pedal. :facepalm:

Re: The NAMM 2017 thread

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 1:37 am
by comesect2.0
is there a demo yet of the new prototype pedal from red panda ? description sounded good yet confused me...