ilovefuzz.com

D.o.S. wrote:These last two pages are exhaustively incorrect at explaining X.

: The D.o.S. Story.

#LePageLessons

Invisible Man wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:These last two pages are exhaustively incorrect at explaining X.

: The D.o.S. Story.

I mean I could explain it but earnest posts tend to get ignored so it's not worth the bother.

No one is interested in rational discourse.

Look no further than this election cycle for evidence.

Even so, the image of D periodically opening the door of a heated debate and whispering 'fuck you' before jetting makes me warm and tingly.

http://www.salon.com/2017/01/15/dont-th ... ect-trump/

this is a good piece.

jrfox92 wrote:Absolute. Fucking. Bullshit.

Why? I thought most people were pretty pro commuting her sentence

snipelfritz wrote:http://www.salon.com/2017/01/15/dont-think-of-a-rampaging-elephant-linguist-george-lakoff-explains-how-the-democrats-helped-elect-trump/

this is a good piece.

That is a fucking great article.

Brandsmannen wrote:

jrfox92 wrote:Absolute. Fucking. Bullshit.

Why? I thought most people were pretty pro commuting her sentence

Most people are.

Interesting* to see what looks like a double standard on whistleblowing and leaked information here.



*Interesting meaning painfully predictable.

D.o.S. wrote:

Brandsmannen wrote:

jrfox92 wrote:Absolute. Fucking. Bullshit.

Why? I thought most people were pretty pro commuting her sentence

Most people are.

Interesting* to see what looks like a double standard on whistleblowing and leaked information here.



*Interesting meaning painfully predictable.

Like happy Russia leaked info on HRC, but Snowden and Manning are traitors kinda predictable?

Si.

It's only okay if other governments do it to serve their interests

Just a note, I like Snowden and Assange (I've never considered Snowden a traitor), but I have some problems with Chelsea Manning due to the probability she got a lot of people killed with her stupidity.

Snowden did it right, in my opinion. Manning didn't.
(Also, my opinion isn't incredibly strong where Manning is concerned, the biggest issue I have is Obama using this as an opportunity to get in the news again)

So Snowden, the guy who fled to Hong Kong and Russia rather than face the consequences of being caught (because the whistleblower law wouldn't apply to him as a contractor and he was capital F fucked) did it right... while Manning, who pled guilty, cooperated with the investigation, received the longest sentence of any leaker ever (despite none of the information being classified as Top Secret) and was subjected to such inhumane treatement that it was ruled by the UN as torture, did it wrong?

Are you sure it's not because she revealed that the US (shockingly!) was committing war crimes?

Also Obama had to respond, that's how formal petitions that gather more than 100,000 signatures work. The White House is obligated to respond after that threshold.