Re: BitQuest! First proto build page 11
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:44 am
Ah, I'm curious about the patches!
Please, do tell, do tell!
Please, do tell, do tell!
While trying to make a random coefficient work with anything I accidentally made a noise generator with a steep filter that makes R2D2 noises at one end of the pot, really fun sounding.. couldn't really do much else with it but I love those bleeps and bloops.goroth wrote:
What about a pink noise generator?
Or something with a crossover in it where the crossover controls two varuations of a certain parameter - eg a trem where you use the crossover to control where the signal splits between two wave shapes.
I have it set up so the expression pedal completely takes over for the pot, total disconnect. I think that way is more powerful for more patches and more users... but with a jumper wire a person could set the wiper of the pot as the end of the expression, letting your expression work from above it or below it depending. I wouldn't hard wire it like that for the public though, I think that would really depend on the user and situation.Bartimaeus wrote: A quick question about the expression - will the expression pedal take over the sweep of the know, or will it control the amount of sweep above the current position of the knob? i.e. when the knob is set at noon, will the expression pedal sweep the full two octaves or will it sweep up from noon?
The boxes were supposed to ship to Adam a couple or few weeks ago.. I don't know what the heck is going on but I just know they're gonna ship this week and he'll work his magic and get 'em to me and I don't mind working through Christmas/New Year's so as soon as it comes together we'll go for it.. if it isn't December it'll be early January for sure!Jero wrote:HLYMLY! Does that mean these will still probably be available this month?jwar wrote:Guess what's on the way to me!!!!!!!!!
:)
What I'd like to do, and I haven't accomplished it yet but I'm on the track, is to make digital noise with a random number thinger, then take that constantly changing number and sample it every so often with an lfo, so you could set how fast the random changes happen, and then use that random coefficient to drive basically any effect that's modified by a coefficient. I've been trying to get a steep 4 pole filter to open and close based on the random coeff, with not great success, but that's the kinda thing I think would be cool to do with random. I did accomplish a tremolo with a random rate but I think it's kind of a one-trick-pony as is.Tompski wrote:What are people meaning when talking about random? do you mean like a sample and hold effect like on Zappa's Ship Ahoy? now that would be cool!
Haha I love #1! That would be so weird! (Before people ask for it, it's an impossible idea meant for humour!)Forrrest wrote:patch 8 ideas:
1
how about you just make the last present a random one!?
it'll randomly chose one of the other 7 presets
and it'll randomly chose what the parameters for it are.
every time you select patch 8 you'll get a new experience!. (your quest will be to find the sound again! :) )
parameter knobs do nothing. HA.
2
random bit crush!
There's no reason why bit crushing needs to only be first (or last) bits in the digital sequence?
it can be a combination of any bit in the sequence. why not chop out the 3rd, the 8th and 11th bit if you're going to crush (cut) out 3 bits of data?
the random crushing can be a constant alternation of which bits get cut from the signal.
1st parameter choose how many bits your crushing,
2nd parameter the speed of the random changes (like a random step sequencer)
I'm super curious about your new machine! Can't wait to see it in action! I'd love to see it do some picks too.. and what it looks like with a powder coated box...jwar wrote:In a way it's a good thing they're delayed though Ryan. That way I get to test one on a fiber laser! :)
Here's the starting line-up! As of today! *wink*Tristan wrote:Ah, I'm curious about the patches!
Please, do tell, do tell! :lol:
It's a different sound for sure than post gain reverb.. I like it because when it's mixed it gives a distorted signal a really nice halo of reverb that isn't sizzly, just seems to fit on the distorted signal better in this application. The other way sounds cool too though, just has a different character to the reverb sound.. if this was an all reverb pedal I'd do each, sounds different enough I think for both to be cool.yallerhon wrote:YES to patch 8 being pre-gain reverb!
:)