ILF4LYF
http://ilovefuzz.com/
I was born on an Army base in California and have lived in California, New York, Maryland, Texas, and Tennessee.Chankgeez wrote:^Schooled by a Canadian?
I'm not quite sure you could called Clinton a true moderate but the definition of a moderate is so subjective, I guess she could be. I see her more as a Moderate Republican pretending to be a Liberal Democrat. Now she is liberal in a lot of her views, but she's also conservative on many of them. Hmmmm...maybe she is a fucking moderate. Maybe I'm high right now? Maybe?Seance wrote:I totally disagree with this assessment. Hillary Clinton is a moderate. So is Barack Obama.hbombgraphics wrote:It's not hard to look around and see the extreme polarizing positions of each candidate, they aren't running for moderates, they are gobbling up extremists, it forces everyone into an us or them mentality. Powerful people have always divided the less powerful in order to maintain power, this isn't new and it's not a conspiracy, it's history.
The 'extreme' of the Democratic party is full of Progressives who feel like the system should
work equally well for all citizens. That's hardly a polarizing position to "maintain power".
It's the Republican party that has become 'extremist' in order to disenfranchise the working
poor who they appeal to. Death Tax? Lower the capital gains tax? Unless you are super wealthy
these aren't your 'real' issues, these are 'aspirational issues'. Like the "Joe the Plumber" BS.
I had a feeling, but look where you live now.Seance wrote:I was born on an Army base in California and have lived in California, New York, Maryland, Texas, and Tennessee.Chankgeez wrote:^Schooled by a Canadian?
So I actually received all of my schoolin' in the US of A.
Everyone is the opposite of what they say they are.jwar wrote:I'm not quite sure you could called Clinton a true moderate but the definition of a moderate is so subjective, I guess she could be. I see her more as a Moderate Republican pretending to be a Liberal Democrat. Now she is liberal in a lot of her views, but she's also conservative on many of them. Hmmmm...maybe she is a fucking moderate. Maybe I'm high right now? Maybe?Seance wrote:I totally disagree with this assessment. Hillary Clinton is a moderate. So is Barack Obama.hbombgraphics wrote:It's not hard to look around and see the extreme polarizing positions of each candidate, they aren't running for moderates, they are gobbling up extremists, it forces everyone into an us or them mentality. Powerful people have always divided the less powerful in order to maintain power, this isn't new and it's not a conspiracy, it's history.
The 'extreme' of the Democratic party is full of Progressives who feel like the system should
work equally well for all citizens. That's hardly a polarizing position to "maintain power".
It's the Republican party that has become 'extremist' in order to disenfranchise the working
poor who they appeal to. Death Tax? Lower the capital gains tax? Unless you are super wealthy
these aren't your 'real' issues, these are 'aspirational issues'. Like the "Joe the Plumber" BS.
On the political spectrum I see Hillary as a Moderate. Within the Democratic party she is closer to whatjwar wrote:I'm not quite sure you could called Clinton a true moderate but the definition of a moderate is so subjective, I guess she could be. I see her more as a Moderate Republican pretending to be a Liberal Democrat. Now she is liberal in a lot of her views, but she's also conservative on many of them. Hmmmm...maybe she is a fucking moderate. Maybe I'm high right now? Maybe?Seance wrote:I totally disagree with this assessment. Hillary Clinton is a moderate. So is Barack Obama.hbombgraphics wrote:It's not hard to look around and see the extreme polarizing positions of each candidate, they aren't running for moderates, they are gobbling up extremists, it forces everyone into an us or them mentality. Powerful people have always divided the less powerful in order to maintain power, this isn't new and it's not a conspiracy, it's history.
The 'extreme' of the Democratic party is full of Progressives who feel like the system should
work equally well for all citizens. That's hardly a polarizing position to "maintain power".
It's the Republican party that has become 'extremist' in order to disenfranchise the working
poor who they appeal to. Death Tax? Lower the capital gains tax? Unless you are super wealthy
these aren't your 'real' issues, these are 'aspirational issues'. Like the "Joe the Plumber" BS.
hbombgraphics wrote:Chankgeez wrote:True.
(I can't wait until the full integration of the Internet of Fuzz. Then we'll truly be united.)
every thing is better with fuzz.
We should run the candidates through some pedals
Yeah. True.Chankgeez wrote:I had a feeling, but look where you live now.Seance wrote:I was born on an Army base in California and have lived in California, New York, Maryland, Texas, and Tennessee.Chankgeez wrote:^Schooled by a Canadian?
So I actually received all of my schoolin' in the US of A.
Unfortunately I think the current political process in the US already runs the candidates through a fuzz pedal.hbombgraphics wrote:Chankgeez wrote:True.
(I can't wait until the full integration of the Internet of Fuzz. Then we'll truly be united.)
every thing is better with fuzz.
We should run the candidates through some pedals
Well Plato elected people like himself as Philosopher King. But... he didn't like poets,Chankgeez wrote:Yeah, as I've said before, no political system is perfect, except in the view of my high school Western Civ. teacher. He thought a benevolent dictatorship'd be perfect.
I'd always say to him "Where are you gonna find a benevolent dictator?"
now I am toojwar wrote:I'm moderately hard right now.
