Page 208 of 1450

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:13 pm
by My name is Mudd
I'm...just gonna stand over there for awhile, OK? Y'all go on without me...really...

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:15 pm
by Eric!
I've had to refrain in uncertainty so many times. And it's lame.

NOPE, we got SPAGHETTI

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:44 pm
by behndy
*grabs Mudd*

NOPE! getcher ass in here Kenner. shit's gonna be AWESOME.

'SKETTI TIIIIIIMEEEE!!!

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:17 pm
by Heatmonger
Image

Do any of you gentlemen have a suitable substitute for NOSE GREASE :erm:

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:36 pm
by behndy
sweet. Buddha's. brown bits.

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:39 pm
by Achtane
I find that the blood of orphans has the ideal mix of "slippery" and "long-lasting" to cover so many types of lubricant needs...

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:29 am
by Mudfuzz
Heatmonger wrote:Image

Do any of you gentlemen have a suitable substitute for NOSE GREASE :erm:

No thanks, that would make my pick slip out of my hand even more then normal.

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:42 am
by Achtane
But..but TOAN IS IN THE FINGERZ!! You don't even NEED to hide behind effects as long as you have fingertoans!

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:52 am
by Jero
Achtane wrote:But..but TOAN IS IN THE FINGERZ!! You don't even NEED to hide behind effects as long as you have fingertoans!

Apparently it's nosetoans

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:50 am
by theavondon
bet that sounds nasally

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:53 am
by Eric!
theavondon wrote:bet that sounds nasally


Bah-dumm TSSS

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:04 am
by Mudfuzz
Achtane wrote:But..but TOAN IS IN THE FINGERZ!! You don't even NEED to hide behind effects as long as you have fingertoans!

Image

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:28 am
by D.o.S.
Lemme preface this with the simple fact that I'm loaded enough that it took me 7 tries to get from "you dun fucked up your name/password" to posting. (I even had to Captchya a bit.)

Nevermind that my evening has made a vast quantity of mildly existence-qualifying things minutes (as in little, not as in fraction of an hour), miserable, and vastly-world conqueringly inconseqential.

Nevermind the Talkbass Gospel:
Jaco only needed four. Mark Olson fucks kittens. No good players use effects. All smart people are conservative-leaning old men. And Praise and Worship is the greatest club this side of fuck-your-sister Landlocked-capital, Landlocked state.

And never mind that spellcheck is being a redline underline nazi...

behndy wrote:fucking Stryper looking corporate symbol you got there buddy. nice!

That made me giggle.

Fuck Stryper. Fuck Hair metal. Fuck fascists, and fuck the miserable luck that put a bunch of monkeys in a position to suffer existential crisis after existential crisis.

Image

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:35 am
by Derelict78
This thread is an oasis from spaceritual
BLAAAA BLLLAAAAA BBBBBBLA

Re: Bitch about TalkBass here. Post Boobs while you are at i

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:02 am
by behndy
i am so falling deeper and deeper in love with D.O.seyD.oh.

and GAWD i hope the fact that Mark Olson Fucks Kttens DOES become one of the oft-repeated, justify their small-mindedness gospel Over There.

if it weren't for efx, i'd stay the fuck out of there. asked a simple question about volume loss going from one signal into 4x12's vs two signals going into 2x12's each, and got 5 or 6 responses on how the use of the word Bi-Amping was improper in the title. then very in depth descriptions of what Bi-Amping IS. i said thankz, that's cool! so, i used the wrong word, any help on the volume question? more descriptions of bi-amping.

fucking pedantic clam-pussy holes. eat a dick. eat a whole BOWL of dicks.