Page 201 of 650
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:03 pm
by bloatedsack
That she nodded off.
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:07 pm
by repoman
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:18 pm
by Chankgeez
She's "feeling great".
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:30 pm
by repoman
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:36 pm
by Chankgeez
Exactly, this entire election season has been brought to you by former writers for the SciFi channel (or whatever they're calling it now).
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:15 pm
by repoman
body double
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:24 pm
by Chankgeez
Pretty sure the Secret Service is monitoring this thread. :surprise:
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:46 pm
by Gone Fission
Is Mulder in this thread because Hillary doesn't sweat? Hypohidrosis can make syncope or near syncope more frequent. Also it does unfortunately encourage the lizard-people conspiracists.
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:49 pm
by Chankgeez
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:53 pm
by rustywire
I try to avoid speculating on the health of others. But having familiarity with someone suffering degenerative, terminal illness (MS) I've been party to many spasm-induced falls... and seeing that video is most certainly cause for concern.
If HRC is suffering a nervous disorder, stress is a dangerous catalyst for accelerated decline. Few things are more stressful than an election year/campaign trail

Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 6:26 pm
by snipelfritz
Chankgeez wrote:Exactly, this entire election season has been brought to you by former writers for the SciFi channel (or whatever they're calling it now).
Speaking of things we should be focusing on making great again. I think it's called SyFy now which makes no sense at all.
Speculating about someone's health based on what you see on TV really is a dangerous rabbit hole to go down.
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:27 pm
by repoman
rustywire wrote:I try to avoid speculating on the health of others. But having familiarity with someone suffering degenerative, terminal illness (MS) I've been party to many spasm-induced falls... and seeing that video is most certainly cause for concern.
If HRC is suffering a nervous disorder, stress is a dangerous catalyst for accelerated decline. Few things are more stressful than an election year/campaign trail

Transverse sinus thromboli
Its in the wikileaks
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:31 pm
by repoman
snipelfritz wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Exactly, this entire election season has been brought to you by former writers for the SciFi channel (or whatever they're calling it now).
Speaking of things we should be focusing on making great again. I think it's called SyFy now which makes no sense at all.
Speculating about someone's health based on what you see on TV really is a dangerous rabbit hole to go down.
I recently saw a comparison between articles about Hillary's health being off limits to inquiry placed next to what these same article purveyors (Vox, Slate, NYtime, etc) did in regard to McCains health when he was running...guess what it illustrated...
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:19 pm
by MEC
[youtube]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=11-EAzsGxgQ[/youtube]
Re: Q: "What is Aleppo?" A: "You're kidding!"
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2016 8:45 pm
by snipelfritz
repoman wrote:snipelfritz wrote:Chankgeez wrote:Exactly, this entire election season has been brought to you by former writers for the SciFi channel (or whatever they're calling it now).
Speaking of things we should be focusing on making great again. I think it's called SyFy now which makes no sense at all.
Speculating about someone's health based on what you see on TV really is a dangerous rabbit hole to go down.
I recently saw a comparison between articles about Hillary's health being off limits to inquiry placed next to what these same article purveyors (Vox, Slate, NYtime, etc) did in regard to McCains health when he was running...guess what it illustrated...
I'd rather not see pictures/drawings of either one's bodies.
My problem is speculation vs. fact. And now we have more fact:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 37551.html
It's pneumonia.
