ilovefuzz.com

Invisible Man wrote:Antonio Gramsci is my shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

That book of letters he wrote to his kids is superbly poignant.

Deleuze is pretty great! Levinas too.

So from I can tell, we're going to collab on the spin pedal by programming philosopher-referential algorithms? Socrates is a delay since all he ever does is ask followup questions. Plato is a delay w/ pitch-shift because he start out the same as Socrates but diverges over time.

Derrida: looper
Horkheimer: flanger (slightly behind everyone)
Sokal: wah
Judith Butler: Sample and hold/random
Donna Haraway: Bit Crusher

Invisible Man wrote: Judith Butler: Sample and hold/random

More! What about Camille Paglia or Mario Praz? You know, since you talked about reading something out of nothing on the ILFcast.

odontophobia wrote: If I'm saying something philosophical outside the context of literature it's likely that I'm just dumbing really good theories down

Same.

Maybe we should do a literature special on the ILFcast.

Foucault: unplugged patch cable
Lacan: chorus
Marx: voltage-starved fuzz
Shklovsky: Ct5
Paglia: broken behringer multi Fx

I haven't live in these circles since I finished grad school. Trying to redeem my bullshit field in some microscopic way by working in cultural studies and grounded materialism. I like Barbara Foley, Jackson Lears, Jean Pfaelzer, Fredric Jameson, &c.

YES!

Iser: Transparent OD
Gadamer: Granular synthesis
Benjamin: Shimmer reverb

I don't know most of whomeber the duck you're talking about but IM and I are once again awake early as hell so here's to that.

Uh yeah. Raise a glass to zombitude.

Opened my Mr. Black pedal last night, saw the pcb was flipped and closed it. LOL. Totes not worth taking it apart for getting another verb in my Bitquest.

I do want to try my OBNE pedal, but I kind of want to sell it at the same time...

Eivind August wrote:

Invisible Man wrote:

Eivind August wrote:Dude, my hair is floppy as shit.

I'm also a philosopher™, and will meet your bashings with deductive logic and methodic arguments.

BUT THOSE WERE ALL COMPLIMENTS

I THOUGHT MY ANSWER SOUNDED HAPPY AND FUN

Wittgenstein was right.

Ludwig or the forumite? And about what???

ABOUT WHAT

*screams into void*

Remembered this thread because of a Derrida reference. Going through old notes looking for something, found the exact moment when I discovered that his work was shit. I was in a seminar with Rodolphe Gasche--dude translated most of Derrida into German--and Catherine Malabou, who co-authored a book with Derrida.

My last note reads 'this is complete mumbo-jumbo.'

But those two are pretty smart, I'm wrong a lot, so.

I have long since become accustomed to the truth that otherwise smart or even brilliant people can be completely, moronicly, insistently, and religiously wrong about things that they really should have known better about. So you may well have been right about that.