ilovefuzz.com

There's no reason AI should be involved. If they wanted to make something accessible, they could make a simple GUI and let people pick and choose how they want to customize it. The alternative being programming in C++ just feels like a dick move.

on my pedals with multiple hidden functions—including the EHX Canyon, Empress Nebulus, and CB/Cooper Gen Loss v2—i have to save presets. i can’t be fucking around with secondary knob functions in real time.

i think the Poly thing is that way because they can retain maximum control over the pedals/software/designs. hard to extract money from end users if it’s easier to use.

That pricing model and control setup on the Polyend just brings to mind the word so many other things do in our current hellscape: “enshitification.”

Casio is also throwing down on the fun portable sampler game. No real details or pricing: https://www.instagram.com/p/DT00o1uksT8 ... Z0cWlhZ2pn

dubkitty wrote: ↑Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:42 pmi think the Poly thing is that way because they can retain maximum control over the pedals/software/designs. hard to extract money from end users if it’s easier to use.

As for Polyend, I can't help but wonder if 3 knobs is just a cost-cutting move, rather than an artificial ceiling to stimy would-be opportunists. This may be planned obsolescene after all. They can learn from this launch and release a larger pedal with expanded functionality in the near future.

I can definitely see a scenario, where someone is conceptualizing oddball and niche exotic effects and then selling $5 algos, which could then be downloaded to various platforms---just like a software builder selling to Mac desktop, Android, Linux, iOS.

One of the biggest things holding back innovation is $$$ and resources. If someone has a lot of quirky ideas, but no money to get things off the ground, I could see a certain amount of exploratory effects gaining traction. In an open-doors world, you wouldn't have to worry about commercial rent/warehouse fees/unused or obsolete parts/risks to your business if a design flops. With no overhead and little fear of a failed launch, there'd be a lot more freedom to take risks with more exotic and challenging designs.

This really sums up the pedal world---

On one hand, you've got companies trying to incorporate AI into open-source, crowd-driven pedals. On the other hand, T-Rex is unveiling a stereo update to wire delay. That's right, cold war tech is still not dead, folks.

presenting the T-Rex Binson Stereophonica ($3,000 for those of you decadent enough for such an indulgence)

Here's a couple product pages:

https://www.perfectcircuit.com/t-rex-bi ... onica.html
https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail ... drum-delay



It's even got MIDI, peeps, because that's what your 1940s technology needs---modern, digital precision.



Also, from T-Rex comes the Roommate D'lux Stereo Reverb. (8 algos for $299 USD)

https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail ... verb-pedal

echorec wrote: ↑Thu Jan 22, 2026 4:36 pm

Which part do I stomp on in order to get my must-have, non-negotiable tap-tempto?

Are people in this day and age expected to figure out tapped-temptos on their own without smashing things underfoot?

That's why they're injecting AI into pedals—to further grind musicians under the heel of our digital overlords.

Red Panda is still teasing out their stripped-down Raster evolution. (they're now saying March is the target with a tag of about $229)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1O7UGo_2Mc (Delicious Audio)

Seance wrote: ↑Thu Jan 22, 2026 6:00 pmAre people in this day and age expected to figure out tapped-temptos on their own without smashing things underfoot?

That's why they're injecting AI into pedals—to further grind musicians under the heel of our digital overlords.

While you could always use the two expression ports or MIDI, why would you want do any stomping? That's kids stuff. What you'll want is a neural implant, so you can just blink your tempos like Morse code.

·−···
··———
···——