ilovefuzz.com

Jesus Was a Robot wrote:

Olin wrote:Actual and Jwar on a tag team against Witt.
I expect to see at least 4 chokeslams and one of you better throw up. Velvet Hammer isn't a person, it's a special move you can only use when blood is drawn.

Where's my movie?

It's another special move. When cornered a flurry of sharpened Moana DVD's are unleashed on Witt.

man, this thread wasn't as entertaining as i thought it would be.

The Velvet Hammer wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:I like all the posters in the list and I like Witt as a poster in the aggregate but while I agree that he got banned because our moderators are zigging where they should be zagging (obviously they don't feel this way) this thread is just kind of lame and potshotty.

Where would you prefer I zag, i'm open to reasonable criticism.

Unless you're implying I should zig-a-zig-ah which I absolutely refuse to do.

Well you gotta get with my friends, obviously.


I just think that the Witt/Troy Sanders/Bossman etc. Style of posters are good examples of not really bannable offenses. Do I wish there were fewer personal attacks and more fun references to philosophers? Definitely.

Do I wish they added more value to the forum and is it debatable that they're just assholes being assholes and existing to skirt rule 1? Of course.

Are they contributing less to the community than the content farmers, who really aren't that much different than the cydonias etc? Probably not.

Just my 2cents.

D.o.S. wrote:

The Velvet Hammer wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:I like all the posters in the list and I like Witt as a poster in the aggregate but while I agree that he got banned because our moderators are zigging where they should be zagging (obviously they don't feel this way) this thread is just kind of lame and potshotty.

Where would you prefer I zag, i'm open to reasonable criticism.

Unless you're implying I should zig-a-zig-ah which I absolutely refuse to do.

Well you gotta get with my friends, obviously.


I just think that the Witt/Troy Sanders/Bossman etc. Style of posters are good examples of not really bannable offenses. Do I wish there were fewer personal attacks and more fun references to philosophers? Definitely.

Do I wish they added more value to the forum and is it debatable that they're just assholes being assholes and existing to skirt rule 1? Of course.

Are they contributing less to the community than the content farmers, who really aren't that much different than the cydonias etc? Probably not.

Just my 2cents.

Kinda this.

At least boring occasionally annoying trolls are something to the community. Click miners are just nothing.

That said, yawn at this original thread and this sort of trolling.

Mudfuzz wrote:

Wittgenstein wrote:Rugged Individualism

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlbZM7kOr4s[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlbZM7kOr4s

That guy is like Ron Swanson's long lost cousin lol.

Ghost Hip wrote:man, this thread wasn't as entertaining as i thought it would be.

Sorry.

D.o.S. wrote:

The Velvet Hammer wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:I like all the posters in the list and I like Witt as a poster in the aggregate but while I agree that he got banned because our moderators are zigging where they should be zagging (obviously they don't feel this way) this thread is just kind of lame and potshotty.

Where would you prefer I zag, i'm open to reasonable criticism.

Unless you're implying I should zig-a-zig-ah which I absolutely refuse to do.

Well you gotta get with my friends, obviously.


I just think that the Witt/Troy Sanders/Bossman etc. Style of posters are good examples of not really bannable offenses. Do I wish there were fewer personal attacks and more fun references to philosophers? Definitely.

Do I wish they added more value to the forum and is it debatable that they're just assholes being assholes and existing to skirt rule 1? Of course.

Are they contributing less to the community than the content farmers, who really aren't that much different than the cydonias etc? Probably not.

Just my 2cents.

Well i'll stipulate to that if you tell me what you want, what you really really want.

Perhaps some new guidelines for content farmers are needed then, it's not something i've personally paid much attention too because it isn't reported much.

The main aim of any moderation is to keep things friendly and inviting to outsiders so yeah, sometimes gotta make a judgement call on people just being assholes

Ghost Hip wrote:man, this thread wasn't as entertaining as i thought it would be.

Mostly this though.

Let's all JTT ourselves.

If we're in the spotlight of fame and fortune, while wanting to enjoy a higher education, travel, start a family, etc., let's ameliorate ourselves before criticizing others.

coldbrightsunlight wrote:

Ghost Hip wrote:man, this thread wasn't as entertaining as i thought it would be.

Mostly this though.

Well if a Spice Girls off isn't good enough for you then there's just no pleasing some people

JonnyAngle wrote:Let's all JTT ourselves.

If we're in the spotlight of fame and fortune, while wanting to enjoy a higher education, travel, start a family, etc., let's ameliorate ourselves before criticizing others.

should have gone with spice girls instead of JTT

The Velvet Hammer wrote:

coldbrightsunlight wrote:

Ghost Hip wrote:man, this thread wasn't as entertaining as i thought it would be.

Mostly this though.

Well if a Spice Girls off isn't good enough for you then there's just no pleasing some people

Sorry Hams I did enjoy the spice girls bit.

Curious what you guys mean when you say content farmers and click miners?

A lot of people say bread is bad for you, but I like bread. Sometimes I make my own bread from scratch, it's very satisfying.

actual wrote:Curious what you guys mean when you say content farmers and click miners?

People that don't interact with the forum beyond self-promotion. And sure, there's a bit of the pornography test here ("I know it when I see it"), but I think we've all experienced people who don't actually care about discussing fun things regarding effects, waffles, shitty movies, or whatever, and only post here to hawk whatever they've got going.

Maybe we can call it the "I'm not here to be chummy and chatty" test? RIP Cydonia

actual wrote:Curious what you guys mean when you say content farmers and click miners?

I didn't know either. Had to PM D.o.S. Should have asked in this thread in case others had the same question.

Sorry you had to explain twice D.o.S.