Page 3 of 4
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:06 am
by rfurtkamp
I'm just the boring old Roland catalog.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:44 am
by jrmy
rfurtkamp wrote:If I wanted this, I already have a Midiverb II and a fuzz pedal.
Pretty sure that if you checked your gear piles, you already do have both. Or an old BOSS rack unit that does it better.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:47 am
by echorec
D.o.S. wrote:I love seeing a poster who is basically a glorified Reverb sale newsletter get a little saucy from time to time.
I'm playing the long game.
step 1: hook you guys up with sales
step 2: monitor B/S/T thread for second-tier discounting
step 3: retrieve and assimilate
There are two kinds of pedals: pedals I own and the pedals I will own. You can't have it all at once though. That's where you guys come in.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:50 am
by rfurtkamp
jrmy wrote:rfurtkamp wrote:If I wanted this, I already have a Midiverb II and a fuzz pedal.
Pretty sure that if you checked your gear piles, you already do have both. Or an old BOSS rack unit that does it better.
I already have the MvII and a ton of stuff, that's for sure.
Boss rackmount, I only use a venerable GL-100 and that's only a two-channel preamp. Last other one I had was a DE-200 but that was a LOT more limited than the Digitech RDS stuff that did the same stuff, only better.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:00 am
by D.o.S.
echorec wrote:D.o.S. wrote:I love seeing a poster who is basically a glorified Reverb sale newsletter get a little saucy from time to time.
I'm playing the long game.
step 1: hook you guys up with sales
step 2: monitor B/S/T thread for second-tier discounting
step 3: retrieve and assimilate
There are two kinds of pedals: pedals I own and the pedals I will own. You can't have it all at once though. That's where you guys come in.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:15 pm
by SonicReducer
I bought one of these for the following reasons:
* I don't have to shlep my SPX-90 to gigs, now i have a simple stomp box
* I wasted money on a crappy 'loveless' pedal that has skanky fuzz and rubbishy, lame echo.reverb
* The keeley 'dark side' pedal is actually alot of fun
* The extra FX-loop on the pedal allows you to feed your Triangle muff, RN-2, wah into the pedal to get more shoegaze mush
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:08 am
by dubkitty
a better demo:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW35nLGbvWE[/youtube]
here you can see some of the versatility, and also some of the arbitraryness. i really want to know if you can adjust the time sweep of the faux vibrato-bar swoops.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:23 am
by jrfox92
Keeley Dealey wrote:Jazzmaster P90 pickups
Well, which is it?
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:35 am
by Inconuucl
I'd actually go for the reverb side of this pedal if it was included with a delay in a package like the Caverns, maybe minus the unnecessary triggered pitch bends.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:46 am
by jrfox92
Inconuucl wrote:maybe minus the unnecessary triggered pitch bends.
Yeah, that came off as a little gimmicky and unnecessary, to me.
The more videos I watch, though, the more I'm interested.
Although, only if it were in a trade or super discounted or something.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:06 pm
by D.o.S.
warmth controls tone
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:29 pm
by SonicReducer
ThurberMingus wrote:That Noisemaker loveless is probably the second stupidest pedal of all time. First being occupied by their "Daydream Nation + shimmer reverb" pedal.
"Fuzz and Reverb right? Which fuzz? Which reverb? Doesn't matter stick em in a box and used bootleg artwork."
Cool to see Keeley doing this though, I mean lame but cool for them. AFAIK the Digiverb is one of the only good places outside of a rack and/or multi to get that classic mbv verb tone.
+1
I was a desperate sucker and bought a 'loveless'..Guy took 3 months to build it, and it was the biggest P.o.S pedal I ever bought. OK, the fuzz was noisy enough, but the 'reverb'/'delay' nonsense was negligible and completely demolished by the fuzz. SO glad I hocked it for $100 which has gone toward purchasing the 'loomer'!!
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:42 am
by Teej212
The shimmer actually sounds good and I usually don't like that effect. Definitely a gimmicky pedal but I don't hate it.
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:53 am
by rustywire
A contender for WOAT pedal layout.
Dear builders: never make a pedal with footswitches, toggles & knobs crammed so closely together.
D.o.S. wrote:echorec wrote:D.o.S. wrote:I love seeing a poster who is basically a glorified Reverb sale newsletter get a little saucy from time to time.
I'm playing the long game.
step 1: hook you guys up with sales
step 2: monitor B/S/T thread for second-tier discounting
step 3: retrieve and assimilate
There are two kinds of pedals: pedals I own and the pedals I will own. You can't have it all at once though. That's where you guys come in.
REKT, KEKT AND DOWN TO COLLECT
Re: Keeley Loomer
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:55 am
by BoatRich
I kind of want this for a lead tone in a box sort of pedal, the reverse+fuzz seems like it'd be cool for that. I'm wondering if putting a stereo delay through the loop and the input would give you parallel clean delay?