Page 3 of 5

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:29 pm
by Fuzzy Fred
wsas3 wrote:I hate Starbucks because they over-roast the beans on purpose


yeah, i never got that. i usually drink my coffee black and it just tastes awful the way starbucks makes it

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:37 pm
by sonidero
Blackened Soul wrote:
Chankgeez wrote:
Blackened Soul wrote:
wsas3 wrote:I hate Starbucks because they over-roast the beans on purpose

Explain.


How much of an explanation of that is needed?

How many things do like that taste burnt?

Explanation is needed because a lot of people don't like really dark roasted coffee in general and I want to know if it is a hate of roasts such as french roast vs light roast coffee. I have never thought of their coffe as burnt as much as bitter.


WHAT ARE YOU MISSING... Say Steve get a Grande two raws and some 1/2 n 1/2 n burn out while winkin at the Hipp(ster)ie girls and lamp on the porch w/ free mifi... Ol school Tuesday morning...

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:42 pm
by Jenesis
Arthur, Neville or Barry.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:47 pm
by snipelfritz
+1 for dark roast coffee being horrible. I want to taste coffee not roasting.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:56 pm
by wsas3
Ok here's the explanation. I know this because my step-dads friends is in a high position in the company and explained it to him when they went out drinking:
It's not just dark roast. It's burnt. There's a difference. That's why it smells so strongly when you pass a starbucks, and not as much when you pass by a coffee shop that has very good coffee.
If starbucks was just a single store, people would go there and take a sip and go "wtf? This is burnt." And they would go on with their lives and never go back.
Thing is, when you and millions of other americans are leaving for work and NEED coffee, starbucks is most convenient. Since you go there because you have to, you start getting used to the taste, and no other coffee appeals to you as much as their coffee.
Thats why, even if i liked their coffee, i would never drink it.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:18 am
by Chankgeez
wsas3 wrote:Ok here's the explanation. I know this because my step-dads friends is in a high position in the company and explained it to him when they went out drinking:
It's not just dark roast. It's burnt. There's a difference. That's why it smells so strongly when you pass a starbucks, and not as much when you pass by a coffee shop that has very good coffee.
If starbucks was just a single store, people would go there and take a sip and go "wtf? This is burnt." And they would go on with their lives and never go back.
Thing is, when you and millions of other americans are leaving for work and NEED coffee, starbucks is most convenient. Since you go there because you have to, you start getting used to the taste, and no other coffee appeals to you as much as their coffee.
Thats why, even if i liked their coffee, i would never drink it.


That's ... um ... the best explanation ... I've ever heard?

OK, here's the real explanation: As people've already stated, when coffee is roasted too darkly it obscures the actual flavor of the beans. What "too darkly roasted" actually is comes down to a matter of personal taste, but there's a point where the degree of the roast begins to encroach upon the optimal flavor of the beans. Over roasting is often used to cover up the lack of good flavor in poor quality beans. Starbucks is now so huge that I can't imagine that the increase in numbers of cups served hasn't negatively effected the quality of the coffee that they're peddling. Bitter taste is a sign of poor quality. Think diner coffee.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:31 am
by wsas3
That was obviously sarcastic, but I have no idea why...

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:38 am
by Chankgeez
Sarcastic? Yes, because it doesn't really do very much to explain things.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:40 am
by wsas3
It explained why they purposely over-roast their beans, which is what I was asked?

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:41 am
by behndy
i read it to say that Starbucks burns, not deep roasts, their beans on purpose so that people get use to the taste (because of the convenience) and prefer SB flavah over other, technically better flavors?

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:48 am
by Chankgeez
wsas3 wrote:It explained why they purposely over-roast their beans, which is what I was asked?


OK, I didn't get that from your explanation. Maybe it's my lack of comprehension skills?

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:48 am
by wsas3
behndy wrote:i read it to say that Starbucks burns, not deep roasts, their beans on purpose so that people get use to the taste (because of the convenience) and prefer SB flavah over other, technically better flavors?

Yep, and that's what I was asked, so... y u so mean 2 me? :cry:

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:56 am
by behndy
*rips off clothes*

*knocks over WassY, stands over hands in air*

*roars*

RARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

*WassY whispers*

"um.... y u need to be nekid for protection?"

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:01 am
by snipelfritz
Page is so confusing.

Re: Starbucks Alternate Identities

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:08 am
by theactionindex
Naked Behndy is the least confusing part of this page. :joy:

EDIT: referring to previous page. and stuff.