Page 191 of 3279
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:30 am
by nieh
IN: Nano Clone
OUT: Nothing.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:08 pm
by devnulljp
SPACERITUAL wrote:Go fuck yourself.
You ship a guitar across the globe without packing it properly and then you tell the buyer to go fuck themselves? Wow, you're a major league asshole.
Welcome to the do-not-deal-with-these-guys-ever list.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:59 pm
by futuresailors
devnulljp wrote:SPACERITUAL wrote:Go fuck yourself.
You ship a guitar across the globe without packing it properly and then you tell the buyer to go fuck themselves? Wow, you're a major league asshole.
Welcome to the do-not-deal-with-these-guys-ever list.
I don't think spacey's the seller dev.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:13 pm
by devnulljp
In that case, I owe him an apology.
Just picked up a couple of nice vintage fuzz-wahs.
Rosac Nu-Fuzz-Wah. It's a Fuzzrite + wah (although the module looks a bit different from the standard Sprague module in Fuzzrites and my Foxey Ladies).
1969 pot codes.
Cleaned the pots and the switch --> Killer fuzz. Sounds different to my Fuzzrites. Here lies Black Keys noises.
Kinda iffy inductorless wah, more like a tone control.
Foxx Fuzz-Wah-Volume -- DoA, but all that was wrong with it was the battery snap wasn't connected properly. 30s w/ soldering iron, a bit of a pot clean (and a vacuum, whose bright idea was it to cover a pedal in student-flat carpet?) and it's awesome. Not a bad wah either for a change. TDK inductor, same as the Californian Thomas-Organ/Vox wahs.
72ish? Can't see any pot date codes or anything else to determine the age.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:19 pm
by StopReferencing
Those Foxx's are gooooood.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:43 pm
by devnulljp
StopReferencing wrote:Those Foxx's are gooooood.
The switch placement is kinda a pain though, because the volume pedal function has toe-down as minimum volume, so it's easy to silence the pedal when you hit the fuzz stomp switch.
Other than that (and the barf-covered carpet), it sure sounds great.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:19 pm
by foomanfat
Are the new fOXX Tone Machines worth a jank or should I try out a clone?
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:26 pm
by bob the r0bot
foomanfat wrote:Are the new fOXX Tone Machines worth a jank or should I try out a clone?
I had one. Loved it and regret selling it to this day.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:36 pm
by StopReferencing
devnulljp wrote:StopReferencing wrote:Those Foxx's are gooooood.
The switch placement is kinda a pain though, because the volume pedal function has toe-down as minimum volume, so it's easy to silence the pedal when you hit the fuzz stomp switch.
Other than that (and the barf-covered carpet), it sure sounds great.
Disable the volume function.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:38 pm
by StopReferencing
foomanfat wrote:Are the new fOXX Tone Machines worth a jank or should I try out a clone?
I thought it was okay compared to the old ones. I'd get Creepy Brad to make you one with footswitchable octave before going the reissue route.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:38 pm
by univalve
StopReferencing wrote:devnulljp wrote:StopReferencing wrote:Those Foxx's are gooooood.
The switch placement is kinda a pain though, because the volume pedal function has toe-down as minimum volume, so it's easy to silence the pedal when you hit the fuzz stomp switch.
Other than that (and the barf-covered carpet), it sure sounds great.
Disable the volume function.
Reverse it?
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:41 pm
by StopReferencing
univalve wrote:StopReferencing wrote:devnulljp wrote:StopReferencing wrote:Those Foxx's are gooooood.
The switch placement is kinda a pain though, because the volume pedal function has toe-down as minimum volume, so it's easy to silence the pedal when you hit the fuzz stomp switch.
Other than that (and the barf-covered carpet), it sure sounds great.
Disable the volume function.
Reverse it?
Different strokes. I wasn't a fan of how the volume function sounded, let alone the direction in which it operated.
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:16 pm
by theavondon
StopReferencing wrote:foomanfat wrote:Are the new fOXX Tone Machines worth a jank or should I try out a clone?
I thought it was okay compared to the old ones. I'd get Creepy Brad to make you one with footswitchable octave before going the reissue route.
THIS
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:47 pm
by 01010111
Incoming: akai mpc 1000
Re: What is in the post? The thread of and for GAS!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:52 pm
by bob the r0bot
wfs1234 wrote:Incoming: akai mpc 1000
Oh god, so much want!