ilovefuzz.com

askashrub wrote:I think it feels pretty great. You can get a good degree of change with the pressure.

Have they replaced the standard TC switch? It certainly looks different, when side-by-side with the old model. The skirt is closed, instead of having that open x pattern, and it looks like it's slightly shorter (possibly wider, too) than a standard bypass switch. (although that could partially be caused by the angle of the images)

echorec wrote:is it just me, or is TC's shimmer bank glassier and harsher than most shimverbs?
It sounds a bit like flerb being strangled inside a test tube to me.

so... they invented the ILF-friendly shimmer?

ProCarsteNation wrote:

echorec wrote:is it just me, or is TC's shimmer bank glassier and harsher than most shimverbs?
It sounds a bit like flerb being strangled inside a test tube to me.

so... they invented the ILF-friendly shimmer?

I like shimmer with a bass.

echorec wrote:

askashrub wrote:I think it feels pretty great. You can get a good degree of change with the pressure.

Have they replaced the standard TC switch? It certainly looks different, when side-by-side with the old model. The skirt is closed, instead of having that open x pattern, and it looks like it's slightly shorter (possibly wider, too) than a standard bypass switch. (although that could partially be caused by the angle of the images)

The switch on the current pedals is just a switch. The new model would need a different mechanism to provide expression data.

The mash feature with the toneprint seems like it could be potentially awesome.

whoismarykelly wrote:The switch on the current pedals is just a switch. The new model would need a different mechanism to provide expression data.

Yep. Good deduction. I was on fumes last night, or my brain could've gotten me to this next step.

Matthews recently unveiled the Chemist. (is it a delay, harmonizer...is it a weird modulation unit?)



Also, the upcoming Epoch Deluxe is going to be $329, which seems a bit steep compared to pedals like the Nemesis and even the RE-20. No tap-tempo and no preset recall also makes it feel a bit behind features-wise.

Ultimately I hope it sounds good and sells well for them, but it's probably not for me.

echorec wrote:Matthews recently unveiled the Chemist. (is it a delay, harmonizer...is it a weird modulation unit?)

Maybe it's Maybelline.

jrfox92 wrote:

echorec wrote:Matthews recently unveiled the Chemist. (is it a delay, harmonizer...is it a weird modulation unit?)

Maybe it's Maybelline.

There are no good shampoo smileys.

echorec wrote:

jrfox92 wrote:

echorec wrote:Matthews recently unveiled the Chemist. (is it a delay, harmonizer...is it a weird modulation unit?)

Maybe it's Maybelline.

There are no good shampoo smileys.

Not a shampoo, but how about a floor wax and dessert topping?

dunbine wrote:Not a shampoo, but how about a floor wax and dessert topping?

That'll have to do.

Is the MF-104M coming back?

Sweetwater just included this note in their Gearfest newsletter.

Be sure to visit the Moog Pedal Factory, and watch the pedal pros build the fantastic M4-104M Delay on-site. Who knows? Maybe they'll even sign one for you.

..this is strange..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsCEKRx-M64&t=12s

cant get the damn video on here...ugh.

comesect2.0 wrote:..this is strange..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsCEKRx-M64&t=12s

cant get the damn video on here...ugh.

The second I saw the title I knew this would be expensive. I didn't think it would be $1800 though

https://reverb.com/item/2636821-echo-cl ... on-1-of-20

right, just looked that up on reverb...wowzer....lol