I wasn't going to bother following this up, but this post bothered me.
Tom Dalton wrote:
It's TRUE that I suggested Rose check into a mental hospital. This was after being threatened that "I'd been given many chances before something bad happens," and after about a dozen ranting Rose emails (all from different addresses, with fake subject lines), telling me how completely evil I was for banning someone with mental issues.
No, that's BS. I said you were being an ass because you switched from a temporary ban to a permanent ban, and in the same email blocked me completely from contact without having a chance to contest it. It's not surprising I contacted your from a different address after that. Maybe it wasn't good net etiquette, but neither was what you did.
You're also manipulating what I said in terms of something "bad" happening, that's not what I meant at all, and making it look like I was making threats even after I explained what I meant is dishonest, as is continually calling me a troll; who am I riling up?
My comments with regards my disability was simply the fact that you called my behaviour frightening constantly, but didn't take my autism into account at all. Not that it justifies wrong doing, but it does explain some of the way I act in terms of my perceived tone that you find "creepy". And you just ignored it and continued to lambaste me.
I am a maniacal tyrant who bans, locks, and deletes everything I disagree with. Also, Rose is still the only user I've ever banned, and ILF sees maybe one locked thread a year, and between 0-2 deleted posts a year.
Given how long you've been running the forum and the size of it, that's hardly something to celebrate.
Also, how does that justify anything? Is it okay to murder or rape if you only do it the once? Please.
The main problem here is that you can say what you like about me, and I can't say anything back. You banned me from the board and censor anything I have to say. There is no public place I am allowed to express my side of things and what happened.
I created the sockgazer account to prove I was a perfectly viable member, and prove you wrong. No matter how many people think I should be gone, doesn't mean I should. If anything it should be your job to tell people to cop on and get along.
If you were able to argue about this sort of thing like an adult, there wouldn't be an issue. I did nothing wrong as Sockgazer and that account should not have been banned, no matter how many people circlejerked in with you against it.
Saying shit about someone and then censoring their opinion, denying them a chance to speak back is little more than bullying. Even if I can create an alt people won't take it seriously since they know it'll be immediately banned.
This is what you said at first -
I issued a ban as a quick hold, because I wanted to talk to you personally before you carried everything over to General Discussion.
Well, it wasn't a permaban...it was meant to stop things. For one hour. So I could take care of real life things and come back to this. I wanted to simply respond to your PM, but you'd taken things to General Discussion. You certainly weren't banned for posting an apology.
Yet by the next email it switched to a permaban, and you ignoring me completely. Was this just an outright lie? You never explained to me that it wasn't, yet mock the idea that I consider you a bad person. Who wouldn't after that?
I actually want to get on with people. I am not making threats. I am pointing out that I am being denied a fair chance to defend myself. I cannot see a good person painting someone in a bad light and denying themselves a chance to defend themselves. That's all I want. If you're not a big bad nazi mod like you love to mock, you'd allow at least that. I fail to see what it's hurting to at least allow people to hear me out, but you insist on deleting my posts on top of the ban. People already weren't particularly reacting it - it was a couple of pages back. So why was it deleted?
But you consider me Icky and won't talk to me on the level about this, ever. If you had once been fair and rational past that point there would not be an issue. We could still have a decent conversation and make up. Maybe I'll even apologise for something. Maybe I won't even ask to come back. But for the better person here supposedly, you refuse to do this. While most dislike me since they're falling into line, there are still a few people that can contest for me on this forum or on Devi's. Maybe you should hear their side instead of just those you agree with?
And since I'm outspoken and have been banned elsewhere, I'm automatically wrong and anything you do automatically right. I am not doing this to be some crazy mad stalker. I came up in this thread, I was on edge after bad experience at the Devi forum, and I had no other way to defend myself. Of course you'll claim it makes me look even worse, but if people actually read what I was saying instead of believing you, that wouldn't be so. If you want me gone completely, then at least stop spreading bullshit about me on publically readable forums.
Please go away.