ilovefuzz.com

Mudfuzz wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:

behndy wrote:neh. them bitches wouldn't have stood a chance in modern times against the athleticism of average players, let alone exceptional ones.

it's like how the Beatles aren't really that good unless you have an emotional attachment. props for being first'ish, but people have taken that meh baseline and built way better off of it.

You straight tripping son.

Pretty much. you kind'a have to look at pop music before and after and look at the effect, and sometimes… ok always… the coming up with a idea is better then perfecting it and polishing it like a golden turd from on high.

behndy wrote:NOPE. BEATLES SUCK.

.... i mean, to me they do. but i'm not into that kind of music really. and i've heard some, never dug anything enough to want to listen to more.

buuuuuuuut it always seems like they just get love for being the first, which is cool and all, but doesn't make it GOOD.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

Like The Beatles or not, you have to at least acknowledge their massive impact on popular music, turd pants. Which it seems, you kinda do. Kinda begrudgingly though. They had enough of an appeal to totally transform shit (obviously not literally, because their source material was far superior to their own output) into gold.

jwar wrote:Pic just for you Excane

Long drive over. Cabs received.

LOUD AS FUCK.

Dude. That's like what I want my new demo setup to be.

and if you EVVVEEEERRRR think about selling that MTD...... come to papa.

Chankgeez wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:

behndy wrote:neh. them bitches wouldn't have stood a chance in modern times against the athleticism of average players, let alone exceptional ones.

it's like how the Beatles aren't really that good unless you have an emotional attachment. props for being first'ish, but people have taken that meh baseline and built way better off of it.

You straight tripping son.

Pretty much. you kind'a have to look at pop music before and after and look at the effect, and sometimes… ok always… the coming up with a idea is better then perfecting it and polishing it like a golden turd from on high.

behndy wrote:NOPE. BEATLES SUCK.

.... i mean, to me they do. but i'm not into that kind of music really. and i've heard some, never dug anything enough to want to listen to more.

buuuuuuuut it always seems like they just get love for being the first, which is cool and all, but doesn't make it GOOD.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

D.o.S. wrote:You straight tripping son.

Like The Beatles or not, you have to at least acknowledge their massive impact on popular music, turd pants. Which it seems, you kinda do. Kinda begrudgingly though. They had enough of an appeal to totally transform shit (obviously not literally, because their source material was far superior to their own output) into gold.

More over without the Beatles the Beach Boys would have taken over completely and pop music as a whole would have turned to liquid shit.

I liked Pet Sounds more than anything the Beatles ever made. At least that I've heard so far. And pop music is kinda liquid shit already...

ChetMagongalo wrote:I liked Pet Sounds more than anything the Beatles ever made. At least that I've heard so far. And pop music is kinda liquid shit already...

but maybe it wouldn't be liquid shit already if Pet Sounds had never been made

Bros. The Beatles main influence was on the culture & content of pop music. Boybands and idols and shit. You can thank the Beatles for that.

PS Beach Boys>Beatles

futuresailors wrote:Bros. The Beatles main influence was on the culture & content of pop music. Boybands and idols and shit. You can thank the Beatles for that.

PS Beach Boys>Beatles

Balderdash! there is no music other than pop music! everything else is just noise and jazz.

Everything popular is wrong

ChetMagongalo wrote:Everything popular is wrong

[youtube][/youtube]

iiiiiiiiii've..... never listened to the Beach Boys.

i dunno. stuff like Hendrix, Beatles, Marley.... i'm not talking shit i just don't think it's that good. musically. they might be super good salesman and there's always credit for starting a style, or ripping off a style and making it into a format popular music will incorporate but.... yeah. MEH.

even stuff i adore like Aphex and Bjork. and i loved Primus when i was a kicken. the first albums may not hold up that well.

but to me those three are way bigger influences on music that i'd care about than a lot of the stuff that seems like people either love it because they grew up with it or they love it because they've been told how awesome and BESTEST EVER it is.

behndy wrote:iiiiiiiiii've..... never listened to the Beach Boys.

i dunno. stuff like Hendrix, Beatles, Marley.... i'm not talking shit i just don't think it's that good. musically. they might be super good salesman and there's always credit for starting a style, or ripping off a style and making it into a format popular music will incorporate but.... yeah. MEH.

even stuff i adore like Aphex and Bjork. and i loved Primus when i was a kicken. the first albums may not hold up that well.

but to me those three are way bigger influences on music that i'd care about than a lot of the stuff that seems like people either love it because they grew up with it or they love it because they've been told how awesome and BESTEST EVER it is.

And yet Bjork and Les are Beatles fans Aphex, I'm not sure… but it would not surprise me really For me it goes more than one way. There is music I just love because I love it because to me it is awesome and music I like from the perspective of I love musical evolution, I like where you can take a 20's blues recording and find connections to stuff like Square Pusher and Napalm Death but also that means that "new" stuff like Square Pusher and Aphex really never sounded very "new" to me either because music is a constant evolution of taking old ideas, repackaging them and what you get is what will be

Mudfuzz wrote:For me it goes more than one way. There is music I just love because I love it because to me it is awesome and music I like from the perspective of I love musical evolution, I like where you can take a 20's blues recording and find connections to stuff like Square Pusher and Napalm Death but also that means that "new" stuff like Square Pusher and Aphex really never sounded very "new" to me either because music is a constant evolution of taking old ideas, repackaging them and what you get is what will be

Hell, I even hear some of the Beatles more droney, psychedelic influence when I listen to Isis. Hell, listen to "She's So Heavy", the last few minutes wouldn't sound out of place in pretty much any post-rock song.

bigchiefbc wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:For me it goes more than one way. There is music I just love because I love it because to me it is awesome and music I like from the perspective of I love musical evolution, I like where you can take a 20's blues recording and find connections to stuff like Square Pusher and Napalm Death but also that means that "new" stuff like Square Pusher and Aphex really never sounded very "new" to me either because music is a constant evolution of taking old ideas, repackaging them and what you get is what will be

Hell, I even hear some of the Beatles more droney, psychedelic influence when I listen to Isis. Hell, listen to "She's So Heavy", the last few minutes wouldn't sound out of place in pretty much any post-rock song.

I agree totally. But then to me most post Rock sounds like Pink Floyd in some way… and they were again influenced by…

Mudfuzz wrote:

bigchiefbc wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:For me it goes more than one way. There is music I just love because I love it because to me it is awesome and music I like from the perspective of I love musical evolution, I like where you can take a 20's blues recording and find connections to stuff like Square Pusher and Napalm Death but also that means that "new" stuff like Square Pusher and Aphex really never sounded very "new" to me either because music is a constant evolution of taking old ideas, repackaging them and what you get is what will be

Hell, I even hear some of the Beatles more droney, psychedelic influence when I listen to Isis. Hell, listen to "She's So Heavy", the last few minutes wouldn't sound out of place in pretty much any post-rock song.

I agree totally. But then to me most post Rock sounds like Pink Floyd in some way… and they were again influenced by…

Oh yeah, pretty much every post-rock band rips off Floyd. Not that there's anything wrong with that. The Beatles were ripping shit off, too. Their first few records were just repackaged Motown tunes. At least in their latter years they tried to at least be a little transformative and add their own flavor a bit.