ilovefuzz.com

that makes me want an organizer real bad

organizer be the sheeit. btw cass, didn't you used to have a tremolessence? what made you opt for the polypus?

yerp
had one for awhile and then i dunno, i wanted to try something else and at first wanted a semaphore, then ended up with a boss slicer
definitely a rad pedal but i only used the more traditional tremolo settings on it
my m9 had a pattern tremolo i always enjoyed using
saw the polypus had that and a bunch of other stuff
bought it blindly and have enjoyed my decision thus far

i'm probably going to sound a little pompous or full of myself here
but i've realized that it's the small details of a pedal that helps me decide whether or not i want to use it
meaning, everything i have on my board right now is voiced(how they sit in with a mix) very well.
i don't know if that means tone or what, but this is something i've been reminding myself.

Not pompous at all.

Casavettes wrote:yerp
had one for awhile and then i dunno, i wanted to try something else and at first wanted a semaphore, then ended up with a boss slicer
definitely a rad pedal but i only used the more traditional tremolo settings on it
my m9 had a pattern tremolo i always enjoyed using
saw the polypus had that and a bunch of other stuff
bought it blindly and have enjoyed my decision thus far

i'm probably going to sound a little pompous or full of myself here
but i've realized that it's the small details of a pedal that helps me decide whether or not i want to use it
meaning, everything i have on my board right now is voiced(how they sit in with a mix) very well.
i don't know if that means tone or what, but this is something i've been reminding myself.

I've been back and forth on getting a Polypus for a while. Can't shake the idea of the tap tempo problem, even though they updated it.
It seems perfect, aside from my dumb paranoia.

But from the demos the polypus sounded very noisy. Is that not an issue? I mean, otherwise it would be almost perfect, but the demos made me shun. (Well, and the detail that I have not found any sort of trem I liked yet, it might just not fit my playing.)

haven't noticed anything noisy out of mine and tap tempo seems to work, although i admittedly don't even use it that often.

Casavettes wrote:yerp
had one for awhile and then i dunno, i wanted to try something else and at first wanted a semaphore, then ended up with a boss slicer
definitely a rad pedal but i only used the more traditional tremolo settings on it
my m9 had a pattern tremolo i always enjoyed using
saw the polypus had that and a bunch of other stuff
bought it blindly and have enjoyed my decision thus far

i'm probably going to sound a little pompous or full of myself here
but i've realized that it's the small details of a pedal that helps me decide whether or not i want to use it
meaning, everything i have on my board right now is voiced(how they sit in with a mix) very well.
i don't know if that means tone or what, but this is something i've been reminding myself.

Having the awareness and knowledge of self to identify what you like about something and why is far from pompous.

It means you have taste and you're passionate about it, and this shiz in general

Getting everything to fit into a mix (without clashing) is kinda like bagging groceries, heh

amen

It's a work in progress, eventually the US600 will be replaced with an EQD Organizer and the FX600 will be replaced with either a EQD The Depths or a GHE Stonefish.

Mini Mini

drehpehs wrote:


It's a work in progress, eventually the US600 will be replaced with an EQD Organizer and the FX600 will be replaced with either a EQD The Depths or a GHE Stonefish.

i want to cuddle your volume pedal. tell me about that pic.

DADGBD wrote:

Mini Mini

SO NICE. just so nice. i love it. that rangemaster plate...ftw

I miss my KFK
that was a solid EQ

I got bored, I'd originally used a marker that kind of looked brown, so it looked like gizmo from Gremlins. I don't know why I decided to redo it in gold. hahaha

I love my KFK EQ