Esoterics // Superstition
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- Bassus Sanguinis
- Supporter

- Posts: 5075
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 7:32 am
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
Sure.

:::: Metal up Yöur Jazz! with FUZZIFERblack psychedelic doom ::::
Ugly Nora wrote:It's a sad day when Bassus Sanguinis becomes the voice of reason.
- alexa.
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Bosnian Pyramids
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
A quick test for everyone feeling curious enough about reality.
Notice: the movie is one big expression, interlinked, so if you plan on watching a part and saying: "I DON'T LIKE THAT THIS IS BULLSHIT"; don't watch it partially, watch it from start to end (part by part if you feel it's too much for you at once), listen to everything, don't judge, rather try to observe the world through that point of view. It will give you a better idea of what it is said, giving you understanding, then making you able to exclaim if you feel there is truth and logic in the statement, or you have reason not to believe it is a valid opinion. This could be a fun challenge to everyone priding themselves in their logic and scientific approach (etc.).
Enjoy the journey.
<3
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrAgb1-UKQ8[/youtube]
Notice: the movie is one big expression, interlinked, so if you plan on watching a part and saying: "I DON'T LIKE THAT THIS IS BULLSHIT"; don't watch it partially, watch it from start to end (part by part if you feel it's too much for you at once), listen to everything, don't judge, rather try to observe the world through that point of view. It will give you a better idea of what it is said, giving you understanding, then making you able to exclaim if you feel there is truth and logic in the statement, or you have reason not to believe it is a valid opinion. This could be a fun challenge to everyone priding themselves in their logic and scientific approach (etc.).
Enjoy the journey.
<3
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrAgb1-UKQ8[/youtube]

L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
- alexa.
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Bosnian Pyramids
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
bump? 


L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
- Chankgeez
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 42262
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
alexa. wrote:bump?![]()
I haven't been following this thread for awhile. I watched that yagé documentary you posted some time back. I thought it was interesting, but biased (everything's biased). It reeked too much of psychonautic tourism (although I agreed with what the shaman was saying). Maybe I'll watch this one you recently posted here?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
- alexa.
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Bosnian Pyramids
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
So nobody wanted to watch the movie?
It's interesting, and it's true food for thought.
This is interesting too (but much more superficial than the previous video I posted):
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QRqL09raIQ[/youtube]
Also, I've seen about 20 unexplainable flying objects, and I know how to differentiate between a falling star and a satellite.
It's interesting, and it's true food for thought.
This is interesting too (but much more superficial than the previous video I posted):
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QRqL09raIQ[/youtube]
Also, I've seen about 20 unexplainable flying objects, and I know how to differentiate between a falling star and a satellite.

L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
- rfurtkamp
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 5777
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
- Location: Idaho
- Contact:
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
Not much of a UFO guy, sorry, my interest in the wierd is pretty much confined to magick.
- devnulljp
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3989
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
This is better than all your homeopathically diluted deepakchoprawoo put together
Looks like they might have found the GODDAMN particle ...
4 sigma signals is getting pretty damn close
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
Looks like they might have found the GODDAMN particle ...
4 sigma signals is getting pretty damn close
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
- phantasmagorovich
- Supporter

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
devnulljp wrote:This is better than all your homeopathically diluted deepakchoprawoo put together
Looks like they might have found the GODDAMN particle ...![]()
4 sigma signals is getting pretty damn close
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
But what does this mean to me?
I mean, apart from the fact that I had to follow his links for someone to be kind enough to actually explain what 'the hicks' was, it is cool to find out what you can find out, but "the last piece of the standard model" and being so important, "because interacting with the Higgs is what gives all the other particles their mass", I just don't know what difference this makes to me. Would my life and my view of the world, my values and perception be changed by a review of the standard model? Or reinforced by its final approval beyond doubt? (Well, I'll just have to believe that 5 sigma IS beyond doubt, because, again, I have no idea what that means.)
See, there's something wrong there. I know some of what advanced science does can be explained in a way that is understandable. Why isn't that widely done? Why can a magazine like Wired (that's where the quotes are from btw) not explain this in a way that means something to me? Because it cannot be done? And if it cannot be done, what does it mean to me at all? I get the feeling that a lot of advanced science has encapsulated itself away from everyday life, no wonder people are looking for answers elsewhere.
I seldom stay awake at night and wonder how gravity works.
/// OWWL /// DAZZLE SHIPS
- alexa.
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Bosnian Pyramids
Re: Esoterics // Superstition

L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
- phantasmagorovich
- Supporter

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
Dude that's like 90 minutes. Much too long for an occasional ilf survey.
/// OWWL /// DAZZLE SHIPS
- Derelict78
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4844
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: Cadillac, MI
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
phantasmagorovich wrote:Why can a magazine like Wired (that's where the quotes are from btw) not explain this in a way that means something to me? Because it cannot be done? And if it cannot be done, what does it mean to me at all? I get the feeling that a lot of advanced science has encapsulated itself away from everyday life, no wonder people are looking for answers elsewhere.
I seldom stay awake at night and wonder how gravity works.
It might not effect your life now or ever BUT inventions of the future near and far could be based on this and could drastically change your life. Even proven False would change a lot of things.
Also I watched about 1/3-1/2 that vid and it was pretty cool, not mind blowing or anything but pretty cool. I rarely have and hour of straight free time. I may finish it latter.
aen wrote:Or I'll just use fuzz. Then Ill sound cool regardless.
Achtane wrote:Well, volcanoes are pretty fuckin' cool. Like I guess lava flows are doomy. Slow and still able to to melt your eardrums.
- alexa.
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Bosnian Pyramids
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
phantasmagorovich wrote:
Dude that's like 90 minutes. Much too long for an occasional ilf survey.
It's worth it. I wouldn't be so insisting if it wasn't.

L00PZ!
rfurtkamp wrote:Bastard stepchild of modern delay times/looping and a Lexicon Vortex would have me whipping out the credit card faster than a hooker at a coke convention.
- devnulljp
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3989
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
It means that we're right about physics -- that affects you, whether you know it or not (you're on the Internet right?). You live in a technological sociey, and the things you do every day -- Internet, cell phone, driving, watch TV, use a tube amp ... --phantasmagorovich wrote:But what does this mean to me?
It is. Scour through the pop sci section of your local bookstore (it's usually only a shelf or two, in place of the racks and racks of The Secret) or on Amazon. It can take a bit of work to really understand it though. That's why homeopathy and reiki and astrology and religion and all that other crap is so popular -- it's so easy.phantasmagorovich wrote:See, there's something wrong there. I know some of what advanced science does can be explained in a way that is understandable. Why isn't that widely done?
- phantasmagorovich
- Supporter

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
devnulljp wrote:It means that we're right about physics -- that affects you, whether you know it or not (you're on the Internet right?). You live in a technological sociey, and the things you do every day -- Internet, cell phone, driving, watch TV, use a tube amp ... --phantasmagorovich wrote:But what does this mean to me?
It is. Scour through the pop sci section of your local bookstore (it's usually only a shelf or two, in place of the racks and racks of The Secret) or on Amazon. It can take a bit of work to really understand it though. That's why homeopathy and reiki and astrology and religion and all that other crap is so popular -- it's so easy.phantasmagorovich wrote:See, there's something wrong there. I know some of what advanced science does can be explained in a way that is understandable. Why isn't that widely done?
Pt. 1: Is the discovery of this boson the reason for my tube amp to stop working? Well, then damn, undiscover that piece of hickup right away please. I'm not talking about elementary physics like what we learned in school, it's obvious that stuff can be applied in a way that matters to me. (Cellphone, internet, tube technology, microchips etc) But what does the discovery of a boson matter to me?
Pt. 2: Yup, you are right in a way. What I am asking is basically: Why can't popular science be as easy to understand as esoterics? Obviously conclusions made by deductive means are more complex than those you come to by inductive means. But why can't people explain it in inductive ways, so that I understand what it does matter to me.
/// OWWL /// DAZZLE SHIPS
- bigchiefbc
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Esoterics // Superstition
phantasmagorovich wrote:devnulljp wrote:It means that we're right about physics -- that affects you, whether you know it or not (you're on the Internet right?). You live in a technological sociey, and the things you do every day -- Internet, cell phone, driving, watch TV, use a tube amp ... --phantasmagorovich wrote:But what does this mean to me?
It is. Scour through the pop sci section of your local bookstore (it's usually only a shelf or two, in place of the racks and racks of The Secret) or on Amazon. It can take a bit of work to really understand it though. That's why homeopathy and reiki and astrology and religion and all that other crap is so popular -- it's so easy.phantasmagorovich wrote:See, there's something wrong there. I know some of what advanced science does can be explained in a way that is understandable. Why isn't that widely done?
Pt. 1: Is the discovery of this boson the reason for my tube amp to stop working? Well, then damn, undiscover that piece of hickup right away please. I'm not talking about elementary physics like what we learned in school, it's obvious that stuff can be applied in a way that matters to me. (Cellphone, internet, tube technology, microchips etc) But what does the discovery of a boson matter to me?
All of those technologies are based on physics that we just discovered in the last century. It wasn't elementary at the time, it was a new, relatively obscure discovery at the time. So who knows what awesome technology may come out of this discovery? The Higgs boson is what controls mass, and thus inertia/momentum. Maybe we'll eventually learn how to manipulate those things. I want my fucking inertial dampeners like in star trek.
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:srsly?last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
Fuck you.
