dubkitty wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 10:01 am
true, but that was about the most normal-guitar-looking headless ever produced. IIRC that was Steinberger’s compromise attempt to attract less radical guitarists. i can see how one of the Strandberg types and such could be comfortable, but how much would i have to adapt my technique (such as it is) to their various differences? what would that do to playing seated or standing? this is why i wouldn’t just order one on spec out of curiosity. it’s an extreme example of having to play before buying. i suppose one could order from someplace with 30-day returns.
I have had a bunch of headless guitars over the years. A year or two ago I bought a used Strandberg and immediately put it back up for sale, for 2 reasons.
I could not deal with the neck shape. It was not just the shape, but it was a little too thick.
The hardware seemed incredibly cheesy and there have been some stories about parts breaking on the FB Strandberg group.
I currently have an Ibanez 7 string headless and I like it. It's not a top of the line guitar, but it's solid and sounds good, better (to me) than the Strandberg. The Strandbergs look cooler, though.
I also have a Scott French headless from 20 some years ago, though I don't play it that often. It's great, but I had it built like a bass, with a big upper bout extension that makes it not as easy to play, IMO. I was younger and semi clueless and Scott was willing to build anything.
I have also had others, a MusicYo Steinberger with the GM shape, a Teuffel Tesla and a Synsonics. I thin there were others, but that's what I remember. I still have a Lotus Steinberger bass copy with the licensed hardware.
I don't have any problems adjusting to the lack of headstock. I don't find myself running into the headstock on a normal guitar.
I do think Klein had the coolest original headless shape.