Page 2 of 10
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:02 pm
by coldbrightsunlight
D.o.S. wrote:Should I go see it?
How did you feel about The Force Awakens?
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:15 pm
by D.o.S.
I was a fan.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:20 pm
by coldbrightsunlight
You like dis then

Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:17 pm
by jrfox92
I liked it.
I understand the criticism about two-dimensional characters and whatnot, but it's not like it matters that much (I won't say more to avoid the spoilers).
The planetary scenes are beautiful and probably the only reason I wish I saw it in 3D.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:35 pm
by D.o.S.
I mean complaining about two-dimensional characters in Star Wars is like complaining about Iambic pentameter in Shakespeare -- it's part and parcel of the experience.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:48 pm
by kaeth
I don't know what you guys are talking about. Tarkin was obviously three-dimensional.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:47 am
by Invisible Man
Yeah not sure how I feel about the Cushing resurrection. Why was it necessary?
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:18 am
by jrfox92
Invisible Man wrote:Yeah not sure how I feel about the Cushing resurrection. Why was it necessary?
Who else is supposed to take control of the Death Star?
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:57 am
by Invisible Man
No, I get that part--could have been a lackey stand-in, or an establishing shot from the back or something (extra menace). They made a guy who's been dead for over twenty years a significant supporting actor in a blockbuster movie. Strange choice.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:05 pm
by jrfox92
Invisible Man wrote:No, I get that part--could have been a lackey stand-in, or an establishing shot from the back or something (extra menace). They made a guy who's been dead for over twenty years a significant supporting actor in a blockbuster movie. Strange choice.
Probably because, outside of Vader and the Emperor, he's the main representative of the Empire that people recognize and expect to see. Also, because they need to spend that CGI money
somehow.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:37 pm
by rickenbastard
Invisible Man wrote:No, I get that part--could have been a lackey stand-in, or an establishing shot from the back or something (extra menace). They made a guy who's been dead for over twenty years a significant supporting actor in a blockbuster movie. Strange choice.
Same reason a hologram of a guy who's been dead 20 years headlines festivals and award shows...?
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:23 pm
by Invisible Man
Yeah. Also gross and terrifying.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:50 pm
by popvulture
D.o.S. wrote:I mean complaining about two-dimensional characters in Star Wars is like complaining about Iambic pentameter in Shakespeare -- it's part and parcel of the experience.
This.
I've never understood why people seem to demand some kind of rich character experience from Star Wars... when has that ever happened? It's just fun.
Anyway, going tonight. Stoked.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:11 pm
by MechaGodzilla
monkeydancer wrote:Going tomorrow morning. Psyched for Donnie Yen in star wars and cautiously optimistic in general.
As soon as I heard Ip Man was in Star Wars I was on board, yep, this is gonna be good. And it is good.
Re: Rogue One (no spoilers)
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:44 am
by SteveAlysis
Going with my daughter tomorrow morning. Heard it was pretty good