Page 2 of 9
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:19 am
by echorec
This reminds me of when breweries get together to mash up a special combination batch of extra hoppy, raspberry imperial ale. No one knows what they're drinking.

Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:44 am
by Eivind August
echorec wrote:This reminds me of when breweries get together to mash up a special combination batch of extra hoppy, raspberry imperial ale. No one knows what they're drinking.[/img]
Kool-Aid?
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:01 am
by JonnyAngle
Sounds sick. I'm assuming this will be priced closer to the gravitas for "normal ones".
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:03 am
by ProCarsteNation
echorec wrote: No one knows what they're drinking.

I think it says what they're drinking right on the tin

Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:11 am
by D.o.S.
Eivind August wrote:echorec wrote:This reminds me of when breweries get together to mash up a special combination batch of extra hoppy, raspberry imperial ale. No one knows what they're drinking.
Kool-Aid?
The marketing is kind of adorable, though, and I'm a big fan of how the pedal art is really reminiscent of those hideous 90's "fractal art" drugs (or maths) books.

Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:41 am
by echorec
ProCarsteNation wrote:echorec wrote: No one knows what they're drinking.
I think it says what they're drinking right on the tin

All you know is that Joel Korte is involved. Ayahuasca is just a generic word for magic. No one lining up to drool over this offering knows what kind of magic this is though---is it dark magic or light magic? Other than Joel, what other wizards had their hands near the cauldron? ---Was there a cauldron at all? Could it have been conceived through the use of both light and dark magic, thus making it far more dynamic, but dangerously unstable?
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:43 am
by D.o.S.
echorec wrote: Ayahuasca is just a generic word for magic.
Not correct:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayahuasca
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:21 am
by UglyCasanova
A few of my friends go to ayahuasca ceremonies twice a year. I'd really like to go some time. Seems like the kind of trip that I'd like, at least more than LSD and Shrooms. More like guidance than a brick to the face.
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:33 am
by D.o.S.
Eivind August wrote:More like guidance than a brick to the face.
comparable amount of vomiting, though, from what I understand.
(also how you like that name change? xD)
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:49 am
by UglyCasanova
I do, I do.
Vomiting is more of a chemical reaction to whatever you've stuffed in your face that day rather than the drug itself. Cured meats for example makes for projectile vomiting.
Sometimes, nerdy chemist friends are useful.

Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:56 am
by JonnyAngle
http://abracadabraaudio.com/about/
So after reading this, it sounds like it might not be available in the CBA product line. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:11 pm
by popvulture
$450, but I imagine well worth it if you ever wanna flip... only 10 made? Dweebs started splooging before the pedal was even announced. Psychic GAS splooge.
Anyway, cool ped. Not for me, but stoked to see future releases.
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:36 pm
by echorec

It's used for spiritual rituals, hence my sardonic reference to it being magical.
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:04 pm
by D.o.S.
Might be wise to remember that 'sardonic' does not translate through text without context, and your marketing (if you like) wasn't delivering it -- although yours is leagues ahead of the website's "we're not telling you who's involved (but it's the Chase Bliss folks) now give us your money" stuff.
Not that it makes much difference one way or the other, though.
Re: Ayahuasca
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:14 pm
by echorec
D.o.S. wrote:Might be wise to remember that 'sardonic' does not translate through text without context, and your marketing (if you like) wasn't delivering it -- although yours is leagues ahead of the website's "we're not telling you who's involved (but it's the Chase Bliss folks) now give us your money" stuff.
Not that it makes much difference one way or the other, though.
Without context? I also referenced wizards and cauldrons, you friggin' doink.
