ilovefuzz.com

To be perfectly honest I think thousands of years of recorded history would show that this is precisely the sort of "Christian" activity that "Christians" always get up to in the name of, you guessed it, "Christianity." At a certain point you can fairly safely call a spade a spade, and I'd say once you've hit the millennia mark of doing the same shit over and over and over again you qualify.

Its obviously because serving pasta to a gay couple is the same thing as following them home and engaging in homosexual sex with them. Everyone knows this.

D.o.S. wrote:To be perfectly honest I think thousands of years of recorded history would show that this is precisely the sort of "Christian" activity that "Christians" always get up to in the name of, you guessed it, "Christianity." At a certain point you can fairly safely call a spade a spade, and I'd say once you've hit the millennia mark of doing the same shit over and over and over again you qualify.

True.....doesn't make it less disappointing......but true.

HighDeaf1080p wrote:Its obviously because serving pasta to a gay couple is the same thing as following them home and engaging in homosexual sex with them.

I go to church with enough people that think this way....to really sometimes hate going to church.

or worse, they come to your house for the sexings!

Fun things I've seen on the internet about this:
https://twitter.com/JohnFugelsang/statu ... 05?lang=en

The poorest state w/highest unemployment, most obesity and worst education just passed a law to protect themselves from gays.

I think what we're really talking about here is gay pasta.

I think the problem is when everyone got together and collectively agreed that anal sex is gross. That's what really screwed the gays.

Everyone who missed the meeting didn't get to vote...and they didn't publicize the time and place very well.

Oooooooh, bad direction.

I am trying to qualify in my mind how cringeworthy that statement should be.

Yeah, rough stuff—let's keep it together y'all.

You can hide behind religious dogma, doctrine, any type of morals, sanctity of the family unit, blah blah blah. What this all boils down to is those people who can't get past what they imagine gays do in the bedroom that they find so icky.

so would you say It's a war on butt stuff, but stuff?

I think its more along the lines of "If I rally against the gays, none of my community members will ever suspect that me and Laura also do butt stuff in OUR bedroom!" Smoke and mirrors...smoke and mirrors.

D.o.S. wrote:I mean that's a gross oversimplification, right, because society as a human concept has always been about the rights of the few at the expense of others.

I also don't think questions of ideological consistency are really 'attacks', either, though.

Please explain to me the how his snide comments that have nothing to do with this thread are questions about my ideology? I can believe multiple things and that's my right. It's also my right to say I don't have to tolerate assholes. He clearly was only posting to be a prick. No other reason.

Because I'm against abortion I'm automatically lumped into some preconceived classification of your idea of the typical Christian? That's absurd and has no basis.

id appreciate it if I was allows to believe what I want and you believe what you want. I'm not going to constantly argue pointless arguments with people who view the world different than me. Especially on my religious beliefs.

I mean "Intolerance is disgusting" would seem to be at odds with the logical/legal outcomes of your positions on abortion, for one thing.