Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 10:59 am
Omega Red?
Omega Red?
Page 2 of 3
Omega Red?
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:32 pm
i wish it'd be a trilogy - that'd be awesome. and i agree that he shouldn't be able to be defeated in a couple hours. not sure if i'd want the x-force guys added though... i love them, but it's already a lot of characters.Invisible Man wrote:I'm so excited for this movie, but the trailer leaves a lot to be desired. Also makes me wish that this were a trilogy--Apocalypse isn't someone they can introduce, fight, and defeat in two hours. At least not in a way that will be cool. I mean we're dealing with time travel, mind control, god-like powers, super strength, &c all as both powers and plot devices, and that's all gonna happen in a massive ensemble cast with tons of CGI (which didn't look super great to me here, by the way)? Sounds like a recipe for a shitty movie.
This could have been stretched out to include Bishop, Cable, tie into another franchise (X Factor), on and on and on. FOX needs to sell the X-Men rights to Marvel after this movie so we can really get the ball rolling. Fantastic Four appears to be done after three bad, underperforming movies...could be so cool to watch the endless cross-pollination of this stuff.
Say what you will--I know not all of these are of high quality. But I don't care. I'll watch them all until I die. It's fun, and they're great popcorn flicks.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:33 pm
he never used swords though, did he? swords make me think of deadpool and he was already in that pretty terrible flick...Invisible Man wrote:
Omega Red?
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:38 pm
Yes! As soon as I saw the image I said, "Omega Red!" Not sure why I couldn't remember that, thanks.Invisible Man wrote:
Omega Red?
No he didn't. Hence my, "I think." I realized thinking more in the day that it was the tentacle things only and no swords.space6oy wrote:he never used swords though, did he? swords make me think of deadpool and he was already in that pretty terrible flick...Invisible Man wrote:Omega Red?
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:09 pm
1) I agree with everything Invisble Man said. Pretty much sums up my earlier statement about the Age of Apoc thing.
2) Bishop rules.
3) Cable rules.
4) Omega Red fucking rules. Cannot believe they haven't put him in a movie yet.
5) Omega Red vs Winter Soldier would be rad. My 2c.
2) Bishop rules.
3) Cable rules.
4) Omega Red fucking rules. Cannot believe they haven't put him in a movie yet.
5) Omega Red vs Winter Soldier would be rad. My 2c.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:35 am
Can you imagine how cool all of this would be? I mean, it's not like Marvel is thinking "welp, those character are too obscure." Guardians of the Galaxy just made fourteen billion dollars last year, and I'd never even seen an issue of that mag. Even lame-ass Ant-Man turned out pretty cool.
Now the question becomes: who would play Cable or Bishop? Omega Red is easier to cast. And wow! Winter Soldier/Omega Red would be killer.
Now the question becomes: who would play Cable or Bishop? Omega Red is easier to cast. And wow! Winter Soldier/Omega Red would be killer.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 7:45 am
Bishop: Chad Coleman
Cable: Was gonna say Mickey Rourke, but he's not looking so hot these days.
Cable: Was gonna say Mickey Rourke, but he's not looking so hot these days.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:08 am
Both would be very cool...but wasn't Mickey Rourke already in a Marvel property (Whiplash in Iron Man 2)? I know that doesn't always stop people...eventually, everyone will be in Marvel movies, because no others movies will be made. Apparently Cate Blanchett has been tapped to play Hela in the next Thor movie.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:05 am
Ah fuck, yeah he was.
He was good in that too, I dunno why I didn't remember that.
Mel Gibson as Ghostrider.
Marlon Brando's corpse as Galactus.
Will Ferrell as Stan Lee doing Stan Lee's cameo as someone else.
Also, I'm totally down to be in some kind of an extended Thor universe series.
Am bald, have beard=total Asgardian.
He was good in that too, I dunno why I didn't remember that.
Mel Gibson as Ghostrider.
Marlon Brando's corpse as Galactus.
Will Ferrell as Stan Lee doing Stan Lee's cameo as someone else.
Also, I'm totally down to be in some kind of an extended Thor universe series.
Am bald, have beard=total Asgardian.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:25 am
There already was a Bishop...if you could call it that. I barely remember him. Apparently Jubilee has been in the movies like 3 times, yet I have never noticed.
Rourke would prob be cool for Cable; Whiplash or no. Chris Evans played Captain America and the Human Torch
Rourke would prob be cool for Cable; Whiplash or no. Chris Evans played Captain America and the Human Torch
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:19 pm
Cable: Ron PearlmanIommic Pope wrote:Bishop: Chad Coleman
Cable: Was gonna say Mickey Rourke, but he's not looking so hot these days.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:40 pm
Nailed itspace6oy wrote:Cable: Ron Pearlman
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 2:57 pm
Noooo! That'd be terrible.
Forgot about this guy. Too small a role...
Forgot about this guy. Too small a role...
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:35 pm
This. Just a whole movie of this.Iommic Pope wrote:Will Ferrell as Stan Lee doing Stan Lee's cameo as someone else.
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:49 pm
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAP: the Dwarfcraft vocalizer pedal.aen wrote:BWAAAAAAAAAAAAP
Marvel isn't making the X-Men movies, it's Fox.Invisible Man wrote:Can you imagine how cool all of this would be? I mean, it's not like Marvel is thinking "welp, those character are too obscure."