Totally off-topic, though maybe not quite:
http://pitchfork.com/news/61444-powell- ... interview/That's actually the follow-up story, what came before shouldn't be further athan a few clicks away.
That kinda tells me Steve doesn't seem like the type of guy who'd give a shit about lending his album art to some small time pedal builder. I mean, if he let some random dude remix parts of his music into something he hates with a passion, it kinda almost seems silly for anyone else to get worked up about it

I actually don't take intellectual property lightly, not at all. But I sometimes find it hard to see the difference between sticking a rolling stones 'tongue and lips' logo on your bike or whatever, and using rather obscure album art for an even more obscure effects pedal :idk Would you have to peel off the sticker if you were to sell the bike in order to not rip off John Pache or the Stones?

I'd be fucking thrilled if anyone want to give my album free publicity by putting the cover art on a fuzz pedal. Especially if it's a rad fuzz pedal

I'm actually not taking the piss here, I'm often genuinly confused about where the line is. Making this an interesting topic for me, but maybe not so much for others to for others

Whatever. Pedals, beer, boobies. Peace.