ilovefuzz.com

Bassus Sanguinis wrote:

colin wrote:It's simultaneously weird, funny and kind of sad.

...and it's sort of attention whore-ish flirting with animal cruelty or something, idk

That. He's using his dead cat to gain attention for himself and his art. I can only imagine what the guy did to the cat while it was alive.

I'm not sure how it can be animal cruelty if the cat was already dead. While it may seem attention whore-ish, it IS a good use of an animal corpse. Most people would just bury their cat or something.

All in all, I don't think it's something worth getting all uppity and judgmental about.

behndy wrote:oh my.

that shit IS funny... but makes me sad too? like i imagine doing that to a pet i loved?

but yeah. awesomely weird.

yeah, it's kind of horrible and awesome at the same time. b

I AM VERY OFFENDED RIGHT NOW.

naw. it's his pet. if it doesn't freak him out and he's not hurting it, have at it.

odd though.

It had to be done, and I had to be the one to do it:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ2L-kfyuz8[/youtube]

snipelfritz wrote:I'm not sure how it can be animal cruelty if the cat was already dead. While it may seem attention whore-ish, it IS a good use of an animal corpse. Most people would just bury their cat or something.

All in all, I don't think it's something worth getting all uppity and judgmental about.

um... I didn't say it was animal cruelty. I said it was flirting with animal cruelty to get some attention.

And corpses SHOULD be put to good use. For food, clothing, and tools, instruments. Decorating a light weight aircraft with animal corpse - well, it's use alright, just not very useful or particularly needed for that aircraft. Is it?

Anyway... whatever.This can be argued for an eternity if somebody feels like that. Discussion, attention, publicity. I just don't feel like paying much attention.

snipelfritz wrote:I'm not sure how it can be animal cruelty if the cat was already dead. While it may seem attention whore-ish, it IS a good use of an animal corpse. Most people would just bury their cat or something.

All in all, I don't think it's something worth getting all uppity and judgmental about.

um... I didn't say it was animal cruelty. I said it was flirting with animal cruelty to get some attention.

And corpses SHOULD be put to good use. For food, clothing, and tools, instruments. Decorating a light weight aircraft with animal corpse - well, it's use alright, just not very useful or particularly needed for that aircraft. Is it?

Anyway... whatever.This can be argued for an eternity if somebody feels like that. Discussion, attention, publicity. I just don't feel like paying much attention.

Bassus Sanguinis wrote:

snipelfritz wrote:I'm not sure how it can be animal cruelty if the cat was already dead. While it may seem attention whore-ish, it IS a good use of an animal corpse. Most people would just bury their cat or something.

All in all, I don't think it's something worth getting all uppity and judgmental about.

um... I didn't say it was animal cruelty. I said it was flirting with animal cruelty to get some attention.

And corpses SHOULD be put to good use. For food, clothing, and tools, instruments. Decorating a light weight aircraft with animal corpse - well, it's use alright, just not very useful or particularly needed for that aircraft. Is it?

Anyway... whatever.This can be argued for an eternity if somebody feels like that. Discussion, attention, publicity. I just don't feel like paying much attention.

I suppose I can't argue with that. Priorities should be considered.