Page 2 of 4
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:09 pm
by plhogan
Uncircumcised dicks are gross.
And female circumsion doesnt exist, it's just a bullshit euphemism for genital mutilation.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:12 pm
by theactionindex
plhogan wrote:Uncircumcised dicks are gross.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:14 pm
by McSpunckle
theactionindex wrote:plhogan wrote:Uncircumcised dicks are gross.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:29 pm
by TroySanders
maz91379 wrote:You allz just be angry cause you can't be ballooned.
EW
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:19 pm
by dubkitty
see, to go all SPACERITUAL on you, i really don't care about other peoples' dicks. i don't care what they do with them, how they decorate them, what kind of accessories they get for them, whether they have them chopped or channelled or somebody goes all Damien Hirst on them. i just don't care. if your parents had your weenie whacked as a matter of some cultural significance or pseudo-significance, complain to them. or not as your tastes may require. hell, sue them if you like. but if you believe as a matter of principle that government should stay out of peoples' bedrooms, it seems to follow that government doesn't belong in peoples' underwear in general. just how much do you want the government regulating what you can and can't do with a penis? hm?
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:40 pm
by devnulljp
dubkitty wrote:Islam and Judaism both require circumcision..
See? It's not just not-bacon they have in common!
"We don't have foreskins, you don't have foreskins, let's all not have foreskins together ... "[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UO6YlkYNJQ[/youtube]
See what you can come up with when you let bunch of illiterate inbred bronze-age goatherders define your culture. Woopee!
plhogan wrote:Uncircumcised dicks are gross.
All dicks are gross. Don't even start on balls
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:44 pm
by devnulljp
futuresailors wrote:Q: How can you tell if you are in a gay church?
A: Only half the congregation are kneeling!!
Must. Not. Make. Catholic. Joke...
(Or post the
Louis CK/Catholic Church video 
)
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:52 pm
by Doodahman1969
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 7:58 pm
by McSpunckle
Well, you are technically mutilating the kid.
That said, one of my cousins has a 5 year old that she didn't have circumcised, and his dick got infected. Sooooooo. There is a definite hygienic argument to be made, and because of that, I'd definitely be against a ban. It's up to the parents.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 8:02 pm
by Doodahman1969
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 8:31 pm
by SPACERITUAL
I kinda thought this was going to be a guide to getting dick in san fran. This is that bullshit.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 8:33 pm
by plhogan
Circumcision absolutely is more sanitary and protects against a wide array of infections and diseases. It's not surprising that the only people who argue against it aren't cut themselves.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 8:36 pm
by TroySanders
SPACERITUAL wrote:I kinda thought this was going to be a guide to getting dick in san fran. This is tha bullshit.
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 8:49 pm
by Christopher
plhogan wrote:Circumcision absolutely is more sanitary and protects against a wide array of infections and diseases. It's not surprising that the only people who argue against it aren't cut themselves.
don't forget how it looks more appealing and allegedly it desensitizes the tip so you can last longer
I think it's the whole fallacy of natural=better which has already been thoroughly disproven by makeup and mdma
Re: HEY ILF LETS TALK ABOUT DICKS and SAN FRAN
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 9:27 pm
by devnulljp
plhogan wrote:Circumcision absolutely is more sanitary and protects against a wide array of infections and diseases. It's not surprising that the only people who argue against it aren't cut themselves.
Way to miss the point. What other part of a child's body are you allowed to cut off? You want to do it to yourself fine. You want to get a pierced scrotum, fine. You want to change the shape of your nose, fine.
You shouldn't do
anything irreversible to a child. You can't tattoo a kid. I don't think you should pierce kids' ears either. Let them make up their minds when they're old enough. Don't go hacking bits off their body you can't stick em back on later. As for hygiene ... we invented soap a long time ago
If it wasn't religious-based, you'd never be allowed to do it.
