warwick.hoy wrote:McSpunckle wrote:If the pedal is always on, you don't need a buffer at all.
The high output impedance of passive guitars allow the small capacitance in a shielded cable to affect your high end. Basically, a buffer keeps your signal at the same voltage, but adds current to it, and the output of any pedal will actually going to be higher voltage and current (depending on your volume settings on the pedal), so it literally doesn't matter if you use a buffer.
If the input impedance of that pedal is actually causing problems, and in my experience that effect is grossly over-hyped, then a buffer in front might help.
Referring to the Klon Clone?
I was referring to this post:
Achtane wrote:So just connect this to one of your always-on pedals, like a booster or something, and you'll be good to go? It would be best to position it mid-way or at the end of your chain then, right?
My basic feelings on buffers is that they shouldn't be built into the pedal so you have to always have them on. They can certainly help a lot, but as anyone that's ever stacked a bunch of Boss/Ibanez pedals together can tell you, it's not a great idea to have them in everything. The cables you add between pedals aren't that significant. It's that extra long cable you have to use after your pedals that causes problems (Unless you have a huge pedalboard), so it's really just important to get a buffer in before that if you wanna save some high end.
The talk of good/bad buffers is a bit misguided. The Klon buffer is the same, basically, as any other IC buffer, except it uses a different form of biasing and a fixed volume control on the output.
Since this is the Talkbass thread, if you have an active bass, you basically have a buffered bass. You know how everyone's always asking "How well does this work with active basses?"? Yup. It'd be just the same putting that effect after a buffer.