Page 904 of 2348
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:37 pm
by new05002
I run a lot of amps with the treble down even Matamp based designs. Fuzz pedals or distortion pedals in front of it already generate harmonics in the upper mid range that do not need to be amplified!
Just got back from a Maine weekend with my dad. We did not have any heat for 2 nights which was rough to say the least when sleeping. We did get the stove installed on the third day so that helped
sundown at the property.
Worked out this morning, super rough coming off a deload and the Maine weekend (food bonanzaaaaaaa)
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:50 pm
by conky
^ Fuck yeah, wood burning stoves rule!
pelliott wrote:I got my response from Brutal Panda. They actually offered me a replacement when they repress it. No word about them speeding it up intentionally but they asked if it appeared warped.
Conky, I'd recommend you try to reach out to them again. Same goes to everyone, just try shooting an e-mail saying hey whats gives
Nah, I'm fucking done with Brutal Panda. If Christian gets some copies of the repress I'll buy it off of him instead.
Wes Mantooth wrote:What's the general consensus on the BAT Revelations? I'm thinking about picking up a Super Bass in the future.
THEY FUCKING RULE!!! I have both, the Superlead and Superbass. Love them both and they are both really similar but the Superlead a little bit more compressed than the Superbass. The Superlead has a little bit more bite in the top end too. Mostly in more extreme settings though. Both can sound exactly the same if you dial it in right. Can't go wrong with a Revelation, especially if you're gonna use it to boost an already dirty amp or stack it with more pedals.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:00 pm
by pelliott
Fair.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:08 pm
by D-Day
whiskey_face wrote:just ask him "hows mah dick taste?" that should be the game winning headshot
Ha! She's leaving him alone.
D.o.S. wrote:Also, gonna voice an unpopular opinion and say three months is long enough for someone to be out of a relationship and therefore fair game. But I'm not the biggest proponent of monogamous, committed relationships, so my take is probably skewed.
I'm not opposed to her dating or getting out there at all. I certainly have been! What I am opposed to is my main friend who comes to my house every day asking her out and 'forgetting' to tell me for three consecutive days and then talking corny bullshit when I ask him what's the deal. He has ex girlfriends. Some are gorgeous. But I do fine and get my own women from outside of the pool of my friends' exes. He's capable of the same so I have no idea why he sought out my ex.
Maybe I'm weird because I'm from Boise. It's a much larger town now but when I was young it was damn near literally impossible to hook up with a chick that some dude I knew hadn't already fucked. It grossed me out quite frankly. So when I moved to a city more than ten times the size I said never again. And I haven't because there's just no need. I don't need to be where my friends have been and I certainly don't wish to be any agent of hurt even if it's unintentional. I certainly don't want a virgin or anything (but strangely my last two LTR's were) I'd just rather not know the last guy(s) personally.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:23 pm
by D-Day
Apparently I like the word certainly this morning.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:01 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
D-Day wrote:Apparently I like the word certainly this morning.
You certainly do.

Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:16 pm
by Harry_Manback
D-Day wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Maybe I'm weird because I'm from Boise. It's a much larger town now but when I was young it was damn near literally impossible to hook up with a chick that some dude I knew hadn't already fucked. It grossed me out quite frankly. So when I moved to a city more than ten times the size I said never again. And I haven't because there's just no need. I don't need to be where my friends have been and I certainly don't wish to be any agent of hurt even if it's unintentional. I certainly don't want a virgin or anything (but strangely my last two LTR's were) I'd just rather not know the last guy(s) personally.
Funny story - shortly after I graduated high school (decades ago), I found myself at party with my first serious girlfriend, passing the bong with a bunch of my buddies. I looked around the room and realized this trick had slept with 5 different dudes in the same room. Not cool. But her mom was a dealer and gave us free grass, plus I was gettin' laid on the regular so I milked that situation for longer than I should have.
I found my wife in Seattle, far outside my circle of friends. I was not her first, but at least I know none of my buddies have tapped it.
TMI? Certainly.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:50 pm
by humancertainty
I agree that three months is fair game, although Darren appears to agree, too.
Not the biggest believer in monogamy of committed relationships, either.
Not cool to be chasing your friend's ex, though. At the very least, not for a long time. I've hooked up with friend's exes but it was a long time after the fact. Except once, but I fucked up.
I don't judge a girl by her sexual past. Even if she has been with friends of mine before. Don't care how many people she has slept with. I take the situation for what it is and leave it at that.
Don't want to lecture or seem PC as I am most certainly not into either, but feel obligated to say that referring to women with derogatory terms based on their promiscuity is a shitty thing to do. Especially when men aren't held to the same standards.
Off the soapbox now. Carry on.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:56 pm
by D.o.S.
Doom Room: Not fans of the Eskimo Brother- and Sisterhood.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:19 pm
by AngryGoldfish
humancertainty wrote:I agree that three months is fair game, although Darren appears to agree, too.
Not the biggest believer in monogamy of committed relationships, either.
Not cool to be chasing your friend's ex, though. At the very least, not for a long time. I've hooked up with friend's exes but it was a long time after the fact. Except once, but I fucked up.
I don't judge a girl by her sexual past. Even if she has been with friends of mine before. Don't care how many people she has slept with. I take the situation for what it is and leave it at that.
Don't want to lecture or seem PC as I am most certainly not into either, but feel obligated to say that referring to women with derogatory terms based on their promiscuity is a shitty thing to do. Especially when men aren't held to the same standards.
Off the soapbox now. Carry on.
The discussion of "slut shaming", as horrible as that word is, is going round at the moment. People are starting to stand up for people's sexual decisions, which is great. I don't agree with hurting others as part of your habits—I'm very sensitive to these things and it even hurts when I see made up infidelity on TV—but I recognize that not a lot of others see a problem with sleeping around carefree. That's their opinion; I have mine. I don't mind people doing whatever they want as long as it doesn't affect others. Then again, I don't like seeing people hurt themselves through sexual promiscuity, but that's their choice to make and I shouldn't judge them or call them names. Of course, no one here is doing that, but you know what I mean. I prefer if people led monogamous lives, both men and women, young and old, but I shouldn't push my agenda on others, so I don't. Explaining
my lifestyle is not forcing others to concede and follow. I'm just expressing myself like I would if I said I prefer the Nolan Batman movies to the 1980's ones. I'm not saying the 80's films were bad, just that I prefer the modern-day ones.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:36 pm
by Wes Mantooth
conky wrote:
Wes Mantooth wrote:What's the general consensus on the BAT Revelations? I'm thinking about picking up a Super Bass in the future.
THEY FUCKING RULE!!! I have both, the Superlead and Superbass. Love them both and they are both really similar but the Superlead a little bit more compressed than the Superbass. The Superlead has a little bit more bite in the top end too. Mostly in more extreme settings though. Both can sound exactly the same if you dial it in right. Can't go wrong with a Revelation, especially if you're gonna use it to boost an already dirty amp or stack it with more pedals.
Hmm maybe a Super Lead would be better, I already have two fuzzes going that bring plenty of bass and low mids to the mix. I need some bite, if I didn't just find out my phone is now just an expensive iPod, I'd be buying one
But it just means some more waiting and I have plenty of gear to keep me company. With all of your guys' praise I'm pretty sure a spot on the board is saved for a Revelation. Maybe add a Fuck OD in that loop as well down the line

Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:45 pm
by D.o.S.
AngryGoldfish wrote:humancertainty wrote:I agree that three months is fair game, although Darren appears to agree, too.
Not the biggest believer in monogamy of committed relationships, either.
Not cool to be chasing your friend's ex, though. At the very least, not for a long time. I've hooked up with friend's exes but it was a long time after the fact. Except once, but I fucked up.
I don't judge a girl by her sexual past. Even if she has been with friends of mine before. Don't care how many people she has slept with. I take the situation for what it is and leave it at that.
Don't want to lecture or seem PC as I am most certainly not into either, but feel obligated to say that referring to women with derogatory terms based on their promiscuity is a shitty thing to do. Especially when men aren't held to the same standards.
Off the soapbox now. Carry on.
The discussion of "slut shaming", as horrible as that word is, is going round at the moment. People are starting to stand up for people's sexual decisions, which is great. I don't agree with hurting others as part of your habits—I'm very sensitive to these things and it even hurts when I see made up infidelity on TV—but I recognize that not a lot of others see a problem with sleeping around carefree. That's their opinion; I have mine. I don't mind people doing whatever they want as long as it doesn't affect others. Then again, I don't like seeing people hurt themselves through sexual promiscuity, but that's their choice to make and I shouldn't judge them or call them names. Of course, no one here is doing that, but you know what I mean. I prefer if people led monogamous lives, both men and women, young and old, but I shouldn't push my agenda on others, so I don't. Explaining
my lifestyle is not forcing others to concede and follow. I'm just expressing myself like I would if I said I prefer the Nolan Batman movies to the 1980's ones. I'm not saying the 80's films were bad, just that I prefer the modern-day ones.
Whore.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:47 pm
by AngryGoldfish
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:54 pm
by D.o.S.
It's like magic, but more magical.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:01 pm
by pelliott
oh hell I want that sandwich