ilovefuzz.com

That might make sense if I was the only one who took issue with your post. Instead it was five or six posters in a row.

Is it possible that you maybe didn't communicate the point you were trying to when you blundered into the conversation?

Oh, no, of course not. It must be me.

You did in fact show us your ass a lot during ILF EU.

I mean he has clearly established he’s the civil, polite and respectful poster here. Your buttocks were his exhibit A, DoS.

D.o.S. wrote:That might make sense if I was the only one who took issue with your post. Instead it was five or six posters in a row.

Is it possible that you maybe didn't communicate the point you were trying to when you blundered into the conversation?

echorec wrote:Excuse me, I'm not sure what your positions is---but fuck that I'd rather manufacture a controversy, rather than ask a fucking question.

Disarm D'arcy wrote:I mean he has clearly established he’s the civil, polite and respectful poster here. Your buttocks were his exhibit A, DoS.

And I’ve studied civil procedure. I know evidence when I see it.

echorec wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:That might make sense if I was the only one who took issue with your post. Instead it was five or six posters in a row.

Is it possible that you maybe didn't communicate the point you were trying to when you blundered into the conversation?

echorec wrote:Excuse me, I'm not sure what your positions is---but fuck that I'd rather manufacture a controversy, rather than ask a fucking question.

Here's a question: What controversy am I manufacturing? What exactly have I done except touch a nerve by referencing your incessant posting about gear sales?

coldbrightsunlight wrote:Armchair psychology/10

IM I think in the general sense about internet communications your post is spot on however as dos is saying nobody is necessarily attacking anyone's character in general, rather going after a particular point they disagreed with. Maybe could have been done more diplomatically but I'm not sure I believe this represents part of a larger pattern of behavior on this forum specifically

I definitely see this as a pattern here and elsewhere. But it looks like negotiations have broken down either way, as echorec hasn't taken well to prodding and antagonism. So there goes civil discourse about real shit...all I meant is that maybe we should grade the force of our rhetoric a bit so that we're not using the same strategies to bullshit about spin chips as we are to talk about rape.

I want to hear more about how I'm an awful sjw thirsty for a target.

How many pages before this thread gets a title to the new focus?

Like that?

I almost felt sorry for you in your GearBlog2000 debacle, but you’ve been flaming out ever since, and you clearly brought your residual bad feelings with you to this thread.

Your original comment was maybe just poorly articulated but it sounded like rape apologist nonsense. Digging in your heels with a legal definition of rape in a thread about rape culture is completely tone deaf. The legal system is a huge part of “rape culture” and how it is sustained.

You’ve been simultaneously playing the victim and throwing a vicious pottymouth tantrum. You seem to think you’ve got some moral high ground but you’ve been acting like a ranting ass in this thread. You’ve got your fedora all wrapped up in a bunch with your panties.

D.o.S. wrote:That might make sense if I was the only one who took issue with your post. Instead it was five or six posters in a row.

HIVEMIND

D.o.S. wrote:Here's a question: What controversy am I manufacturing? What exactly have I done except touch a nerve by referencing your incessant posting about gear sales?

I'm more irritated about you being a self-congratulating imposter more than anything. You're like the Gallagher of message board posters. You're not even a court jester, you're a broken wind-up doll. If people want to know why the board is so rigid and stagnant, then they need to look no further than our resident box of mothballs, Mr. Pinkass.

I'm almost at half mast. Keep going.