ilovefuzz.com

I'd be down for the UK or Sweden, tbqh.

Maybe Sweden so I don't have to split too much of my breaux time with the lady friend and you guys?

Can't your lady friend or you move across the pond? Because it seems like a very inconvenient way to organize a relationship?

I'd be so down for the UK or Sweden. But, I just bought a house, so travelling is very much so not in the picture for awhile

I think the plan is that I'm moving to the UK next spring/summer anyway, but that's contingent on some factors (which don't include the lady friend, tbh. even though she's awesome despite her questionable taste in dudes).

Sweden would be awesome too!

And dude, where?

You're willing to trade a pick up truck, country music and bacon grease for some royal overlords. Are you silly?

^details!

monkeydancer wrote:Sweden would be awesome too!

And dude, where?

London-ish? it's sort of nebulous at the moment for a handful of reasons and it won't be until after April/Roadburn anyway (esp. since it'd be a waste of a dual citizenship to not leave before Trump physically closes the borders).

OH MY GAWD YOU LIKE FREEDOM SO LITTLE YOU'RE A BREXITER

Hey for all its faults brexit is all about freedom (it gave me physical pain to type this)

Yay London, fun place to be

monkeydancer wrote:Hey for all its faults brexit is all about freedom (it gave me physical pain to type this)

Yay London, fun place to be

You don't believe that really MD.

It's about a class of folks disappointed with their futures, yearning after a past that never really existed finding a convenient scapegoat.

Exactly. And also French representatives idolizing the German and their policies tailored for the the ageing middle class that bought herself retirement by pensions by capitalization. The balance of the EU has been compromised since 2007. The independence of the central bank is a mistake, monetary policies are political and their rigidity that is organized at a constitutional (Treaty) level is absolutely inefficient. Furthermore, the pressure put on states to limit public spendings and delegating more and more more public services to private companies prevents the spendy socialist mediterraneans to invest heavily in a future that now seems compromised. Our population is growing, we need solutions for everything. Raising sea levels, energy that isn't nuclear (we have the technologies but no money to actually use them), we need more and more schools to educate the soon to be youngest people in the old Europe, more and more researchers and university teachers. And all of these will get some more budget cuts this year. Because the Commission will look at our budget, tell us that we are lazy and spendy and all the socialized shit costs too much, guys just have more private insurances please yada yada yada, and the little boy that is supposed to be a president will take a deep voice in a televised intervention to explain that we're gonna have to pull it off with more blood and sweat because we cut more spendings last year but it's not enough and for some yet unidentified reason the state's revenue gets shittier with every budget cuts which so totally weird so please die earlier and in good health so we can save our finances.

We need debt, because it's how wealthy nations are built.

Just don't park improperly, you silly. Cycle places, it's free and no one gives you shit for parking like an idiot.

goroth wrote:

monkeydancer wrote:Hey for all its faults brexit is all about freedom (it gave me physical pain to type this)

Yay London, fun place to be

You don't believe that really MD.

It's about a class of folks disappointed with their futures, yearning after a past that never really existed finding a convenient scapegoat.

Of course I don't! Sorry if people missed my irony

monkeydancer wrote:

goroth wrote:

monkeydancer wrote:Hey for all its faults brexit is all about freedom (it gave me physical pain to type this)

Yay London, fun place to be

You don't believe that really MD.

It's about a class of folks disappointed with their futures, yearning after a past that never really existed finding a convenient scapegoat.

Of course I don't! Sorry if people missed my irony

We all know honey. We remember your pain when the topic was brought up. If you wanted freedom, you would obviously behead (well exiling them to Ireland would be enough) your royal overlords and not replace them with another family of royal overlords like you did last time.

Moving the royals to Ireland would be... controversial. Probably not a good idea!

Get rid of them for sure though, nobody should inherit power over a nation (or anything else)