Chase Bliss Audio has posted this pic on FB.
I guess it's a Flanger.
Moderator: Ghost Hip
sylnau wrote:
I guess it's a Flanger.
Inconuucl wrote:I've yet to notice the difference sound-wise between a flanger and a phaser, anyone care to enlighten me?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
The real difference between a phaser and flanger is that a flanger always produces a large number of notches that are an even multiple of frequency apart. Even phasers with large numbers of stages (I've heard of 20 stage devices!) can't compete with the multiple notches that a flanger puts out. The spacing of the notches is also audible as a change in tone, and it takes some careful trimming to get phaser notches spaced the same regular spacing as a flanger.
lordgalvar wrote:
Might try this Chase Bliss out. edit: it says analog on it slow typing loses.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
resincum wrote:finally, not another pll clone
Chankgeez wrote:lordgalvar wrote:
Might try this Chase Bliss out. edit: it says analog on it slow typing loses.
Yeah, it's probably the same as his other pedals: analog with digital control.
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogazetuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests