Gone Fission wrote:Re: Shirtstorm, science classrooms with girls in them watched that live. When people asked what signal the pretty fricking lurid, NSFW shirt sent about the place of women in science in a very measured manner, they got death threats and rape threats and worse. One of the people on the receiving end of the threats is very close to me. I don't care how aggrieved anyone is because a feminist or member of the "PC police" hurt his (and it's almost always his) fee-fees. Death threats, rape threats, etc., are fucking midnight rides KKK-level terrorism shit.
I'm not saying in anyway that is anyone in this thread, but the mere mention of that incident makes my blood fucking boil. I do not assume the worst of the people who think the initial shirtstorm critique was an overreaction, though I may disagree with them on that point. We cool.
Around here, people can actually take it like someone who has graduated kindergarten when someone points out they're doing something inconsiderate or assholy, or if there is a mere difference of perspective of opinion. This isn't about proscribed speech or thought, it's about the only rule here: try not to be an asshole. If only the rest of the world operated on that rule. It's part of why I prefer ILF to most of the rest of the world.
Fair enough. Let me preface this post by saying I have an "inappropriate" (no u) dry sense of humor that tends to get me in trouble.
IMO (paraphrasing) "What signal does that shirt send about the place of women in science" is a counterproductive straw argument. Hijacking the discussion from a scientific milestone, to a peripheral, emotional roundtable debate on women-specific issues displays no less poor taste than that tacky novelty shirt. Asking "what signal does that shirt send?" isn't a loaded question that leads the reader into a predetermined conclusion. In my case, the answer? NERD ALERT!
I don't think the celebration or objectification of female beauty and form, nor do contributions from the brightest (female) brains have to be at odds or mutually exclusive; they can and do coexist. A loud cartoon babes-print Hawaiian style shirt is so over the top goofy that I struggle to see things from the complainer's perspective. Personal choices don't represent a community or committee...and the silliness is being ignored. Look at him.
I mean, the fella is fully sleeved on both arms, and there's no outraged debate over the (perceived) reflection or marginalization of the scientific community/professionalism etc...despite the constant noise of how frowned upon that is in *the real world*.
It's an individual who made those (questionable) judgement calls/choices. Like the woman who chose to make a personal disagreement into a public spectacle, there are consequences for actions. That said, I don't see malice from either one...and there's no excuse for the crazies to go on the attack and personally antagonize, even harass and issue threats on either protagonist's behalf. That type of malice born extremism is unacceptable and should always be taken seriously. A novelty shirt? Not so much.
Anyway, sorry about your friend being bullied.
Carlin was right. Men are stupid, women are crazy.
Many women are/become crazy because of stupid men, but plenty would still be running for mayor of crazy town even without men in their lives.
And women can be stupid, too...there's plenty of overlap both ways with men alike.
Equal opportunity
ILF's tolerance for silliness is high. The rest of the world should def take note.